Holding Hands During the Our Father

  • Thread starter Thread starter bsdman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
At the point in the Mass of the Our Father, we are moments away from the “source and summit” of our faith as Catholics–the Eucharist. We are addressing God with the very words Christ himself gave to us as a prayer to the Father. The fact that we are nearly shoulder to shoulder and have, together with the priest, offered up our gifts to the Lord, is statement enough of our community. I really don’t want or need someone’s sweaty mit grabbing my hand and attempting a spiritual “Cumbaya” moment.
More power to you, then.
You don’t grab my sweaty mitt, I won’t grab yours. I don’t know what the heck Kumbaya has to do with anything.
But hey, that’s just me. And apparently a few other folks here. And the general understanding of the GIRM by those who don’t have an agenda to push. 🤷
Hmm. Post after post of projected hostility at the very idea of touching another person shudder…when nobody on the thread has even suggested that you do so. Nah, no agenda there.
 
Hi. Hope you don’t mind me sticking my two cents in here.

I thought the Our Father was considered a vertical prayer (meaning directly from the person towards Our Father) and not a horizontal prayer (meaning a prayer stretching horizontally towards our neighbors and then up). I know it says “Our Father” but I still thought I heard that it was a vertical prayer.

Something about holding hands and lifting them up bothers me. It doesn’t seem properly liturgical. Fortunetly, I’m a church organist so unless I’m not playing, I don’t have to worry about it. I did have an older woman I know insist that I hold her hand once. She seems to think that it’s the proper thing to do. 😦

I’m a convert so there’s plenty I don’t know about. I swam the Tiber in '01. I was one of the ones who walked over several pews to give a sign of peace to people I barely knew. :o Eventually, that didn’t feel proper either so I stopped.

This may be a minor issue but…sometimes bigger issues start when they’re little itty bitty issues that no one wants to take care.

Well, like I said. Just my two cents. 🙂
 
More power to you, then.
You don’t grab my sweaty mitt, I won’t grab yours.
Woohoo! Mission accomplished! 👍
Hmm. Post after post of projected hostility at the very idea of touching another person shudder…when nobody on the thread has even suggested that you do so. Nah, no agenda there.
It has everything to do with context. I’m not against human contact at all. Far from it. What I am against is foisting a practice in the divine liturgy where it has no business being. One could just as easily replace “holding hands” with “humming showtunes”… neither one is expressly prohibited, common sense should inform one that both handholding and humming are out of place given the solemn nature of what is happening at the time.

Aside from turning someone’s sacred cow into sirloin, I’m not sure why such unrequited attraction toward an unsupported practice persists.
 
It has everything to do with context. I’m not against human contact at all. Far from it. What I am against is foisting a practice in the divine liturgy where it has no business being. One could just as easily replace “holding hands” with “humming showtunes”… neither one is expressly prohibited, common sense should inform one that both handholding and humming are out of place given the solemn nature of what is happening at the time.
The showtunes thing…again, I don’t see the point of you saying something like that.

As far as “foisting a practice on the liturgy that has no business being there”: This might be getting to the heart of the discussion. I totally respect that sentiment. You may be suprised that I actually agree with you here. But now that holding hands is, for better or for worse, a common practice in a lot of parishes…what do you think should be done? Why hasn’t the Church tossed it out yet?

And you don’t need to compare it with ridiculous things that aren’t a part of any mass.
Aside from turning someone’s sacred cow into sirloin, I’m not sure why such unrequited attraction toward an unsupported practice persists.
Well, the fact that it persists proves that it’s not unsupported.

I think I’m not being too clear, though.
My perspective is not “let’s all hold hands during mass!”. Like I’ve said, in the time and place I grew up, we grew up with the option of taking your neighbors hand during this prayer. If it is ever prohibited, fine by me. When I have gone to a parish where it’s not as common to hold hands (or the TLM, for instance) I have no problem whatsoever not doing it! Sometimes even at my home parish I don’t feel like doing it.

I do appreciate the outward sign of fellowship, but I don’t think that holding hands has anything to do with the Our Father prayer itself, doesn’t try to add or take anything away from it. It’s just what we’re doing with our hands as we stand and pray together w/ the rest of the church. There is nothing wrong with that. How does it make our prayer less “solemn”? It does show the community of the church, but in no way is this to the detriment of the Sacrifice, nor does it get in the way of our prayer to the Father. If you still insist that it does either of these two things, please explain exactly how…because obviously a whole lot of people aren’t seeing it.
 
