J
Jeanne_S
Guest
They have an answer for everything,don’t they?A Clinton spokesperson said that Huma was only listed on the masthead because everyone in the family was.![]()
They have an answer for everything,don’t they?A Clinton spokesperson said that Huma was only listed on the masthead because everyone in the family was.![]()
Indeed. And it doesn’t even have to be a good answer for HRC’s supporters to get behind it.They have an answer for everything,don’t they?![]()
The attorney who was White House Counsel for Nixon, John Dean gives a detailed account of the false charges against Hillary and the distortions and lies they have been spreading to make them.The polls scare me. Perhaps HC will be indicted for perjury or some other felonious act (there are many to choose from) and Trump will be elected.
Thoughts?
Jenna
This is where we need to be in the next 100 days and ongoing. To win a landslide in this election, to defeat Trump and the Republicans is a giant task. We are setting the bar high. We can do it if we stick together . . .
cpusa.org/article/forward-to-defeat-trump/The most persuasive argument to convince many working-class and struggling people to register and to vote is a simple comparison of the positions of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. At stake is the existence of a Department of Education, Environmental protection, voting rights, union rights, immigrant rights, health and safety, abortion rights, threat of nuclear war and the Supreme Court to name a few. The Voting Rights decisions that just took place in the lower courts are just one indication of how important the Supreme Court is.
The leader of America’s most prominent communist party credits Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders with helping usher socialism into the political mainstream, but says it’s essential to back Hillary Clinton if she defeats Sanders in the Democratic presidential primary.
usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-31/communist-party-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clintonJohn Bachtell, national chairman of the Communist Party USA, says he cast a ballot for Sanders in the Illinois primary in March, but that the self-styled democratic socialist’s loyal backers should temper their criticism of Clinton as a warmongering Wall Street puppet.
This should surprise no one, particularly since the Dem party rigged the outcome of whom they planned to nominate for their party…Clinton. That tactic is a communist one.There has been a lot of coverage from the News Media of some extremists groups supporting Trump.
Communist Party USA has endorsed Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Election.
Zero coverage from the News Media about that; and no questions from the News Media asked to Hillary Clinton about it.
cpusa.org/article/forward-to-defeat-trump/
usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-31/communist-party-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clinton
More about Communist Party USA: Former CPUSA Leader:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Davis
That’s the first time I’ve ever heard “campaigning and convincing people to vote for you” described as “rigging the election”. Clinton, was, after all, the true choice of most of the democratic voters.This should surprise no one, particularly since the Dem party rigged the outcome of whom they planned to nominate for their party…Clinton. That tactic is a communist one.
Both alive and dead!That’s the first time I’ve ever heard “campaigning and convincing people to vote for you” described as “rigging the election”. Clinton, was, after all, the true choice of most of the democratic voters.
:newidea: Living, dead, ineligible or fictional! :dancing:That’s the first time I’ve ever heard “campaigning and convincing people to vote for you” described as “rigging the election”. Clinton, was, after all, the true choice of most of the democratic voters.
You obviously missed the scandal leading to the fixed outcome at the Democratic convention guaranteeing a Clinton nomination. There’s plenty of coverage on the topic on the internet if you’re interested.That’s the first time I’ve ever heard “campaigning and convincing people to vote for you” described as “rigging the election”. Clinton, was, after all, the true choice of most of the democratic voters.
