St. Jeanne d’Arc,
Sorry for my oversenstive reaction. This is a conservative Catholic board and if I come here I shouldn’t expect otherwise. I appreciate your kindness and humility in responding as you have. I’m touchy these days because frankly I don’t think I can go on being an Anglican any longer (certainly not an Episcopalian, and with all due respect to GKC I’m not sure that any of the other Anglican options are live ones for me). Being the ornery sort of guy I am, I stick up for Anglicanism most stubbornly precisely at the point where I’ve more or less given up on it myself. I guess I figure on some level that this is causing me so much distress that smug Catholics have no business sounding off on it in what I often think are rather simplistic ways.
As for the Virginia analogy, my point is that in at least one Anglican view the Church really is rather like the Southern view of the U.S. I quite recognize that Catholics think otherwise–you are, so to speak, staunch Unionists. But in Anglican self-identity the “particular church” remains itself whether it is part of a larger whole or not, which is not to say that being part of the larger whole is unimportant. I don’t expect Catholics to agree–I’m simply saying that you won’t get very far with Anglicans saying things like “Henry VIII founded your church.” You will get much further if you press us on whether we have legitimate reasons for remaining out of communion with Rome; or whether we have any ground for expecting national churches to listen to the Lambeth Conference when we refused to listen to the Council of Trent (or for that matter a number of previous councils from II Nicea to Florence, even though some of us see ourselves as bound by at least some of those); or whether the Nicene Creed to which we hold so firmly (take or leave the odd heretical bishop) would ever have been adopted if the early Church had acted by Anglican principles. These, at least for me, are the really troubling issues.
In Christ,
Edwin