M
Mommyof02green
Guest
:yup:Different situations call for different sort of protocols. Being loose and casual all the time is no more appropriate than being stiff and formal all the time. Balance.![]()
:yup:Different situations call for different sort of protocols. Being loose and casual all the time is no more appropriate than being stiff and formal all the time. Balance.![]()
I would think that it is similar to Americans addressing Queen Elizabeth as Your Majesty, as simply a gesture of respect. Itâs a recognition of her position within her own culture, not an assumption that she is therefore Queen of America, or that they considered themselves bound to her in any way.
I would not, under any circumstances call her your majesty. She is not my queenâby the grace of God, and the blood of my ancestors (may they rest in the peace of the Lord), who fought and bled to set us free from English tyranny.True, however as another poster stated, the Queen of England can be called ââYour Majestyââ without you believing her to be your Queen.
I happen to agree with you. I hope that Mr Falwell may rest in peace. But he was not a man to inspire me with any affection; he was far too narrow in his understanding of what it means to be Christian.for better or worse he shaped American Politics and Fundamentalism into what it is today.
I believe he was sincere in his zealâeven if it was misplaced at times. And he died working. He was not very kind to Catholics tho. But still he was given more respect from us than the President showed the Holy Father, IMO.
Ravyn
I cannot imagine calling the pope anything other than Your Holiness!! The man is the servant of Almighty God. As a fellow Christian, at least, President Bush should have shown more respect. I hope it may have been a simple mistake, not a deliberate slightâŚYeah I agree with you that the pope should have been referred to as Your Holiness, his proper title.
It is considered respectful enough to be used to address our Head of State (the President is referred to as Mr. President or sir), so I donât see it as being casual or paltry.While âsirâ is indeed a respectful term to used and is used often here in the American South (because weâre awesomely polite that way), it would seem a bit paltry for religious leaders like the pope.
There is only one woman deserving of the titles âyour majestyâ & âyour highnessâ. She is aZooey, that is why she is ââHer Majestyââ and ââHer Highnessââ Calling the Queen ââYour Majestyââ doesnât indicate that she is your queen.
Damn, alright no argument there!There is only one woman deserving of the titles âyour majestyâ & âyour highnessâ. She is aNice Jewish girl, who one day said to an angel who visited her, âLet it be done unto me according to your wordââŚ
Now, there is a woman born to be Queen!!!![]()
![]()
Without intending any disrespect, I canât be quite that stingy with titles wherever they convey respect for the dignity of persons. Why, my own family has two princesses, and a queen, and yes they are referred to as such frequently. I doubt our heavenly queen minds.There is only one woman deserving of the titles âyour majestyâ & âyour highnessâ.