Hillary Clinton Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorolfr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So we’re supposed to take the word of a radio show doctor who has never actually examined her or her actual medical records… ok :rolleyes:
I was a little skeptical, too, but this Dr. Drew Pinsky sounds pretty reasonable and has a good reputation with an MD from University of Southern California School of Medicine. According to Wikipedia:
Pinsky is also Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, former Medical Director for the Department of Chemical Dependency Services at Las Encinas Hospital in Pasadena, California,[3] staff member at Huntington Memorial Hospital, and a private practitioner.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drew_Pinsky

Pinsky points out that Clinton released some of her medical records which also described the treatment she was receiving and he and some other doctors he talked to found that treatment and some of the medications that she was being given to be rather outdated and sometimes unusual. He seems to be more concerned about the quality of medical care that she’s been receiving than he is about her health issues.
 
I’ve noticed that several posters who are now Republican or Republican-leaning were former Democrats. I was just wondering where the cradle Republicans hang out and also whether it ever works the other way around, starting as Republican and becoming Democrat.
I know several people that are former Republicans, now Democrats (and some are older than their 20’s).

I was raised in, and considered myself a Republican until about 16, then became a Democrat. I now consider myself to be Independent (moderate/libertarian). I was having political conversations and opinions already at the age of 7 because my dad is very political.
 
mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article96359737.html

excerpt:

**State Department records show only three of nine top Clinton aides took the mandated training for new employees. Records also suggest that none of seven top aides required to take subsequent annual training completed it.

No records indicate whether Clinton herself took any training.

Many of the aides still work for Clinton on her presidential campaign or are advising her in her bid for the White House against Republican Donald Trump in November.

The documents were obtained by the Republican National Committee, which filed a lawsuit to get them after a Freedom of Information Act request did not produce them.
**
 
mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article96359737.html

excerpt:

**State Department records show only three of nine top Clinton aides took the mandated training for new employees. Records also suggest that none of seven top aides required to take subsequent annual training completed it.

No records indicate whether Clinton herself took any training.

Many of the aides still work for Clinton on her presidential campaign or are advising her in her bid for the White House against Republican Donald Trump in November.

The documents were obtained by the Republican National Committee, which filed a lawsuit to get them after a Freedom of Information Act request did not produce them.
**
I think it’s a little late for Hillary Clinton (as well as Donald Trump) to take any kind of ethics training. Maybe not so for her aides, however.
 
I think it’s a little late for Hillary Clinton (as well as Donald Trump) to take any kind of ethics training. Maybe not so for her aides, however.
The ethics training is mandatory … not optional.

Not voluntary.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
 
AP: Clinton Foundation says if Hillary Clinton elected president, it will no longer accept foreign and corporate donations.
 
So only US interests will be able to pay to play?
“Pay for play” is catchy - I’ll give you that. If it were rooted in reality and not conspiracy theories, it might even be meaningful.

But it’s not, so it remains a silly jingle.
 
“Pay for play” is catchy - I’ll give you that. If it were rooted in reality and not conspiracy theories, it might even be meaningful.

But it’s not, so it remains a silly jingle.
Allow me to introduce Mr. Rajiv Fernando: Clinton donor and online stock trader who was appointed to the State Department’s International Security Advisory Board - the board responsible for developing US nuclear weapon strategies.
 
Allow me to introduce Mr. Rajiv Fernando: Clinton donor and online stock trader who was appointed to the State Department’s International Security Advisory Board - the board responsible for developing US nuclear weapon strategies.
🤷 As Little Sheep said it might be meaningful if there was real proof and not just conspiracy theories. You gave no real proof that Mr Fernando was solely appointed because he was a donor. As stated in the article, it’s not unimaginable someone of a different experience might bring a certain level of expertise. As the article says, in Mr. Fernando’s case, he brought a unique perspective to the International Advisory Board. Having had years of experience in implementing sophisticated risk management tools, in information technology and international finance.
 
Evert woman has a right to be believed EXCEPT for Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Wiley and Paula Jones
And** Kathy Shelton, the 12 year old virgin rape victim** she harrassed with a battery of court ordered mandatory psychological tests …

factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing … [and] that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body,”
according to an affidavit filed by Clinton in support of her motion.
Clinton also cited an expert in child psychology who said that

“children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents with disorganized families, such as the complainant’s, are even more prone to such behavior,”
Clinton wrote in her affidavit.

the then lawyer Hillary Rodham got 41 year old Thomas Taylor off with a much reduced charge of “fondling a minor” (despite Shelton’s serious injuries and eyewitness identification of her assailant. And adamant denials of any “seeking out older men” or consent.

