Because the mainstream media and the New York Times have such a perfect record on scholarship and religion

. . .
Oh I know, I know, even a stopped watch is right twice a day.
However, in this case (pace, Dr King). . .this isn’t one of those times.
This is, quite simply, not credible. I have seen in the past 3 decades of historical writing (and I mean historians, not ‘historical fiction’) a greater and greater tendency for the ‘historian’ to come up with a certain POV, and then ‘maneuver facts’ (or the lack of facts!) to bolster his or her theory.
This person is one of the most blatant cases in point. She has a personal theory and by golly, nothing is going to deter her from grabbing at whatever straw she can.
Wasn’t it PT Barnum who said “there’s a sucker born every minute”? I’ll go one further. There is a ‘would be historian’ born every year or so who will try to achieve his or her 15 minutes’ worth of fame by utilizing the fact that there’s a sucker born every minute who will be willing to fall for whatever supports that SUCKER’S POV". . .
I trust that was ‘nice’ enough!!