No he wouldn’t. Spouses have a biased view of their spouses, both positive and negative. I am sure if I asked your spouse about you, it would not be objective.
She would be in the best position to know, nevertheless.
It might be a case of the right hand not knowing what the left is doing too, or the shadow knows.
Overtly, in her support for me, she would put her best foot forward. We are connected.There will always be that facade, the social mask that we all wear, that couples wear together even.
Latently, and unconsciously, there is also a part of the human will that needs to express itself more truthfully, more darkly even, and try to reveal what is purposely hidden behind our masks.
To know something or someone objectively is to know like Eve knew the uneaten fruit in the garden. One can give a very intellectual and rational account based on that kind of understanding.
But once you take a bite, aah, then you really do know the guy
Subjective understanding does not mean that you know the person any less. The one who has taken the bite has a kind of knowledge that surpasses objective knowledge, They have the kind of knowledge that is based on experience, and not on hearsay, even God’s hearsay.
I think that my wife is in the best position to know me, warts and all, in many ways better than I know myself.
And in that way too, Bill is in the best position to know Hillary.
He is not a disinterested party to her success or failure too, and I described one scenario where to the extent that she succeeds, he fails.
Other than that, I have no idea why you think that I was in any way disagreeing with the conversation that you were having with others.
I can see why Bill might not be too happy with Hillary as his legacy too.