How are we saved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mesl4
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have to agree with notsmart.I’ll also add that it sounds quite arrogant to say we know with 100% certainty that we’re saved. At one time I would’ve thought it was a slap in Jesus face to say otherwise but now I know that only God knows our eternal destinies with that kind of certainty.
 
I’ll give it to you short and sweet, OK? Moondwellers version of the Gospel is very short - very, very short. We are saved instantly, completely and permanently at the time we come to true faith in Christ.
Yes, this is the point of contention…
Love and sin are irrelevent.
Or the other interpretation is correct. That’s another possibility. Your list here doesn’t convince me…I need specific data for each specific issue.
1John was written for unbelievers (gnostics)
No, he wrote to Christians…near the end (5:13) he writes “these things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life”. “These things” are generally descriptions of the behavior of the sons of God vs. the sons of the devil.

For instance…here’s one of “these things”…
1 Jn 3:14 "We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death. "

Love is a result of being saved. You know you are being saved because you love. I regard salvation as the whole process, ending with being saved from the condemnation of the world.
James is not speaking of salvation or eternal life - just temporal healing.
I disagree. “save his soul from death and cover a multitude of sins”…I believe this is eternal death. We’re not to fear man who can kill the body, but God who can kill the soul.
This does not refer to a believer who has strayed. This person was never saved.
If the person who strayed doesn’t repent but stays separated from God…you can say it two ways: 1) they were never elect (eternal perspective), and 2) they lost their salvation (temporal perspective).

But often the Bible gives us the temporal perspective…so it’s OK to teach this way. If the Bible does it, we can do it. (See my signature line…)

God bless you,
-BHM
 
MD - I am speaking some advanced concepts here and trying to get past your simplistic and naive view of salvation theology:

You just don’t get the most basics do you? We receive God’s Word into our Hearts as a seed falling into soil (humus - humanity). If our hearts are not stone and are not choked off by the weeds of despair or false teachings and distractions then God’s Word takes root. As we cooperate with God’s nourishing grace (the imagery of rain and seasons and sunlight is apropos here) we grow toward theosis (divine-human) to attain a level of divinity. At Christian fullness of maturity God recognizes His only Son, Jesus, in each of us and can love us as He loves His Son. In this saintly state we can then reciprocate that love fully and authentically in a way that overcomes an unequal yoke of love or an unauthentic and faux love that our debased and fallen human nature would otherwise limit us to.

Can’t you see it?? God wants us to be like Jesus! He wants us to be just like HIMSELF so he can love us on his terms with a real and authentic love that we can fully participate in. If we remained of simple human estate we could only love God in a dutiful way and in a very limited way. God wants more than that! He wants us to love Him at a level that is closer to His nature in a way that we will not feel inferior and inadequate and unworthy. The only way to do that is to elevate humanity by creating a new race of divine-human beings that take Jesus and Mary as the new prototype for his children. God in some mysterious sense learned to be human through The Incarnation - and now He wants to love us as a divine-human beings just as He loves Jesus. God can not accept an unauthentic love of duty or a love limited by the lower estate of our humanity. He raises us up so we may love Him in a way that is authentic.

Dude - we are to be in many ways just like Jesus - just like God!!!
The entire Creation is on pins and needles waiting for people to catch on. This is huge…

This is what you must grasp and believe.

James
Dude, you’re not describing Biblical salvation here: redemption, justification, reconciliation; but some sort of “Christian” (and I use that word quite loosely here) new age restoration. How sad! How sad, indeed.
 
How many of your sins did Christ bear on the cross? Can that which was laid on the Substitute be laid back on the sinner? Or did Christ die needlessly?
He died for all of the sin for the whole world for all time. So later, when we’re forgiven, God’s justice can be upheld. But we weren’t forgiven back then. I think we’re forgiven of past sins at our conversion, and future sins when we confess (1 Jn 1:9). He can save forever those that draw near to God through Him since He always lives to intercede (Heb 7:25).
What does this mean?Acts 10:43 “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.”
That’s the overall “what”…not the detailed “how”. We’ve got forgiveness of sins at baptism (Acts 22:16 - don’t delay, go and be baptized and wash away your sins), at confession (1 Jn 1:9), the anointing of the sick (James 5:14-15). So we know we’ve got future sins that aren’t forgiven yet…
**
Acts 13:38** “Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through Him forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you,”
Yes, it’s all through Him. Absolutely.
Acts 26:18 "…to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.’
Yes, the overall “what”…not the “how”. For an example of the “how”…the Lord disciplines us so that we won’t be condemned along with the world (1 Cor 11:32). So if we have true faith, the Lord will discipline us and cause us to repent - we’re sorry, confess, and we receive forgiveness. And this is “so that we won’t be condemned along with the world.”
Col 1:14 "in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.
Yes, it’s all through Jesus, His propitation for sin so God’s justice can be upheld. But these passages don’t contain the details.

