S
Socrates4Jesus
Guest
Gotta go. I’ll return this evening.
I agree, God’s mercy is bountiful.My thinking is that a person might be deceived into doing the wrong things with a clear conscience that his motives are pure. Since he is deceived, it would seem just for God to show more mercy to him than one who was fully aware of the gravity of his own sin.
What, have we lost all hope here?Human Christian love is to will and act for the good of ourselves or another, whether for God or created beings. However, human love, being subject to frailties and ignorance, must be informed as to what is the good–especially the ultimate good–or else a will for the good may be unintentionally misplaced or even counterproductive. Hence, human Christian faith is necessary in order to inform one of the ultimate good for all.[/INDENT]
Yes, faith must exist in order for there to be something to hope in.It might be that the only disagreement as to definitions to this point is regarding Hope. When i look into her beautifully innocent (and often naive) eyes, i see that she is the consequence, but not the cause of her sister Faith. Faith is the reason for Hope, not the result of it.
A possible problem I see here is that while faith is an assent to the truth of those promises, it is not a placing of ones trust in them, at least when we’re referring to the Catholic concept of the virtue of faith as we are here, even though in common usage faith often does imply trust. Hope is not to be relegated to too lowly a position because it is also a supernaturally endowed gift, the ability to want and trust in the promises faith informs us of.It appears to be saying that Faith is the cause or reason for Hope, for if i were to ask, “Why do i hope in God?” the answer the text gives me is, “because you first placed your trust (i.e., faith) in Christ’s promises.”
We’re given the knowledge (beliefs) -and the ability to believe that they are true- with the virtue of faith. We’re given the confidence that these truths will lead us to eternal life with the virtue of hope. I believe that this is related to James’ statement that even demons believe, but tremble. They have faith in God but no hope that His promises apply to them.For, as said earlier, it is irrational or even insane to hope in something one has no trust at all is true.
No, just trying to keep the definitions of Faith and Hope separate from one another.What, have we lost all hope here?
Fascinating! Reminds me of discussions i’ve had with others regarding the meaning of believe. Three meanings of believe to consider areA possible problem I see here is that while faith is an assent to the truth of those promises, it is not a placing of ones trust in them, at least when we’re referring to the Catholic concept of the virtue of faith as we are here, even though in common usage faith often does imply trust. Hope is not to be relegated to too lowly a position because it is also a supernaturally endowed gift, the ability to want and trust in the promises faith informs us of.
Perhaps. If you agree with the series of cause and effect i suggested, then we might be saying the same thing. Please tell me whether you believe this is true or not:We’re given the knowledge (beliefs) -and the ability to believe that they are true- with the virtue of faith. We’re given the confidence that these truths will lead us to eternal life with the virtue of hope. I believe that this is related to James’ statement that even demons believe, but tremble. They have faith in God but no hope that His promises apply to them.
The Catholic Encyclopedia puts it like this:
“Looked at in this way it [hope] is defined to be a Divine virtue by which we confidently expect, with God’s help, to reach eternal felicity as well as to have at our disposal the means of securing it.”
Are we saying the same thing?
Yes. So, do you think i’m correct in suggesting that knowledge causes faith, which causes hope, which causes love of God?I agree, God’s mercy is bountiful.
So, strong faith gives us a clear heard so as not to be deceived, and hope strengthens our will so we have the courage to act rightly. In so doing one demonstrates true love, agape.
Yes, I believe so. We must first hear the Word -gain the knowledge- but we can’t actually believe or know it to be true except that the virtue of faith be given us. Next hope can adhere to the truths in confidence they’ll be done in our lives. Finally, perfected love is the desired end.Perhaps. If you agree with the series of cause and effect i suggested, then we might be saying the same thing. Please tell me whether you believe this is true or not:
Knowledge > Faith > Hope > Love
(i.e., knowledge causes faith, which causes hope, which causes love for God.)
It appears that you already believe that faith is a cause of hope. How about the rest?