Has anyone else noticed their neighbors taking out that hand sanitizer gel and rubbing their hands and handing it down the pew to their family right after the kiss of peace. I think it is so funny because first they have this attitude like “Don’t you dare resist my hands!”:mad: and then they are the ones that go and sanitize.😛
I have been forced by old ladies to hold hands. If it was anyone besides an old lady, I would fight, but I feel bad for those confused old people.

As far as the kiss of peace, the vatican just said that it should be reserved to the people immediately to you left or right. The priest at one of the two parishes we go to mentioned this so at that parish I refuse anyone except the people to my left and right, but at the more liberal parish where this has not been mentioned, I say peace to those who say it to me. Oncethe Lamb of God start I act as though no one else exists though because otherwise they would all keep going on forever.
My family does not wish eachother peace because we do not like that part of the mass, but we do wish those who wish us peace- peace because otherwise they get all huffy and because the priest told us to share peace with those around us.
To me it would be more peaceful if we did not have the kiss of peace.
 
Bless me father… Yesterday I held hands during the Our Father. 😃

I really do not like to hold hands and I usually sit at the end of a pew next to a column so I do not have to do a hands across the aisle either. However, yesterday I sat in a different pew (the second one from the altar) next to a couple of friends and I ended up holding hands because I did not want to bring attention to myself. One of my friends that knows me quite well was surprised and pleased that at that point I decided to hold hands. I have to admit that it was somehow a distraction and that next time I will try to sit again in my usual spot. I am in a parish where sometime people grab your hand or hold on your shoulder if you do not hold hands.
 
The showtunes thing…again, I don’t see the point of you saying something like that.

As far as “foisting a practice on the liturgy that has no business being there”: This might be getting to the heart of the discussion. I totally respect that sentiment. You may be suprised that I actually agree with you here. But now that holding hands is, for better or for worse, a common practice in a lot of parishes…what do you think should be done? Why hasn’t the Church tossed it out yet?
(Me, sticking my two cents in again.😉 ). The Church seems very slow to make decisions. I think that it is because they want to give things very careful and studious thought. Also, it seems that there is so much on the Vatican’s plate that they might not have gotten to it yet. After all, they have the whole world to deal with. We just have a small part of it.

I do appreciate the outward sign of fellowship, but I don’t think that holding hands has anything to do with the Our Father prayer itself, doesn’t try to add or take anything away from it. It’s just what we’re doing with our hands as we stand and pray together w/ the rest of the church. There is nothing wrong with that. How does it make our prayer less “solemn”? It does show the community of the church, but in no way is this to the detriment of the Sacrifice, nor does it get in the way of our prayer to the Father. If you still insist that it does either of these two things, please explain exactly how…because obviously a whole lot of people aren’t seeing it. Well, for me it is a major distraction. When I’m praying the Our Father, I’m trying to concentrate on the words. Each part of it is important to me and it is just too easy for me to get distracted. It only takes a second of distraction and I’ve missed an important part of the prayer.
 
Has anyone else noticed their neighbors taking out that hand sanitizer gel and rubbing their hands and handing it down the pew to their family right after the kiss of peace. I think it is so funny because first they have this attitude like “Don’t you dare resist my hands!”:mad: and then they are the ones that go and sanitize.😛
lol. I’ve never seen this, but it sounds just obnoxious.
Don’t pull out your sanitizer at mass!

I do wish the sign of peace was at a different place in the mass.
It’s distracting especially when you’re with kids. The sign of peace is most kids’ favorite part of the mass and it usually gets them kind of happy and energized…Not a bad thing, but not great at the Agnus Dei.

My family does the hug thing (only with other family members) during the sign of peace. I have to admit that it’s kind of distracting, although I do like it. Most of the time I am by myself at mass, so it’s not an issue. It’s also distracting when the couple in front of you seems to think the sign of peace is an opportunity for a make-out session.
 
When I have gone to a parish where it’s not as common to hold hands (or the TLM, for instance) I have no problem whatsoever not doing it!
What is it about the TLM Mass that makes you feel that hand-holding there is inappropriate, yet it’s acceptable at the ordinary form of the Mass? Is the TLM any more of a Mass than the ordinary form?

There are no rubrics preventing hand-holding in the TLM, just as there aren’t any for the ordinary form of the Mass, yet why do you apply a double standard?

