Hillary Clinton Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorolfr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thorolfr said:
If you think that Hillary Clinton would be the “most corrupt person to ever hold the office of President,” perhaps you’re too young to have heard of Richard Nixon (who was a Republican BTW). And then there is Warren G. Harding (another Republican) whose administration was involved in the notorious Teapot Dome Scandal:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teapot_Dome_scandal

Harding is considered by historians and political scientists to be one of the worst US presidents ever.
Click to expand...
Nixon was a piker compared to Hilary. She has been bought and paid for by several Middle East countries.and by Russia.
 
philipl said:
Nixon was a piker compared to Hilary. She has been bought and paid for by several Middle East countries.and by Russia.
Click to expand...
And you think that the Bushes have not been bought by several Middle Eastern countries?
 
philipl said:
Nixon was a piker compared to Hilary. She has been bought and paid for by several Middle East countries.and by Russia.
Click to expand...
Exactly! The Clinton’s have given a whole new meaning to the word corrupt,look it up in the dictionary you would find their pictures right beside it. We are circling the drain as a society and Hillary will get us there n record speed
 
America is no longer a country of laws.

It is a country of privilege. Not only do the courts legislate, but the FBI as well rewrites the laws in order to protect the privileged class.
Intent has nothing to do with gross negligence. If the intent to harm the country was there, the charge would have been sedition, and not gross negligence.

Banana plantations to follow.
 
Thorolfr said:
And you think that the Bushes have not been bought by several Middle Eastern countries?
Click to expand...
I am unaware of a Bush foundation where millions and millions are donated and then a Bush gave up US interest in favor of that country.
 
philipl said:
I am unaware of a Bush foundation where millions and millions are donated and then a Bush gave up US interest in favor of that country.
Click to expand...
What U.S. interest did Hillary Clinton give up in favor of a foreign donor? Facts, please.
 
Darryl1958 said:
America is no longer a country of laws.

It is a country of privilege. Not only do the courts legislate, but the FBI as well rewrites the laws in order to protect the privileged class.
Intent has nothing to do with gross negligence. If the intent to harm the country was there, the charge would have been sedition, and not gross negligence.

Banana plantations to follow.
Click to expand...
So very true, we no longer have rights but government issued privileges. And progressive agree with this new system. It’s not just the clintons but our government as a whole is corrupt. This is the same thing that happened at the end to the Roman Empire. This country is finished thanks to progressives
 
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
Click to expand...
“To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.”

:confused:
FBI Director James Comey detailed Hillary Clinton’s massive destruction of government records and grossly negligent handling of classified information. Frankly, there’s a disconnect between Comey’s devastating findings and his weak recommendation not to prosecute Hillary Clinton. (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch
Click to expand...
 
Darryl1958 said:
America is no longer a country of laws.

It is a country of privilege. Not only do the courts legislate, but the FBI as well rewrites the laws in order to protect the privileged class.
Intent has nothing to do with gross negligence. If the intent to harm the country was there, the charge would have been sedition, and not gross negligence.

Banana plantations to follow.
Click to expand...
Well said!👍
 
It was impressive when in the early seventies the Fifth Estate, with the people of America on board, and everybody working in concert with the Congress; the most powerful person of the world was brought down for egregious behavior unbecoming of the office of the presidency.

This was a low point for America, but a high point for a free country based on checks on balances functioning as it was designed to function. Nobody, not even a POTUS, was deemed to be above the law.

It was a tough bicentennial to be sure in the wake of such a cataclysmic event, but less than a decade later America was surging ahead of the rest of the world and on a boom in economic initiative and confidence and gusto that was going to last longer than any boom in American history. The whole world rose to new heights on the strength of the wave that America generated.

If there is a watershed event that I might point to to indicate that the America of checks and balances that could peacefully oust a president was on the way out, I would say that it was the day that the IRS was exposed as using their office as a political tool against the Tea Party.