The theological virtue of faith is to know or believe that something is true by supernatural means.Fascinating! Reminds me of discussions i’ve had with others regarding the meaning of believe. Three meanings of believe to consider are
To think that something might be true
Are you saying that depending on the strength of one’s faith, it might be any of these three?
- To know that something is true
- To put one’s trust in the something one knows is true
If I can say one thing, I disagree that strong faith always gives us a clear head. I think that means head, Because I think that you can be super strong in your faith, and still get clouded at times.I agree, God’s mercy is bountiful.
So, strong faith gives us a clear heard so as not to be deceived, and hope strengthens our will so we have the courage to act rightly. In so doing one demonstrates true love, agape.
We were speaking of “faith” as one of the theological virtues. This is a excerpt from the"Virtue" article in the Catholic Enclopedia.If I can say one thing, I disagree that strong faith always gives us a clear head. I think that means head, Because I think that you can be super strong in your faith, and still get clouded at times.
My example is Peter, He had more faith and Love for Jesus than any of the Apostles IMO. But then he got a little clouded in his thinking at times. I do not feel it had anything to do with his faith. I agree that Faith gets you back on the right track at times, but its still hard. Does that make any sense?
This implys that one who has perfected “faith”, has perfected the intellect. A perfected intellect cannot produce “cloudy” thinking.Faith is an infused virtue, by which the intellect is perfected by a supernatural light, in virtue of which, under a supernatural movement of the will, it assents firmly to the supernatural truths of Revelation, not on the motive of intrinsic evidence, but on the sole ground of the infallible authority of God revealing.
Oh okay, I see what you are saying, Then on that note I may have a different answer.We were speaking of “faith” as one of the theological virtues. This is a excerpt from the"Virtue" article in the Catholic Enclopedia.
This implys that one who has perfected “faith”, has perfected the intellect. A perfected intellect cannot produce “cloudy” thinking.
Okay now here is what I see. If a person is tricked into doing something and his conscience is clear and his motives are pure there is not sin there to get mercy for.My thinking is that a person might be deceived into doing the wrong things with a clear conscience that his motives are pure. Since he is deceived, it would seem just for God to show more mercy to him than one who was fully aware of the gravity of his own sin.
Perhaps you are correct.The theological virtue of faith is to know or believe that something is true by supernatural means.
Agreed! So it seems there is a fourth virtue, which me might call Wisdom, and you and i are good to call her the cause of the other three, for as Socrates tells us:Yes, I believe so. We must first hear the Word -gain the knowledge- but we can’t actually believe or know it to be true except that the virtue of faith be given us. Next hope can adhere to the truths in confidence they’ll be done in our lives. Finally, perfected love is the desired end.
Well said, Rinnie, and i believe Jesus agrees with you, for He said:Okay now here is what I see. If a person is tricked into doing something and his conscience is clear and his motives are pure there is not sin there to get mercy for.
But now the other guy. He is getting it worse. And God may not even have much Mercy on him. Because its bad enough to sin, but to cause others to sin, look out. That makes God even more upset. What is that bible verse for someone who is the cause of ones sin? I can’t remember it off the top of my head.
Huh???A will-o’-the-wisp, that stops people giving up when they ought to, by cheating them with the delusion that things will improve. Which is why it was in Pandora’s box - because it is an evil
Well, you suggested a variety of ways of valuing the virtues.If we’re to rank faith, hope and love according to inherent value I’d still say love’s the clear winner-it existed before the other two were even necessary-it always existed. If we rank them in terms of the possibility of a human being’s perfection relative to them, they could all be even. If we rank them in terms of their value for the purpose of achieving salvation, they’re all invaluable, along with other dispositions. We’re saved by being made holy as God is holy, perfect as He is perfect, sinless, and this perfection means to come to love perfectly-with our cooperation-faith being only one component of the process.Do you now see, my friend FH, what the consequences are of saying that Faith is the case of Hope and Love?