How can I best explain the Church's stance on contraception to a non-Catholic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Felicity_in_TX
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Felicity_in_TX

Guest
My boyfriend isn’t Catholic and doesn’t see anything wrong with contraception. We are working through some issues right now, but we’ve also been seriously discussing marriage. We seem to have reached an understanding about what my expectations would be for the faith formation of any future children we may have, but one thing we’re (well, HE) kind of stumped on is the Church’s stance on birth control (I have to say, it isn’t just him. Since I converted, MANY of my protestant friends and family have asked me about this).

As a new Catholic, I’ll admit that before I converted I thought that there was nothing wrong with the use of contraception inside marriage. However, after talking with other Catholics and Priests and reading Theology of the Body I’ve come to believe that the use of contraception is a sin. I’ve tried explaining the reasoning behind this to my boyfriend, but have found it very difficult for me to articulate. Obviously, this is something that needs to be settled before we get married. He’s not adamantly opposed to the idea of NFP, he just wants to understand why the Church insists on it. I know that if I could explain it better, he would probably come around.

I’m asking this here because based on threads that I’ve read, I see that there are many people here who faithfully practice NFP and I figure someone has to be able to articulate WHY the Church teaches this better than I’ve been able to. Or maybe some one can point me towards some literature that might be helpful? Thanks in advance! 🙂
 
This was the article that made the most sense to me when I started trying to explain the question to other people. It’s a little long, but it’s a great “personalist” explanation of what’s wrong with contraception. If you can get your bf to read it, it may at least give you more common ground for discussion…

I’ve also heard terrific things about Janet Smith’s “Contraception: Why Not?” talk (or video???) I’m sure a quick Google will bring up some links…

Best of luck,

Margaret
 
Contraceptions make sex unnatural. Scientifically speaking, sex is reproduction.

Contraceptions make people irresponsible. Why worry about the consequences of adultery and fornication? You can have all the sex you want! Ironically, it is out of fear of the natural consequence of sex (pregnancy) that contraceptions are used.

Contraceptions encourage adultery and fornication. It is when understanding of the evil of adultery and of fornication is lost, when people only care for carnal pleasure and do not understand the nature of sex, that contraceptions encourages adultery and fornication.

Contraceptions devalue people as private property. The person that could be loved as a spouse is instead used as a tool for carnal pleasure.
 
This is what I tell people when they ask me:

We view the Father-Mother-Child as a reflection of the Father-Son-Holy Spirit. The Father and Son gave each other Their TOTAL self, without holding anything back, and the true Person produced by that love is the Holy Spirit. Using contraception in the marital act is almost blasphemous - it disrupts the design of sex, to mirror the Blessed Trinity’s acts of love.

Not a perfect definition, but one that makes sense to a lot of nonCatholics.

Or, if I have a computer handy, I show them some of these youtube videos, which are funny and informative! (I sound like such an infomercial)

youtube.com/watch?v=v56Z1DIMI58
youtube.com/watch?v=ti9ZBGRf9qc&feature=channel_page
youtube.com/watch?v=G0UomDP6ExM&feature=channel_page
youtube.com/watch?v=aqtx0IX8X7Q&feature=channel_page

My favorite is the last one, and there are lots more videos. Just click on their username ‘eskyguard’.
 
catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/se0002.html

usccb.org/prolife/issues/nfp/cathteach.shtml

Christopher West has a lot of resources to help explain the relationship between spouses and the relationship between Christ and his church which that relationship reflects as well as the reflection between marriage and the Trinity.

abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Sex/story?id=7527380&page=1

christopherwest.com/default.asp

catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/se0109.html

He book Good News About Sex and Marriage is very good.

Also Greg Popcak’s book Holy Sex is good.

Love and Responsibility by Karol Wojtyla(Pope John Paul 2) is excellent also.
 
Several years before we became Catholic, we somehow (not sure how we heard of it) listened to one of Dr. Janet Smith’s tapes (I think it was the tape that an earlier poster mentioned).

She convinced us. We weren’t even aware while listening to her that this was a “Catholic” thing. We just thought she made a lot of sense from a physiological and moral point of view.

In case you’re wondering what we did about it, sadly, my husband had already had a vasectomy years earlier.

So we grieved. That was how we reacted to her tape. We’re still grieving.