God bless you,
-BHM
 
He died for all of the sin for the whole world for all time. So later, when we’re forgiven, God’s justice can be upheld. But we weren’t forgiven back then. I think we’re forgiven of past sins at our conversion, and future sins when we confess (1 Jn 1:9). He can save forever those that draw near to God through Him since He always lives to intercede (Heb 7:25).

That’s the overall “what”…not the detailed “how”. We’ve got forgiveness of sins at baptism (Acts 22:16 - don’t delay, go and be baptized and wash away your sins), at confession (1 Jn 1:9), the anointing of the sick (James 5:14-15). So we know we’ve got future sins that aren’t forgiven yet…

Yes, it’s all through Him. Absolutely.

Yes, the overall “what”…not the “how”. For an example of the “how”…the Lord disciplines us so that we won’t be condemned along with the world (1 Cor 11:32). So if we have true faith, the Lord will discipline us and cause us to repent - we’re sorry, confess, and we receive forgiveness. And this is “so that we won’t be condemned along with the world.”

Yes, it’s all through Jesus, His propitation for sin so God’s justice can be upheld. But these passages don’t contain the details.

God bless you,
-BHM
The believer is forgiven all his sins when he believers.

.
:extrahappy: OH HAPPY DAY!!!:extrahappy:
.
 
So, as you go along in life and commit new sins, do you have to be sorry, repent and ask for forgiveness each time?
In respect to those which Christ “bore in His body on the cross” (1 Pet. 2:24) there are no “new sins.” In that respect, if there was such a thing as “new sins,” then Christ died needlessly. And at best He would have to lay aside His resurrected, glorified body, return to the womb of another woman, be born and be crucified all over again and again and again and again and again and again and again - I think you get the point: BUT, says the writer of Hebrews via the Holy Spirit: Heb 9:26 "Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself."You present the unbiblical idea of an “initial” forgiveness similar to CentralFLJames’ unbiblical “initial” salvation connected to his new age restoration “gospel.”
 
God wants us to come to him with our sins, with our joys and with our whole hearts and minds and bodies worshipping him.
I can’t worship God if I feel I am too far above asking for forgiveness of my sins. I am thankful I have a loving Father who is always ready to hear from me of all these things, should only I pray and call out to him, because I need to humble myself to him. He is my Lord, and my God. Its simply not good enough for him to just be my Lord. He must be my God also, the one who I must worship with a clean, contrite heart.
 
In respect to those which Christ “bore in His body on the cross” (1 Pet. 2:24) there are no “new sins.” In that respect, if there was such a thing as “new sins,” then Christ died needlessly. And at best He would have to lay aside His resurrected, glorified body, return to the womb of another woman, be born and be crucified all over again and again and again and again and again and again and again - I think you get the point: BUT, says the writer of Hebrews via the Holy Spirit: Heb 9:26 "Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself."You present the unbiblical idea of an “initial” forgiveness similar to CentralFLJames’ unbiblical “initial” salvation connected to his new age restoration “gospel.”
Actually, they sound to me like the same old sins. Paul warns repeatedly that those who do such things will not inherit the Kingdom. He writes these warnings to believers.

Not everyone chooses to participate in the once for all sacrifice of christ for sins, and some choose to become partakers of HIm, then are cut off, or fall from grace. This is why they are spoken of as “spurning the Son of God afresh”. They spurned Him the first time by failing to receive Him as Lord and Christ. then after becoming believers, they turned again, and “spurn” him a second time. For such persons, there remains no sacrifice for sin. Since He is the only effiicacious sacrifce, those who become partakers of His grace, then turn away, have no sacrifice for their sins.

Sometimes I wonder why believers such as yourself who seem so mature in so many ways consistently spurn Paul’s instruction that one should not account oneself as having “attained”, but rather, the mature attitude is to consider oneself laying aside what lies behind and striving.
 
In respect to those which Christ “bore in His body on the cross” (1 Pet. 2:24) there are no “new sins.” In that respect, if there was such a thing as “new sins,” then Christ died needlessly. And at best He would have to lay aside His resurrected, glorified body, return to the womb of another woman, be born and be crucified all over again and again and again and again and again and again and again - I think you get the point: BUT, says the writer of Hebrews via the Holy Spirit: Heb 9:26 "Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself."You present the unbiblical idea of an “initial” forgiveness similar to CentralFLJames’ unbiblical “initial” salvation connected to his new age restoration “gospel.”
What you are missing is a biblical understanding of the role of a redeemer. Go read Leviticus 25. Even when purchased out of slavery the redeemed, under God’s law, could still sell himself back into slavery. Just as we can, through ongoing sin, throw away the fruits of Jesus sacrifice on the cross.

