Honest Question for those who prefer EF

  • Thread starter Thread starter BennyBoy89
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Would you prefer the OF over the EF if it was celebrated properly (as V2 actually intended it)? I’m defining properly celebrated by the priest facing ad orientem, the incorporation of Latin, and no Oregon Catholic Press (😛 ). The dignity would along the lines of Trent, but the readings, prayers, etc would be according to V2.

Would you still prefer the EF?
No.

Restore the Offertory prayers…for one
Restore all the rubrics that were there to protect

Restore all that was lost and elimnated because of …well what the liberals tell you…

I will say what Lefebvre said -

Put the EF Mass in 100 percent vernacular - and facing the people –

That is better than the OF in Latin and facing the altar.

It goes a LOT deeper than the OF celebrated properly…the OF has to be thrown in the dumpster and a new “reform” must take place - to get BACK to what we had in 1962 to see what in the heck went wrong with the “reform”.

Ken
 
The rubrics and the GIRM never say at all that it is improper to allow chimpanzees in tutus into the sanctuary during consecration. Surely, then, such a practice is allowed, right? Since the text doesn’t forbid it.
I’m not going to waste my time attempting to dialogue with someone who feels that “chimpanzees in tutus in the sanctuary during consecration” compares with “Mass in the vernacular”.

:rolleyes:
 
Come on, for crying out loud! How can you possibly continue to ignore that text which you say you’ve seen pasted countless times. It should be pasted more, since apparently it hasn’t sunk in yet!
Cut and Paste,

Cut and Paste,

Cut and Paste…

Anyone can sit in front of a computer, working the search engines for snippets that support their position. The question is, what is in your hearts and minds? How do you LIVE your Faith daily?

I rarely, if ever use “cut and paste” argument. I speak from life experience. Save for the occasional part-time/substitute teaching gigs, I have spent my whole life in the business world.

I am well versed in the methods of manipulation of graphs, charts, numbers, and verbage. Cut and Paste arguments are meaningless to me. They do not necessarily demonstrate one’s beliefs or knowledge…only their computer manipulation skills.

Read the posts of people like Deacon Ed B, or JREducation. They speak from their hearts and minds. What’s in yours?

👍
 
I’m not going to waste my time attempting to dialogue with someone who feels that “chimpanzees in tutus in the sanctuary during consecration” compares with “Mass in the vernacular”.

:rolleyes:
How did I know that you were going to jump on the analogy and ignore the actual argument:shrug:
 
How did I know that you were going to jump on the analogy and ignore the actual argument:shrug:
The argument is clear. Traditionalists like to interpret such commentary as mandatory to suit their agenda, when clearly it is NOT mandatory.

Been there, done that, got the tee shirt. :cool:
 
The argument is clear. Traditionalists like to interpret such commentary as mandatory to suit their agenda, when clearly it is NOT mandatory.

Been there, done that, got the tee shirt. :cool:
The only thing that’s clear is that you have ignored Sacrosanctum Concilium. You asked what constitutes a properly celebrated OF, when provided with relevant text, you chose to evade it.

Here it is again:

From SACROSANCTUM CONCILIUM:

36. 1. Particular law remaining in force, the use of the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin rites.
  1. In Masses which are celebrated with the people, a suitable place may be allotted to their mother tongue. This is to apply in the first place to the readings and “the common prayer,” but also, as local conditions may warrant, to those parts which pertain to the people, according to tho norm laid down in Art. 36 of this Constitution.
    **Nevertheless steps should be taken so that the faithful may also be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them. **
120.** In the Latin Church the pipe organ is to be held in high esteem, for it is the traditional musical instrument which adds a wonderful splendor to the Church’s ceremonies and powerfully lifts up man’s mind to God and to higher things.**
 
The only thing that’s clear is that you have ignored Sacrosanctum Concilium. You asked what constitutes a properly celebrated OF, when provided with relevant text, you chose to evade it.
Cut and Paste until your fingers fall off if you like. The Holy Spirit guides the Pope, who presides over the Bishops and Priests.

Obviously they interpret the document differently than you do. Where my soul is concerned I will submit to the authority of the Church, not an anonymous internet poster who thinks they know Church teaching better than the Church itself and it’s clergy.

Several Mass prayers are said in Latin in our parish, and we use a pipe organ too…but the Mass is said in the vernacular and we use guitars and a piano also. It is not prohibited, any more than Latin and organs are mandatory.
 
Cut and Paste until your fingers fall off if you like. The Holy Spirit guides the Pope, who presides over the Bishops and Priests.

Obviously they interpret the document differently than you do. Where my soul is concerned I will submit to the authority of the Church, not an anonymous internet poster who thinks they know Church teaching better than the Church itself and it’s clergy.

Several Mass prayers are said in Latin in our parish, and we use a pipe organ too…but the Mass is said in the vernacular and we use guitars and a piano also. It is not prohibited, any more than Latin and organs are mandatory.
I think Cardinal Arinze once spoke out against guitar use during Mass on the grounds it is a secular instrument. Not sure about the specifics though.
 