Thinking about it, I think we may have heard this tape in a Protestant Sunday School class or discussion group of some kind. About ten years ago, a movement went through evangelical Protestantism (and is still happening) that encouraged Christians to have many children and to honor the wife’s fertility). Several families in our church, including the pastors (Senior pastor and associate pastor) and the head elder had large families with 8 or more children, and many other families had four or more children, and were open to having more. We started hearing more sermons about being “open to life.” So that may have been where we first heard Dr. Smith.

Perhaps your fiance should know that–this is not a “Catholic” thing. Many Protestants are becoming convinced that husbands and wives should be open to having as many children as God will give them.
 
Thanks, y’all! I’m going to look up all the resources you shared.

Cat, your insight was very helpful. This kinda made me chuckle though:
Perhaps your fiance should know that–this is not a “Catholic” thing. Many Protestants are becoming convinced that husbands and wives should be open to having as many children as God will give them.
His parents are strict “Independent” (which to me just seems like “fundamentalist”) Baptists. His own mother told him not too long ago, “if you’re having sex with that girl (she refuses to call me by my name), you better be using a condom. You can’t trust a Catholic to take birth control pills.” :rolleyes: I’m not sure if that’s reflective of their denomination’s attitude towards contraception, or just his mother’s passive agressive attitude towards me.

In any case, he’s been going to Mass with me regularly, but hasn’t attended a protestant service in over a year. I recently offered to start going to church with him once a week (in addition to, not in place of, Mass). Maybe I’ll do some research and see if there are any Baptist churches around here that share the Catholic Church’s view on this. That may help him to see it as a Christianity “thing” rather than exclusively Catholic.
 
Felicity, I was struggling with another issue, the CC’s ban on IVF, when I heard a simple statement by Pope B16, and suddenly everything clicked - it explains everything from fornication and homosexual acts to contraception and IVF. The statement: The sexual act in marriage is the outward (visible) sign of a mystery which is deeper and invisible. In other words, there’s more to sex than meets the eye.

When a ship approaches an iceberg, the captain must be aware that the larger part of the iceberg is immersed under water and not visible - there’s more to an iceberg than it meets the eye.

The CC is replete with such mysteries which mean more than their outward appearance, and if your bf would be Catholic, I would only give the example of the Sacraments of the New Testament. But since non-Catholic religions do not believe in some of our Sacraments, I will also give examples from the OT.

Consider the following:

-the parents bring a newborn to the church, he is sprinkled with water, and everybody makes a big deal about it and celebrates. How ridiculous is that to someone who doesn’t know or doesn’t believe that there’s more to Baptism than it meets the eye? However, Christians (both Catholics and non-Catholics) know and believe that when the baby is sprinkled, God washes away the effects of the original sin and puts an indelible sign on the soul, a sign that sets us apart from non-baptized persons and stays on our souls as a sign of eternal victory (in Heaven) or eternal shame (in Hell).

-people line up with great reverence, receive and eat a piece of wafer, sometimes also take a sip of wine. What was the reaction to this of an atheist college professor, who desecrated the Eucharist and posted a video on youtube? Something like, c’mon, stupid Catholics, it’s just a piece of wafer! But we know and believe that the Eucharist is truly the body and blood, soul and divinity of Christ (Protestants do not believe this).

-the Bishop puts some oil on the foreheads of people, and again Catholics make a big deal out of it and a celebration. Ridiculous (for an atheist). But we know and believe that the Holy Spirit descends on us during Confirmation.

-in the OT, Moses made a serpent of brass, elevated it, and people bitten by snakes survived when they looked at it. There was more to this serpent than a piece of metal, more than it met the eye.

-a certain man from Galilee was crucified and died on a cross. This is nonsense to atheists, but Christians know and believe that Christ mysteriously paid the price for our sins and earned eternal life for his followers.

How about sex? The world will tell you that it’s just a recreational activity, similar to playing tennis or having dinner. Hence, it’s OK for non-married people to do it, for two men or two women to do it with each other, to contracept and avoid pregnancy, or to create babies in a Petri dish through IVF and thus leave out sex from the procreative act altogether.

However, the CC teaches that there is more to sex than it meets the eye, it is the outward appearance of a deeper mystery, the mystery of oneness (unity) and total self-giving of a married couple (man and woman). This unity and self-giving brings forth the fruit of children, procreation as an act of participation in God’s creation. Thus, when we are dealing with sex, there’s more to it than it meets the eye, and we better play by the rules established by God, rules that the CC is fortunately aware of and teaches us through the grace of the Holy Spirit. The CC teaches that dissociating the unitive act from the procreative act is a sin. Contraception prevents procreation; IVF is procreation without the unitive act.