This redemption is separate from the covering up of our sin by His blood as a perfect sacrifice. Read Leviticus 4, 5, and 6. His shed blood is sufficient to cover us for all time, because He exists outside of time, not just for a short period as in the Levitical offerings. Thus this sacrifice need not be made over and over every year.
Joh 15:4 Abide in me: and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, unless it abide in the vine, so neither can you, unless you abide in me.
**Joh 15:5 I am the vine: you the branches. He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing.
Joh 15:6 If any one abide not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch and shall wither: and they shall gather him up and cast him into the fire: and he burneth. **
Joh 15:7 If you abide in me and my words abide in you, you shall ask whatever you will: and it shall be done unto you.
Joh 15:8 In this is my Father glorified: that you bring forth very much fruit and become my disciples.
Joh 15:9 As the Father hath loved me, I also have loved you. Abide in my love.
**Joh 15:10 If you keep my commandments, you shall abide in my love: **as I also have kept my Father’s commandments and do abide in his love.
What do the above verses have to do with my statements on redemption and blood? We know that not all will be in heaven because by His own words we must abide in Him. If we fail to abide in Him we will be cut off because we have sold ourselves back into slavery.

We will then need to come back to Him on our knees, begging for His forgiveness. And forgive us He will.
 
clmowry said:
8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God;it is not from works, so no one may boast.

Interesting that you would stop your quote at verse 9 and then conclude what you do.

Does your “OSAS Pauline” version of the Bible not have the 10th verse?

Certainly! But there can be no verse 10 without verses 8 & 9. Those in verse 10 who are “created in Christ Jesus” are those who have been gifted salvation BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH, “not as a result of works.” Verse 10 does not contradict the former by stating that one is “created in Christ Jesus” BY good works. No, my friend, those saved by grace through faith in verses 8 & 9 are, by the grace of God, now "created in Christ Jesus FOR good works, not saved BY them.
It sure looks to me like Paul would say that living in good works is a “requirement” for a believer.
In Eph. 2 verses 8-10 he is saying that those who have been gifted salvation “by grace through faith” are now (and forever) “created in Christ Jesus for the good works” (cf. verses 5-7) prepared by God beforehand, that they (the saved, no longer “in Adam” but now “created in Christ Jesus”) should walk in them.

IOW, verses 8 & 9 are not contingent on verse 10. But verse 10 is contingent on 8 & 9.
 
40.png
fhansen:
The nature of grace is not well understood. In Catholic theology there exists an inherent link between love and grace, such that the two go hand in hand and may even be the same.
In God there is an “inherent link” between the two. It was His love (not ours) that He sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins (1 Jn. 4:10) that we might believe and be saved by His grace. Though the two are intimately linked in God, they’re not the same.
 
40.png
CentralFLJames:
Oh MD - come on guy are you going go back to playing rope-a-dope again and revert to literalism? If you do that I am going to use literalism to hog-tie your private take on Pauline Theology and prove to you the absurdity that nothing Paul or any of the apostles or saints said is a shred of truth and the bible is invalid just to prove how ludicrous literalism is. Doubt that? If so better re-read Romans 3:10-17 with your fundamentalist-literalist lens:

As it is written:
“There is no one righteous, not even one;
11there is no one who understands,
no one who seeks God.
12All have turned away,
they have together become worthless;
there is no one who does good,
not even one.”[c]
13"Their throats are open graves;
their tongues practice deceit."[d]
“The poison of vipers is on their lips.”[e]
14"Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness."[f]
15"Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16ruin and misery mark their ways,
17and the way of peace they do not know."[g]
18"There is no fear of God before their eyes."

Paul does not exempt even himself here - so do we take Paul at his word and assume he is being truthful in telling us he and all men are deceivers? Seems pretty insanely contradictory yes?
NO. Paul, literally, does not exempt himself from the above description. That is, in his natural state “in Adam.” In their natural state in Adam, he, Peter, John, Mary, Joseph, or any of the Apostles (all Jews) are no better than any run-of-the-mill Gentile. God has charged (declared) that both Jews and Greeks (Gentiles) are ALL UNDER SIN (Rom. 3:9).