Cut and Paste until your fingers fall off if you like. The Holy Spirit guides the Pope, who presides over the Bishops and Priests.

Obviously they interpret the document differently than you do. Where my soul is concerned I will submit to the authority of the Church, not an anonymous internet poster who thinks they know Church teaching better than the Church itself and it’s clergy.

Several Mass prayers are said in Latin in our parish, and we use a pipe organ too…but the Mass is said in the vernacular and we use guitars and a piano also. It is not prohibited, any more than Latin and organs are mandatory.
You can accuse us of “cut and paste” all you want, just remember that we’re citing official Church documents.

I don’t know about you but SC 36 seems clear to me:
36. 1. Particular law remaining in force, the use of the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin rites.
 
From SACROSANCTUM CONCILIUM:

36. 1. Particular law remaining in force, the use of the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin rites.
  1. In Masses which are celebrated with the people, a suitable place may be allotted to their mother tongue. This is to apply in the first place to the readings and “the common prayer,” but also, as local conditions may warrant, to those parts which pertain to the people, according to tho norm laid down in Art. 36 of this Constitution.
    **Nevertheless steps should be taken so that the faithful may also be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them. **
120.** In the Latin Church the pipe organ is to be held in high esteem, for it is the traditional musical instrument which adds a wonderful splendor to the Church’s ceremonies and powerfully lifts up man’s mind to God and to higher things.**
I’m not very knowledgable about liturgy. Needless to say, I’ve only ever witnessed one prayer said in Latin at the OF (Agnus Dei), and I’ve never heard a piece of Gregorian Chant outside the EF.

Could you briefly describe what a Mass like this would be like? What parts would be in Latin and what parts wouldn’t?
 
Yep. Actually, if more people were lectors, they would get a better up close and personal view of things, like the aforementioned example. Lotsa little things going on that Average Joe Catholic out in the pew may not notice.
Does that mean that we can’t truly fully participate unless we’re fulfilling some ministry like Lector or EMHC or altar server? Because that is certainly not what Vatican II meant by “full, conscious, and active participation”…

And there’s no reason Average Joe Catholic can’t be taught about what’s going on in the liturgy (that he might not otherwise notice) by the priest, during a homily, or by some other means (extra-liturgical catechesis).
 
Does that mean that we can’t truly fully participate unless we’re fulfilling some ministry like Lector or EMHC or altar server? Because that is certainly not what Vatican II meant by “full, conscious, and active participation”…

And there’s no reason Average Joe Catholic can’t be taught about what’s going on in the liturgy (that he might not otherwise notice) by the priest, during a homily, or by some other means (extra-liturgical catechesis).
I didn’t say that. You are putting words in my mouth. I said:

*Lotsa little things going on that Average Joe Catholic out in the pew **may not *notice.

Which was said in response to…(Lily M) the Prayers over the Gifts, for example, will be said by the priest to himself, either while a hymn is being sung or while the congregation sits in silence.
 
I didn’t say that. You are putting words in my mouth. I said: *Lotsa little things going on that Average Joe Catholic out in the pew **may not ***notice.
I put no words in your mouth, I asked for clarification. Because, believe it or not, there are some Catholics who think that until we’re all lectoring or cantoring or EMHCing, etc., we’re not fully participating enough.
 
Yes I would still prefer the EF. But I would not feel so out of place while attending the OF if those changes that you want would be implemented.
 
I put no words in your mouth, I asked for clarification. Because, believe it or not, there are some Catholics who think that until we’re all lectoring or cantoring or EMHCing, etc., we’re not fully participating enough.
Well, the level of participation for those attending the OF as compared to those who attend the EF is so much more…
:bigyikes: :bigyikes: :bigyikes: INCOMING !! :bigyikes: :bigyikes: :bigyikes:
 
Well, the level of participation for those attending the OF as compared to those who attend the EF is so much more…
Code:
        :bigyikes: :bigyikes: :bigyikes: INCOMING !! :bigyikes: :bigyikes: :bigyikes:
Yes incoming - hogwash.

So if I’m not a lector at the OF I participate less???
 
Yes incoming - hogwash.

So if I’m not a lector at the OF I participate less???
I did NOT say that…we all participate at the OF.

What I SAID was…that those who lector MAY catch little nuances that the folks in the pews MAY not…

Just like those who feel that altar boys get an up close and personal look at the priest during Mass.

There was no slam, denigration, or put-down meant in any way, no way, no how.

My “incoming” comment was a playful poke as to how OF attendees “participate” moreso than EF attendees…
 
My “incoming” comment was a playful poke as to how OF attendees “participate” moreso than EF attendees…
I would say that I get to participate more if I can speak my responses in Latin and can hear and sing some of the Gregorian chant of the Mass. I also get to participate more if my posture is not impinged upon by missing kneelers. Also if there’s ample moments of silence for personal recollective prayer.
 