Just as the wise captain of a ship will not ignore the invisible part of the iceberg, since that larger and invisible part which is under water could destroy and sink the ship, the wise spouse will not ignore the rules for proper use of sexuality in marriage, and contraception definitely has the potential to destroy and sink marriages. The more contraception, the more divorces and messed-up marriages. And sorry, this is not something that Pope Paul 6 invented in 1968 to forbid the use of the Pill and make our lives difficult, this has been the constant teaching of the CC for 2000 years and it was the understanding of the Jewish people in OT times (other forms of contraception were available way before the Pill). When the Episcopal Church decided in 1930 that contraception was OK, and other Protestant denominations and even the Eastern Orthodox Churches followed suit, that was a mistake and a departure from a constant teaching and tradition of 2000 years. When we misunderstand the proper role and rules for sex, other mistakes follow, see ordination of active gay Bishops in the Episcopal Church.

The fact that contraception is wrong (gravely disordered, a grave sin), also sheds more light on why abortion is wrong. There’s more to abortion than killing a human being. While contraception prevents, abortion destroys the fruit of unity and self-giving of a married couple. Even in the time of St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th c. it was still disputed whether the soul enters the human body immediately at the moment of conception, or perhaps only later such as 40 days after conception. However this dispute was never used to justify abortion in the early phases (first 40 days) of pregnancy, abortion was always and universally condemned, based on the understanding that it destroys the God-given fruits of marriage and it defeats the God-ordained natural purpose of marriage. Contraception rather than destroying, prevents the fruits, and defeats the natural purpose of marriage.

Someone on these forums has the signature: “Faith makes things possible, not easy.” Living a marriage in accord with God’s plan and avoiding contraception is not easy, but it’s possible with faith and will be rewarded by God with much peace and happiness.
 
Felicity, another mystery that every Christian understands: we are more than physical bodies made up of water, proteins and other biochemical components. We also have invisible souls. Similarly, the marital act is a mystery beyond what’s described by medicine and physiology. As such, the invisible part (mystery) was designed by God and intended to be used in certain ways and for certain purposes, and only the Catholic Church understands and teaches this correctly, because only the CC is infallible. The Protestant and Eastern Orthodox Churches have fallen into errors, unfortunately, including the teaching that contraception is OK. However, all major Protestant denominations and EO Churches taught before 1930 that contraception was sinful. As I said, the Episcopal Church changed its stance at the Lambeth Conference of 1930, and during the 20th c. a lot of Protestant and EO Churches followed suit. However up to and including the 19th century, all Christian Churches and denominations forbade contraception, Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants alike.
 
Sorry for the triple post, but I wanted to add this: we Catholics must place a greater emphasis on being obedient to the teachings of our Church, than on understanding “why”. Obedience can save lives, consider the case of a small child who never understood why it was forbidden for him to play with knives, fire, and electricity. Quite possibly his obedience to his parents was instrumental in avoiding an accident that could have maimed or killed him. Putting it this way to non-Catholics is quite provocative, I know, because it implies this: my Church is correct, my Church is infallible, and therefore worth obeying its teachings, while yours is not. Felicity, you may not want to begin your conversation with your bf like this 😛 and shock him immediately so severely, but be prepared that eventually you two will have to talk about this.

God luck to you, you are indeed a very special couple (I’ve read your other thread) and I’ve been praying for you! I have a great, great respect for members of our military, police, and firefighters!
 
Joseph,

Thank you for sharing all that with me! You’ve given me a great deal to think about and to share with my boyfriend. This has been an ongoing conversation between ever since we began seriously discussing marriage. It’s frustrating for me to not be able to articulate the reasons behind it because I know that’s what he needs to hear. For me, it’s easier to accept that it’s right because the Church says that it is, but he doesn’t share that faith.

Thank you also for your prayers. Things have improved a great deal over the past week. He told me yesterday that he’s been sleeping better, and that alone has made a world of difference in his stress level. He also mentioned that he’s considering seeing a doctor about the sleep issues. I’d prefer that he’d see a counselor, but perhaps a doctor can talk him into that. It’s a step in the right direction…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top