And a few more feminine names may be in that “not to be believed …” exception pile.

breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/31/rap-sheet-the-women-who-claim-to-be-victims-of-bill-and-hillary-clinton/
**Connie Hamzy – Sexual Harassment
**
Self-proclaimed rock-and-roll groupie, who said Mr. Clinton propositioned her in 1984 while she was sunbathing by a Little Rock hotel pool …
**Eileen Wellstone– Sexual Assault
**
English woman who said Mr. Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near Oxford University where Mr. Clinton was a student in 1969.
Sandra Allen James– Sexual Assault
Former Washington, D.C., political fund-raiser who said Mr. Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a 1991 campaign trip, pinned her against the wall and put his hand under her dress.
Christy Zercher– Sexual Assault
Airline flight attendant on Mr. Clinton’s 1992 campaign plane, who said Mr. Clinton exposed himself and grabbed her breasts.
**22 Year-Old Yale Student – Sexual Assault
**
In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton, a law student at the college.
**University of Arkansas Student – Sexual Assault
**
In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference. She said he groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ”came on” to him.
**Paula Jones – Sexual Harrassment,. Character Assassination
**
She had asked to meet him because it would be ‘exciting’ to meet the governor, and she hoped it might lead to promotion. Instead, she said in court, she found herself telling him she was ‘not that kind of girl’.
It was a brief encounter and she alleged that Mr. Clinton took her hand, pulled her towards him, then said: ‘I love your curves.’
She tried to walk away, she said in a deposition, but ‘Mr. Clinton then walked over to the sofa, lowered his trousers and underwear, exposed his penis (which was erect) and told me to “kiss it.”‘ …
Jones delivers her own verdict on Hillary’s bid to become president, saying that her husband’s attitude towards women disqualifies Bill from re-entering the White House – while what she calls Hillary’s ‘lies’ disqualify her from the Oval Office.
‘There is no way that [Hillary] did not know what was going on, that women were being abused and accosted by her husband,’ she says. ‘They have both lied.’
Clinton settled this case for $850,000.
Monica Lewinsky – Character Assassination
After lying to the American people to keep the Oval Office affair secret, Team Clinton and the DC Media ganged up on this 21-year-old intern to smear her as a crazy stalker.
She may be in the running for most cheated on woman in America. Is this person REALLY America’s sharpest knife in the drawer – as some would have it? :doh2:
 
No matter what, it’s still mind-boggling that Catholics are about to elect the most pro-abortion woman ever, to be our first woman president. PP is giving her millions of dollars to get her elected and our Church says one cannot be Catholic and support abortion.

This proves Catholics do not listen to our leaders. Maybe our leaders are too soft to teach us right from wrong.
 
No matter what, it’s still mind-boggling that Catholics are about to elect the most pro-abortion woman ever, to be our first woman president. PP is giving her millions of dollars to get her elected and our Church says one cannot be Catholic and support abortion.

This proves Catholics do not listen to our leaders. Maybe our leaders are too soft to teach us right from wrong.
If you’re looking for a church that will be militant in preaching against abortion in church every week, I would suggest attending one of these churches:

-Independent Fundamentalist Baptist Church
-Protestant Reformed Churches in America
-Laestadian Lutheran Church
 
Although the polls are tightening the biggest impediments to Hillary’s election have nothing to do with Trump

Here are what I perceive as her biggest problems between now and the election:
  1. Probable release of incriminating email in October.
  2. Her health. She she is already taking weekends off and needs help getting on to and off the stage. She has had several falls where fortunately she was caught before it became evident If she has a seizure of fall while giving a speech it will seriously impact her candidacy
  3. More inner city riots and/or assassinated policemen. She has fully embraced the black lives matter movement and seems(along with her party) indifferent to slain police officers(how many widows of slain policemen were allowed to speak at her convention?)
  4. Problems in the Ukraine, Syria or Libya. During her term as SOS she totally screwed up these three regions.
  5. Bill Clinton-attitudes towards sexual harassment are quite different than when he was given a pass and harassing and allegedlyaping women. Hillary has already had to change her policies on sexual harassment(“every women deserves to be believed”) because of this
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top