A
abcdefg
Guest
Holding agnostism believes for a long time looks incredible to me, are most of them cradle-agnostists or ex-theists half converted by atheists or ex-atheists half converted by theists?
And if there were a god, there wouldn’t be any foxholes in the first place.I liken my experience, to the old adage : there are no atheists in foxholes.
If God is greater than his creatures, his existence seems to cry out even louder for an explanation than theirs does.The other thing that buoys my belief is something called Intelligent Design, which mentions the
massive statistical improbabilty of neo-Darwinism.
Life is just not an “accident.”
It doesn’t hurt for us to hope. I pray too sometimes. Good luck to you.But on the days when just getting a
grocery list together seems unachievable, I pray
to the God that I’m not sure is there and I say:
“God, I cannot get done what needs to get done
today unless you help me.” More times than I
can count, He does.
reen12
If God is greater than his creatures, his existence seems to cry out even louder for an explanation than theirs does.The other thing that buoys my belief is something called Intelligent Design, which mentions the
massive statistical improbabilty of neo-Darwinism.
Life is just not an “accident.”
It doesn’t hurt for us to hope. I pray too sometimes. Good luck to you.But on the days when just getting a
grocery list together seems unachievable, I pray
to the God that I’m not sure is there and I say:
“God, I cannot get done what needs to get done
today unless you help me.” More times than I
can count, He does.
reen12
Wow… talk about taking the easy way out!And if there were a god, there wouldn’t be any foxholes in the first place.
Non-sequitor ridiculous statement. Are you in 7th grade?And if there were a god, there wouldn’t be any foxholes in the first place.
Non-sequitor ridiculous statement. Are you in 7th grade?
The problem of theodicy deserves a more thoughtful answer than a personal attack.Non-sequitor ridiculous statement. Are you in 7th grade?
I agree, that is why I asked him a question. I wanted to ensure that I was communicating at an appropriate level.The problem of theodicy deserves a more thoughtful answer than a personal attack.
And with this reply, you failed the test.I agree, that is why I asked him a question. I wanted to ensure that I was communicating at an appropriate level.