Initially, Obama came out prepared for full damage control, fully expecting a harsh kickback on such a story coming to light.
But in a twinkling, he found that that would be a totally unnecessary response. The free press buried the story. The American populace was lethargic and indifferent to the extent that it was not them that the IRS was going after. There was no interest whatsoever of getting to the bottom of this or correcting the system in any way.

The story was aborted quicker than a baby in Harlem.

That was the day, I think, when the system of checks and balances sculpted by the American Founding Fathers died.

And if there was any doubt that that system of checks and balances is as dead as a door nail, there cannot be any doubt now.

The story of the Clintons is not really just the story of the Undewoods of House of Cards. There, it is all about a corrupt and ruthless couple running roughshod over the system.

This is much worse. Here, it is the system itself that is corrupt.
The IRS is not there to provide a service to the people. The IRS exist to push a political agenda. The FBI is not there to serve justice. The FBI is there to protect the elites and enable them to whatever extent is needed. They are mere bodyguards for hire.

This is not just about an election.

Is there anything left that is even worth saving?
 
Darryl1958 said:
It was impressive when in the early seventies the Fifth Estate, with the people of America on board, and everybody working in concert with the Congress; the most powerful person of the world was brought down for egregious behavior unbecoming of the office of the presidency.

This was a low point for America, but a high point for a free country based on checks on balances functioning as it was designed to function. Nobody, not even a POTUS, was deemed to be above the law.

It was a tough bicentennial to be sure in the wake of such a cataclysmic event, but less than a decade later America was surging ahead of the rest of the world and on a boom in economic initiative and confidence and gusto that was going to last longer than any boom in American history. The whole world rose to new heights on the strength of the wave that America generated.

If there is a watershed event that I might point to to indicate that the America of checks and balances that could peacefully oust a president was on the way out, I would say that it was the day that the IRS was exposed as using their office as a political tool against the Tea Party.

Initially, Obama came out prepared for full damage control, fully expecting a harsh kickback on such a story coming to light.
But in a twinkling, he found that that would be a totally unnecessary response. The free press buried the story. The American populace was lethargic and indifferent to the extent that it was not them that the IRS was going after. There was no interest whatsoever of getting to the bottom of this or correcting the system in any way.

The story was aborted quicker than a baby in Harlem.

That was the day, I think, when the system of checks and balances sculpted by the American Founding Fathers died.

And if there was any doubt that that system of checks and balances is as dead as a door nail, there cannot be any doubt now.

The story of the Clintons is not really just the story of the Undewoods of House of Cards. There, it is all about a corrupt and ruthless couple running roughshod over the system.

This is much worse. Here, it is the system itself that is corrupt.
The IRS is not there to provide a service to the people. The IRS exist to push a political agenda. The FBI is not there to serve justice. The FBI is there to protect the elites and enable them to whatever extent is needed. They are mere bodyguards for hire.

This is not just about an election.

Is there anything left that is even worth saving?
Click to expand...
I was thinking about the difference last night in how america responded then and now. We are in a critical period here. The spiral down appears to be quickening.

Think about this, would you or I hire Hillary after this? Would the government hire her? Would the FBI hire her? Would any police or security dept hire her? The ONLY place Hillary would find employment is in some suspect security area like Mateen or George Zimmerman have. But the presidency?

Who would trust Hillary with security and vital information? She should be banned from security all together. And assuming rational thinking is in the drivers seat the idea of a president is absurd. The democrats are hell bent and irrational on this Hillary march to where? The WH? We have anarchy happening, one might rightly ask after this, what law?
 
mary_bobo said:
Proof, please. One can make allegations any time, but it would be nice to have some proof offered.
Click to expand...
He’s probably thinking of that famous picture of George W. Bush holding hands with a Saudi prince as they enjoy a leisurely stroll in the garden.
 
tomarin said:
He’s probably thinking of that famous picture of George W. Bush holding hands with a Saudi prince as they enjoy a leisurely stroll in the garden.
Click to expand...
And that would constitute a proof of corruption?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top