Has a special dispensation been given that makes handholding in the ordinary form of the Mass acceptable, or is the real issue here the idea that we can add whatever practice we want based on mere personal preference?
 
What is it about the TLM Mass that makes you feel that hand-holding there is inappropriate, yet it’s acceptable at the ordinary form of the Mass? Is the TLM any more of a Mass than the ordinary form?

There are no rubrics preventing hand-holding in the TLM, just as there aren’t any for the ordinary form of the Mass, yet why do you apply a double standard?

Has a special dispensation been given that makes handholding in the ordinary form of the Mass acceptable, or is the real issue here the idea that we can add whatever practice we want based on mere personal preference?
Where does she claims that it is inappropriate to hold hands at the TLM. From her post, following the double negation, I simply read that she accepts the fact that people at the TLM do not hold hands and that she follows that costume.
 
Where does she claims that it is inappropriate to hold hands at the TLM.
I didn’t say that she said that (please see post 63).
I simply read that she accepts the fact that people at the TLM do not hold hands and that she follows that costume.
As did I, hence my questions.
 
What is it about the TLM Mass that makes you feel that hand-holding there is inappropriate, yet it’s acceptable at the ordinary form of the Mass? Is the TLM any more of a Mass than the ordinary form?

There are no rubrics preventing hand-holding in the TLM, just as there aren’t any for the ordinary form of the Mass, yet why do you apply a double standard?

Has a special dispensation been given that makes handholding in the ordinary form of the Mass acceptable, or is the real issue here the idea that we can add whatever practice we want based on mere personal preference?
What I meant is that people don’t hold hands during the Our Father at the TLM, so I follow that custom, like Cristiano said. (Thanks, btw.) I’m not going to grab anyone’s hand. As I’ve said, I’m not exactly an apologist for hand-holding. Sometimes I enjoy it; mostly I could take it or leave it. (But I should never have even brought up my own preferences because that’s not the point, although it is what you’ve chosen to reply to.)

At the masses I go to, holding hands during the Our Father is the norm. Has nothing to do with my personal preference. I never said that it was part of the rubrics or should be. Just that people have done it for a long time, there is some meaning behind it, the Church knows people do it, and there’s nothing wrong with it. Period.
 
It doesn’t appear that anyone read JimG’s link to the question on the “Ask an Apologist” forum…so here is the text:
The Roman Missal does not allow for the faithful to raise their hands in the “orans” position (or hold hands) during Mass. Such posture is reserved for the priest.
Article 6:
§ 2. … In eucharistic celebrations deacons and non-ordained members of the faithful may not pronounce prayers — e.g. especially the eucharistic prayer, with its concluding doxology — or any other parts of the liturgy reserved to the celebrant priest. Neither may deacons or non-ordained members of the faithful use gestures or actions which are proper to the same priest celebrant.”\QUOTE]
I found this link that does a good job of explaining the source of confusion and the outcome:
adoremus.org/1103OransPosture.html
 
I thought the Our Father was considered a vertical prayer (meaning directly from the person towards Our Father) and not a horizontal prayer (meaning a prayer stretching horizontally towards our neighbors and then up). I know it says “Our Father” but I still thought I heard that it was a vertical prayer.

Something about holding hands and lifting them up bothers me. It doesn’t seem properly liturgical. Fortunetly, I’m a church organist so unless I’m not playing, I don’t have to worry about it. I did have an older woman I know insist that I hold her hand once. She seems to think that it’s the proper thing to do. 😦
Susan, I think that’s an excellent point. I personally don’t advocate hand-holding at Mass, but I’ve always felt that if you’re going to do it - wouldn’t it make more sense during the Nicaean Creed? That’s when we profess our unity.
 
The Roman Missal does not allow for the faithful to raise their hands in the “orans” position (or hold hands) during Mass. Such posture is reserved for the priest.
I wonder if this also covers the “and also with you” gesture that some people make in response to the priest. Y’all know what I’m talking about? It just occurred to me that this is also a “priest” gesture, as is the orans.

Re: Holding hands—> This issue is not that important to me. The debate, however, goes way over the top here and is entertaining to read. I guess that’s why I’ve replied. I am sorry for the sarcasm/snark in some of my responses. I needed some perspective, and guess I found it just now re-reading over the entire thread.
 