This was vividly demonstrated through the Law, because “through the Law comes the knowledge of sin” (Rom. 3:20). Through the covenant of Law (especially the Decalogue) sins were now manifested as definite transgressions against divine Commandments. Through Israel and the Law all men could see that such things as lying, stealing, murder and coveting were utterly sinful in the sight of God. Thereby ALL men (Jews and Gentiles) were guilty of them (Paul’s argument in chapter 1 & 2).

What Paul describes in Rom. 3:10-18 is not a hyperbole, but a literal, divine description of Adam’s fallen race.

But unlike you, Paul doesn’t stop with verses 10-18, but goes on to present the good news (gospel) message of God’s deliverance from our condemned state through Jesus Christ:Rom 3:19-24 “Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God; because by the works of law (i.e., do, and I will do) no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through law {comes} the knowledge (epignosis) of sin (via Commandments, i.e., the Decalogue). But now apart from law {the} righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even {the} righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; for all sinned (in Adam) and (continually) fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift by His grace (how?) through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus” (the cross);
Literalism and fundamentalism are for those who do not have a true apostolic teaching and think they can roll their own do-it-yourself salvation by reading a book and believing anything they want to.
No, unlike the school of Origen, we don’t allegorize the Scriptures to form a “gospel” to our own liking, to our own exaltation. But we accept what God has literally revealed, and seeing our sin and guilt before God, we heed the literal words of Paul and the other Apostles and “repent” (turn direction), being no longer unbelieving but believing in what God has revealed in His written Word concerning salvation through the cross of Christ, and with GREAT JOY praise Him for His gift of justification (righteousness)“through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 3:24).
 
moondweller;4351780Baptism in and of itself carries no power. But tragically said:
Really? No power at all, huh?

Well, we’ve heard what moondweller has to say…now let’s see what God says in His Word.

The Sacrament of Baptism

Many people believe that baptism is merely a symbolic act that one performs before the community of believers as an outward sign of an inward decision to accept Christ as one’s “personal Lord and Savior”. Is this view biblical or does God view baptism differently? Let’s see what the Bible has to say.

Baptism is Related to Impartation of the Holy Spirit

Ezekiel 36:25-27
25 I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean; I will cleanse you from all your impurities and from all your idols. 26 I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. 27 And I will put my Spirit in you and move you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws.

In this Old Testament passage, the prophet clearly speaks of the sacrament of baptism that was to come. Notice the elements: water is sprinkled, the person is actually made clean (not merely imputed to be or called clean), and they receive a new spirit along with the gift of the Holy Spirit. Ezekiel makes a connection between washing in Water and the receipt of the Spirit of God.

However, sometimes when the Old Testament is referenced, people will say, “Well, we follow the New Testament.” in an attempt to dismiss an Old Testament passage. They need to remember the following words from the New Testament:

2 Timothy 3:16-17
16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

Consequently, we can see that all of the Bible must be taken into account when we seek to understand doctrine.

Baptism Washes Away Sin

Acts 2:38-39
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”

At Pentecost, Peter told the crowd to “be baptized…for the forgiveness of…sins.” After that, “you will receive…the Holy Spirit”. Once again, we see the elements of Water and Spirit…just as Ezekiel prophesied. Note too, that this promise is for “you and your children” – a clear endorsement of infant baptism.

Acts 22:16
16 And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name. (Acts 22:16)

Baptism Makes Us Part of the Body of Christ

1 Corinthians 12:13
13 For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.

Galatians 3:26-27
26 You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.

Colossians 2:11-12
11 In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature, not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, 12 having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead.

Baptism Saves

Romans 6:3-4
Or don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.

1 Peter 3:18-22
18 For Christ died for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive by the Spirit, 19 through whom also he went and preached to the spirits in prison 20 who disobeyed long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built. In it only a few people, eight in all, were saved through water, 21 and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at God’s right hand—with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him.

(cont.)
 
Baptism Commanded by Jesus

John 3:5
5 Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.”

Some argue that in this verse, “born of water” refers to the placenta fluid of physical birth. However, there is no scriptural basis for this interpretation. Instead, as the references from Ezekiel and the New Testament passages make clear, the “water” connected with the Holy Spirit is the water of the sacrament of baptism – not that of physical birth. Jesus’ words, understood properly, tell us that unless one is “born of baptism and the Spirit” he cannot enter the kingdom of God. This point is underscored by the fact that Jesus and the disciples went out to baptize

Matthew 28:19
19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

In this passage containing the very last instructions Jesus gave His disciples, we see how important baptism was to Him. He did not say, “Go and make disciples of all nations, teaching them to accept me as their personal Lord and Savior and baptizing them as an outward symbol of this inward acceptance…”

From these passages, we can see that water baptism is connected very closely with the receipt of the Holy Spirit, that baptism washes away sin, that baptism saves us, and that baptism is commanded by Jesus. Therefore, baptism can hardly be viewed as a merely symbolic.

