V
vppoole
Guest
I’m not sure if scientists do this, but has there been a test to determine if the placebo effect is stronger than the effects of verified medicines that an individual does not have confidence in? This is different than a double blind procedure. What if person A received a placebo and demonstrated much hope in getting better through the placebo, while person B received a legitimate medicine that he or she was convinced did not work in the slightest, and of course they had the same malady? What would the results be, and would they be the same for all illnesses and severities? To play the Devil’s Advocate, is it possible that the strength of a person’s belief about being healed might have a significant effect on his or her own healing?
If so, then wouldn’t fostering severe doubt and depression on the effectiveness of one’s medicines potentially diminish or nullify the medicines’ effects on the individual’s weak health, especially if the particular medicine is not very empirically effective anyway? (After all, there still are several diseases that currently remain mysteries to scientists.)
In such cases, could one reasonably place more trust in a treatment they believe works in some mysterious way (placebo effect), provided that the treatment is not something chemically detrimental to his or her health?
So to make a long story a little longer, for individuals with fragile health, unsolved diseases, and weak or non-effective medicines, couldn’t a person with limited time available to them reasonably choose to place the majority of their hope and trust in the very act of believing in a cure of some other or any sort?
I am not saying that people should not go to hospitals for medical treatment, but rather that there are some instances when modern medicine does not have an effective solution. And in these uncertain instances sometimes the best solution is the solution that brings forth the most hope and determination of the patient to live. This I would argue is not mainstream homeopathy, though.
Pax!
If so, then wouldn’t fostering severe doubt and depression on the effectiveness of one’s medicines potentially diminish or nullify the medicines’ effects on the individual’s weak health, especially if the particular medicine is not very empirically effective anyway? (After all, there still are several diseases that currently remain mysteries to scientists.)
In such cases, could one reasonably place more trust in a treatment they believe works in some mysterious way (placebo effect), provided that the treatment is not something chemically detrimental to his or her health?
So to make a long story a little longer, for individuals with fragile health, unsolved diseases, and weak or non-effective medicines, couldn’t a person with limited time available to them reasonably choose to place the majority of their hope and trust in the very act of believing in a cure of some other or any sort?
I am not saying that people should not go to hospitals for medical treatment, but rather that there are some instances when modern medicine does not have an effective solution. And in these uncertain instances sometimes the best solution is the solution that brings forth the most hope and determination of the patient to live. This I would argue is not mainstream homeopathy, though.
Pax!