I wonder if this also covers the “and also with you” gesture that some people make in response to the priest. Y’all know what I’m talking about? It just occurred to me that this is also a “priest” gesture, as is the orans.
I think when I wrote about this earlier, this was part of what I had in mind, as the gesture is (to my eyes, anyway) a brief, modified orans gesture that essentially mimics the priest’s gesture.
Re: Holding hands
—> This issue is not that important to me. The debate, however, goes way over the top here and is entertaining to read. I guess that’s why I’ve replied. I am sorry for the sarcasm/snark in some of my responses. I needed some perspective, and guess I found it just now re-reading over the entire thread.
Fair enough, AC…I’ll give some additional perspective.

Some of us did not grow up in the Catholic Church. In my case, growing up, I was nominally Methodist; I can’t even say we were C&E Christians at this point, because I don’t recall any Christmas we went to church and could probably count the number of Easters we attended on the fingers of one hand, and have leftovers.

Around age 19, I had some health issues which lead to what many might term a “conversion experience.” A high school buddy I talked to decided to take me out to his church. It was a far cry from Methodism, that’s for sure. It was a Pentecostal church, and for those that are in the know, a so-called “Oneness” Pentecostal church at that. There was plenty of “praise and worship”, holding hands, laying on of hands, and other “stuff.” What seemed to be lacking (although I didn’t recognize it at the time) was the sense of the sacred. It was as though there was an unwritten 11th commandment that said, “Thou shalt not leave more than two seconds unfilled with noise of some sort.” It wasn’t unusual for services to last 3-4 hours, and it was non-stop pandemonium the whole time.

After about 8 years in that church, I left after some doctrinal disputes (I had the unmitigated temerity to insist that the doctrine of the Trinity was scriptural.) After bouncing from one church to another (almost all of them were Pentecostal/Charismatic to one extent or another), I settled on the Assemblies of God. There were some good folks there, I enjoyed myself, and even began the process of seeking my ministry papers (for lack of a better term, “ordination” in that denomination.) About the same time I started listening to this wacky nun on the shortwave radio. She was a hoot and I enjoyed her sense of humor, and her holiness, which came through despite my doctrinal reservations. I also listened to some former Protestant ministers like Scott Hahn, Marcus Grodi, Jeff Cavins, etc. I was a little flummoxed that folks from my background would actually become Catholic! It was fairly common to find ex-Catholics in the Assemblies of God, but the other way around had simply been inconceivable.

Well, long story short…I made that fatal mistake. I eventually attended my first Mass. It was all over. Here was what I had been missing, hidden behind all the hooplah and fanfare. The sense of the sacred. To a starving soul, just crossing the threshold of the church and sensing … something. I couldn’t put my finger on it then, but it was most assuredly Christ’s presence. There was peace. Solemnity. That ineffible attraction that one who thirsts has while being drawn to the Living Water. I was… home. THIS was my pearl of great price!

So to me, when I see other “things” that distract from what I have come to hold as sacred, my frustration shows. Holding hands in and of itself is not an issue for me, and to be honest, in a setting outside the Mass, I’d likely welcome it. What distracts and annoys me is the cavalier sense with which some inject their own spin on things into something they have no business monkeying with. The liturgy is sacrosanct. One does not “tinker” with the details, no matter how seemingly small or “harmless” they may be. I’ve studied the history of the Mass, and even in some of the smallest gestures or prayers, there is significance. For instance, in the prayers over the gifts, those prayers are virtually unchanged from their Judaic roots. There is a 3,500 year precedent for that one little prayer! Can you see if we start meddling willy-nilly and flying fast-and-loose with the details, we’d eventually have a Mess instead of a Mass. And all it took was one little change.
 
I think when I wrote about this earlier, this was part of what I had in mind, as the gesture is (to my eyes, anyway) a brief, modified orans gesture that essentially mimics the priest’s gesture.

Fair enough, AC…I’ll give some additional perspective.

Some of us did not grow up in the Catholic Church. In my case, growing up, I was nominally Methodist; I can’t even say we were C&E Christians at this point, because I don’t recall any Christmas we went to church and could probably count the number of Easters we attended on the fingers of one hand, and have leftovers.

Around age 19, I had some health issues which lead to what many might term a “conversion experience.” A high school buddy I talked to decided to take me out to his church. It was a far cry from Methodism, that’s for sure. It was a Pentecostal church, and for those that are in the know, a so-called “Oneness” Pentecostal church at that. There was plenty of “praise and worship”, holding hands, laying on of hands, and other “stuff.” What seemed to be lacking (although I didn’t recognize it at the time) was the sense of the sacred. It was as though there was an unwritten 11th commandment that said, “Thou shalt not leave more than two seconds unfilled with noise of some sort.” It wasn’t unusual for services to last 3-4 hours, and it was non-stop pandemonium the whole time.