Not really because for instance if a physician prescribes a female a contraceptive to treat a medical condition, that to me falls under healthcare. And once she is in the privacy of her home, I still don’t see how we are going to know if the woman who is not of the Catholic faith is using the covered item simply to avoid an unwanted pregnancy or not. And while I understand the Catholic employer’s religious view about evil, an employer of the Jehovah Witness faith might likewise believe blood transfusions are evil. I personally simply find it a complicated area and not as black and white. But not being certain if this topic falls under political candidates and campaigns and the election, I can’t keep discussing this with you due to the recent political post limit the CAF “powers to be” have placed on it’s membership. My stats show this is only my 5th of 10 allotted posts labelled today. Although some were about Louisiana. But I don’t know what a day constitutes on CAF, if a 24 hr period or the actual date or day. And in what time zone the day is counted. I’m in the ET but CAF may be in the PT. But I appreciate you trying to explain and you have done so the Catholic view well. Thank you. Blessings!I’m not sure you understand the concept of Big Brother from your response. A Catholic employer doesn’t wish to commit an evil act, so he doesn’t include contraception and abortion in the healthcare plan. That’s it. Now if an employee goes to the pharmacy and purchases contraception, he doesn’t know about it. If he/she uses said contraception, he doesn’t know about it. He’s not involved in it at all. At no point is the government involved, so Big Brother is unaware of all of this. Sounds ideal.
Now let’s take your preferred method. A Catholic businessman doesn’t wish to commit evil, so he either has to cancel the health insurance plan, or commit mortal sin by including such evils. He doesn’t wish to, but Big Brother is forcing him to commit evil.
Does this help explain what Big Brother is, and how your example doesn’t make any sense?
I know about the claims and suspicions. I along know that even if there was some rigging, HRC enjoys the support of Sanders, her only real opponent.You obviously missed the scandal leading to the fixed outcome at the Democratic convention guaranteeing a Clinton nomination. There’s plenty of coverage on the topic on the internet if you’re interested.
Correct and voters preferred her for the nomination over Bernie by 55% to 45% and by over 3.7 million votes. I don’t know why people even keep bringing up the claims.I know about the claims and suspicions. I along know that even if there was some rigging, HRC enjoys the support of Sanders, her only real opponent.
We’ll never know that when it was rigged against Sanders, now will we?That’s the first time I’ve ever heard “campaigning and convincing people to vote for you” described as “rigging the election”. Clinton, was, after all, the true choice of most of the democratic voters.
You might not be aware that people lost their jobs over the scandal. They are more than merely claims and suspicions.I know about the claims and suspicions. I along know that even if there was some rigging, HRC enjoys the support of Sanders, her only real opponent.
deleted by me.It’s not as if the Clinton Foundation is unique in associating itself with countries that have serious human rights problems. The US does this regularly, counting as major allies countries with serious human rights abuses including Egypt, Israel, Saudi Arabia, etc. On top of that, last year, Saudi Arabia was appointed to oversee an important panel on the United Nation’s Human Rights Council.
thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/22/why-is-saudi-arabia-heading-the-u-n-human-rights-council.html
Or just last month: “British government refuses to rule out re-electing Saudi Arabia to UN human rights council”
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/saudi-arabia-human-rights-un-united-nations-uk-british-elected-behead-a7140501.html
Not really because for instance if a physician prescribes a female a contraceptive to treat a medical condition, that to me falls under healthcare. And once she is in the privacy of her home, I still don’t see how we are going to know if the woman who is not of the Catholic faith is using the covered item simply to avoid an unwanted pregnancy or not. And while I understand the Catholic employer’s religious view about evil, an employer of the Jehovah Witness faith might likewise believe blood transfusions are evil. I personally simply find it a complicated area and not as black and white. But not being certain if this topic falls under political candidates and campaigns and the election, I can’t keep discussing this with you due to the recent political post limit the CAF “powers to be” have placed on it’s membership. My stats show this is only my 5th of 10 allotted posts labelled today. Although some were about Louisiana. But I don’t know what a day constitutes on CAF, if a 24 hr period or the actual date or day. And in what time zone the day is counted. I’m in the ET but CAF may be in the PT. But I appreciate you trying to explain and you have done so the Catholic view well. Thank you. Blessings!
hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CAMPAIGN_2016_CLINTON_FOUNDATION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-08-23-14-35-04More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money - either personally or through companies or groups - to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.