Hope this helps. :tiphat:
 
In this passage containing the very last instructions Jesus gave His disciples, we see how important baptism was to Him. He did not say, “Go and make disciples of all nations, teaching them to accept me as their personal Lord and Savior and baptizing them as an outward symbol of this inward acceptance…”
I think the idea that baptism is merely a symbol is just as weak as the position that communion is merely a symbol. If it’s just a symbol, why do it at all?
 
Originally Posted by guanophore
The problem remains, moon. You are bringing accusations against Roman Catholicism which have no merit unless you can show that all the Apostolic Churches, each of whom received the same instruction from the Apostles, can meet the criteria you have brought. This cannot be done, which makes your accusations without merit. All Churches that have retained the Apostolic succession have infant baptism in the same form and matter used in the first century. Your refusal to investigate the apostolic succession does not nullify it
This is true and this is what the early Church taught and notice how they learned that teaching:
Origen
“The Church received from the apostles the tradition of giving baptism even to infants. The apostles, to whom were committed the secrets of divine mysteries [sacraments], knew there is in everyone innate strains of [original] sin, which must be washed away through water and the Spirit” (Commentaries on Romans 5:9 [A.D. 244]).
What!!! Is Origen missing something here? Did he not read his KJV, or the NIV, or the RSV? Why does he say “The apostles to whom were committed the secrets …”. Where did the apostles get this crazy idea? Who gave those darn apostles the secrets? Could it have been Jesus, or did they too misinterpret the KJV?
Augustine
“What the universal Church holds, not as instituted [invented] by councils but as something always held, is most correctly believed to have been handed down by apostolic authority. Since others respond for children, so that the celebration of the sacrament may be complete for them, it is certainly availing to them for their consecration, because they themselves are not able to respond” (On Baptism 4:24:31 [A.D. 400]).
I guess Augustine was not properly educated. He didn’t have his KJV, to read and have the Holy Spirit educate him properly. Tsk Tsk.
As a Christian I don’t pray for forgiveness,
  • I thank God for Jesus Christ, and that through Him I have* forgiveness of sins; that I have eternal life; and I will not come into judgment but I have passed out of death (in Adam) into life (in Christ), according to the Word of God.
Wow - talk about inventing a new gospel and new interpretation. If we don’t need to ask for forgivness why does Jesus tell us in Matthew to “Repent for the Kingdom of heaven is near.
And what is repentenance? Turning away from our wrong, admitting we have done something wrong, asking for forgiveness, with the intention of not sinning again.

According to MD, we should confess our sins to one another, but forget about God. No need to ask him to forgive us. It’s already a done deal.
If there is no need to ask God for forgiveness, why then does Jesus say that all the sins and blasphemes will be forgiven but a blaspheme (sin)against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. Should we question Jesus why he says that since ALL of our sins are already forgiven? Or is simply believeing enough?

How about the prodigal son? Jesus was showing us **what **we must do. The son asked forgiveness from his father and God.

Why does Jesus say that all the angels in heaven will rejoice over one **repentant **(there is that word again) sinner? (Luke 15-10)
Wait!! maybe Luke misunderstood - He probably meant to say “one believer” rather than repentant.

What about Jesus comparing the kingdom of heaven in Matt 23-35. In part it says “….wicket servant? I forgave thee all the debt because thou didst **entreat **(as in ask; beseech, implore, etc) me…”

And what is repentance but turning away from our wrong, being sorry, asking for forgiveness with a firm resolve not to sin again.

The demons all believe too, are they forgiven?
 
In respect to those which Christ “bore in His body on the cross” (1 Pet. 2:24) there are no “new sins.” In that respect, if there was such a thing as “new sins,” then Christ died needlessly. And at best He would have to lay aside His resurrected, glorified body, return to the womb of another woman, be born and be crucified all over again and again and again and again and again and again and again - I think you get the point: BUT, says the writer of Hebrews via the Holy Spirit: Heb 9:26 "Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself."You present the unbiblical idea of an “initial” forgiveness similar to CentralFLJames’ unbiblical “initial” salvation connected to his new age restoration “gospel.”
No, I am sorry my friend, but it is you that is teaching an unbiblical view on salvation, not only unbiblical but not taught in Christianity for the first 1,500 years of its existence.

But back to the point, then why does St. Paul constantly warn the Christians of the church of Rome not to fall back into sin. He tells them that sin leads to death, and living in the spirit leads to life.
If there is not condemnation, then that warning would be meaningless, and a waste of parchment paper.

What death is Paul warning them about if they do fall back into sin?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top