After about 8 years in that church, I left after some doctrinal disputes (I had the unmitigated temerity to insist that the doctrine of the Trinity was scriptural.) After bouncing from one church to another (almost all of them were Pentecostal/Charismatic to one extent or another), I settled on the Assemblies of God. There were some good folks there, I enjoyed myself, and even began the process of seeking my ministry papers (for lack of a better term, “ordination” in that denomination.) About the same time I started listening to this wacky nun on the shortwave radio. She was a hoot and I enjoyed her sense of humor, and her holiness, which came through despite my doctrinal reservations. I also listened to some former Protestant ministers like Scott Hahn, Marcus Grodi, Jeff Cavins, etc. I was a little flummoxed that folks from my background would actually become Catholic! It was fairly common to find ex-Catholics in the Assemblies of God, but the other way around had simply been inconceivable.

Well, long story short…I made that fatal mistake. I eventually attended my first Mass. It was all over. Here was what I had been missing, hidden behind all the hooplah and fanfare. The sense of the sacred. To a starving soul, just crossing the threshold of the church and sensing … something. I couldn’t put my finger on it then, but it was most assuredly Christ’s presence. There was peace. Solemnity. That ineffible attraction that one who thirsts has while being drawn to the Living Water. I was… home. THIS was my pearl of great price!

So to me, when I see other “things” that distract from what I have come to hold as sacred, my frustration shows. Holding hands in and of itself is not an issue for me, and to be honest, in a setting outside the Mass, I’d likely welcome it. What distracts and annoys me is the cavalier sense with which some inject their own spin on things into something they have no business monkeying with. The liturgy is sacrosanct. One does not “tinker” with the details, no matter how seemingly small or “harmless” they may be. I’ve studied the history of the Mass, and even in some of the smallest gestures or prayers, there is significance. For instance, in the prayers over the gifts, those prayers are virtually unchanged from their Judaic roots. There is a 3,500 year precedent for that one little prayer! Can you see if we start meddling willy-nilly and flying fast-and-loose with the details, we’d eventually have a Mess instead of a Mass. And all it took was one little change.
:clapping: Very well said!

Now, have you ever considered studying for the priesthood?
 
:clapping: Very well said!

Now, have you ever considered studying for the priesthood?
Funny you should mention that.

I would give ANYTHING to be a priest! And in fact, even during RCIA, my priest was in the process of trying to find out what dispensations might be obtained to start me training for the deaconate (normally, there’s a 2 year waiting period before you can start the program.) He had already entrusted me with being the parish’s historian.

Unfortunately, “life” happened and not only did I not get a chance to start the deacon program, I didn’t even get to finish RCIA. Although I’ve been to first confession, I have not yet received the rest of the initiatory sacraments. Technically, I’m not Catholic yet.

😊

Among other things, my health is an issue. At this point, I can’t even get out to attend weekly Mass. I would so love to at the very least be confirmed and receive First Holy Communion. The trick is finding a priest or DRE who would be willing to meet with me at my home, assess my understanding of the faith, and determine what needs to be done to finish my requirements so I can partake in the sacraments.

Makes me want to cry sometimes. I’m guessing this is just my cross. If so, I’ll try to bear it gladly. I just need some food for the journey. I so desperately want to partake in the Holy Eucharist, it’s an insatiable hunger. Some day…some day.
 
Among other things, my health is an issue. At this point, I can’t even get out to attend weekly Mass. I would so love to at the very least be confirmed and receive First Holy Communion. The trick is finding a priest or DRE who would be willing to meet with me at my home, assess my understanding of the faith, and determine what needs to be done to finish my requirements so I can partake in the sacraments.

Makes me want to cry sometimes. I’m guessing this is just my cross. If so, I’ll try to bear it gladly. I just need some food for the journey. I so desperately want to partake in the Holy Eucharist, it’s an insatiable hunger. Some day…some day.
Thank you for these posts.
This is, indeed, a valuable perspective. Your love and loyalty to the church is extremely inspiring.

You are in the middle of NY and there’s not a priest who will come to you…? There has to be something that can be done to get this moving…
Have you tried to put out some feelers on this forum…? Maybe someone in CAF-land in the NY dioscese knows somebody who knows somebody else, etc. who can get this taken care of for you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top