I’m not going to waste my time attempting to dialogue with someone who feels that “chimpanzees in tutus in the sanctuary during consecration” compares with “Mass in the vernacular”.

:rolleyes:
Judging from the posts of your past, it wouldnt be a dialogue anyway. it would be you refusing to read or comprehend the official documents of the Church and coming up with some ludicrously ignorant way to justidy your excuse for theology.
Anyone can sit in front of a computer, working the search engines for snippets that support their position. The question is, what is in your hearts and minds? How do you LIVE your Faith daily?
I don’t like your subtle hint that i somehow dont live my faith or have it on my heart and mind just because I don’t agree with you. How do i live my faith? I invite my protestant friends to mass. I explain Catholic tehology to non-catholics. I defend the Church in class when secularists bash us. I pray rosaries and chaplets. I attend mass every sunday and on holy days, and go to confession regularly about every 2 weeks. I have talked to both bishops and pastors, including at the local Greek Orthodox parish and the Coptic bishop of California, and have asked them about re-union with Catholicism. I received two religious medals during my time in the Scouting program, which saw fit to bestow upon me the Eagle Award. I pray for the Church, its holy Traditions, its unity, and for us all to be made more like God, so that we might reflect his glory and majesty in our everyday life.

And I’m still not good enough for the perfect and all-holy YOU?
**I rarely, if ever use “cut and paste” argument. **I speak from life experience. Save for the occasional part-time/substitute teaching gigs, I have spent my whole life in the business world.

I am well versed in the methods of manipulation of graphs, charts, numbers, and verbage. Cut and Paste arguments are meaningless to me. They do not necessarily demonstrate one’s beliefs or knowledge…only their computer manipulation skills.

Read the posts of people like Deacon Ed B, or JREducation. They speak from their hearts and minds. What’s in yours?
Thats because you rarely, if ever, make any arguments. Arguments require proof to back them up, which is why we cite OFFICIAL CHURCH DOCUMENTS!

When you say you speak “from life experience,” all i hear is you telling me that your life experience is better and more meaningful than the life experiences of 1,960 years of Catholics who built up what you want to throw out.

Your desire to use your “life experiences” is just an arrogant and ignorant way of saying that the Church, and her official documents, have no role in your life unless you agree with them. If they dont mesh with tour “life experiences” then you get to ignore them, and riducle those who DO heed them! I wonde rif anybody else here is as completely fed up with your ridiculous prejudice against traditional Catholics as I am!!
How did I know that you were going to jump on the analogy and ignore the actual argument:shrug:
I didn’t see any argument there; i saw a weak and downright stupid excuse to ignore what the Church has set down! You say traiditionalists think we know more than the Church? Well then why is it you who is deciding that YOU know what needs to be followed or not followed?
The argument is clear. Traditionalists like to interpret such commentary as mandatory to suit their agenda, when clearly it is NOT mandatory.

Been there, done that, got the tee shirt. :cool:
You’re saying that what is in the GIRM and rubrics is not mandatory? That flies in the face of the Pope, the Magisterium, and THE TRUTH! Since when has any law ever been optional?
Cut and Paste until your fingers fall off if you like. The Holy Spirit guides the Pope, who presides over the Bishops and Priests.

Obviously they interpret the document differently than you do. Where my soul is concerned I will submit to the authority of the Church, not an anonymous internet poster who thinks they know Church teaching better than the Church itself and it’s clergy.
The Pope AGREES with us!! HE is the one advocating greate ruse of Latin, of Chant, of tradition! He has said so in all his documents. And for people like you who refuse to read or obey any official Church documents, you can just look at his “life experiences” and what actions he has taken: new papal MC. New sistine choir director. new vestments. traditional ferula. traditional throne. Traditional CATHOLICISM!
Several Mass prayers are said in Latin in our parish, and we use a pipe organ too…but the Mass is said in the vernacular and we use guitars and a piano also. It is not prohibited, any more than Latin and organs are mandatory.
I am sincerely glad for you and your parish! I love knowing that parsihes such as that exist, because they are rare! Realize that! I amsubjected to liturgical dance, drums, rock music, and improvised prayers many times when i attend mass! The rest of us want a parish more like yours! Stop bashing our legs out from under as as we struggle for what you have been blessed with!
Well, the level of participation for those attending the OF as compared to those who attend the EF is so much more…
Anyone who understands what “participation” means knows this isnt true. We participate at mass not only by being a cantor or lector, but by praying the mass. The mass is a prayer, not a performance. Singing and reading are not the best ways to contribute. The best way is to fulfill your role as a layman, rather than try to encroach upon the roles of the the priest. We should pray along with the prayers of the mass, thinking about what they mean, and asking oursleves how we can use the mass to better our lives and the lives of others. THAT is what participation means, and i am willing to guess that more people participate like that at a the Extraordinary Form!

Too many people at the OF just want to be entgertained!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top