ryanoneil;5314184:
I don’t think you are being accurate in your understanding of Galatians 4. In that Pauline allegory, Paul compares the Sinaitic Covenant made with Israel to Hagar, the slave woman; and the Christian “New Covenant” to Sarah, who is free Jerusalem. Then, at the end, He urges to throw away the slave woman with her son. He means, the Sinaitic Covenant with Israel because of the establishment of a new order. That’s in two words, Replacement Theology.
I don’t think so. You’ve said on a number of occasions about gentiles following the Noahide Law. Paul is telling the formerly pagan Galatians that they are not required to observe the liturgical calendar of Israel and the ritual ordinances of the Mosaic Law (which the Judaizers demanded). All that is required of them is observance of the Moral Law (ten commandments).
**The heir of David is not an individual but according to God’s promise to David, he is Judah, the People, which would remain forever in Jerusalem. Judah, according to I Kings 11:36. **
That is talking about Solomon who is an individual. Of course the people are included but it doesn’t only apply to the Jewish people as a whole.
**Too hypothetical. Especially because that would happened only if Israel ceased as a People before the Lord forever. (Jer. 31:35-37) **
That is another way of saying the New Covenant will last forever.
**You are still being hypothetical. The Gentiles have been included since God decided to spare Israel for the sake of David. (I Kings 11:36) **
And God’s covenant with David is made to renew and fulfill the promise to Abraham. And Abraham is called to be “the father of a host of nations” not just one nation (Genesis 17:4; 22:17-18). God’s purpose is to bless the human race, transforming into a single family of God, to make each individual what Adam was intended to be - a son of God the Most High, heir to the kingdom of heaven, a ruler of creation, a “priest” who sees his or her life as a work of worship and thanksgiving, a sacrifice of praise.