T
Tennis77
Guest
I am having trouble convincing a friend that predestination - God choosing some people that get to go to heaven (before they are even born) and basically sending the rest to hell - is not how salvation works. Basically they say that how you act and behave on earth has no influence on whether you are saved or not.
I guess that there may be two ways to disprove this idea of (I think the correct term is actually double predestination). One would be to explain salvation, and another would be to prove that double predestination is Biblically incorrect. Unfortunately, I don’t know many verses in Scripture that we use to explain salvation. If you could provide some and maybe even clarify how salvation works I would be very grateful. I’m not sure if you have ever encountered someone who believed in double predestination before and know how to explain that it is incorrect?
When I try to say that it is wrong, one of the arguments I receive is that everyone is a sinner and deserves to go to hell and it seems like they think that God doesn’t want us to be in heaven with Him, at least that’s how it comes across to me. What I cannot grasp about that viewpoint is why some people are randomly chosen for no reason over others, and why God would send people, who may very well be firm, devout believers, to hell. When I try to use Matthew 25:31-46 as an example of earthly actions affecting one’s salvation, they say that those people were already saved beforehand. But what about people who choose to do those things Jesus commanded that aren’t predestined to heaven? Everyone has the free will to choose to follow Christ, so why would only some people, for no reason, be chosen to go to heaven while others simply go to hell?
It almost seems that double predestination is a way to get rid of accountability for actions. If you can sin all you want and break all 10 commandments each day and never give it a second thought yet still be chose to be saved, then there is absolutely no incentive to do good, to follow God’s commandments.
I appreciate your time in helping me
I guess that there may be two ways to disprove this idea of (I think the correct term is actually double predestination). One would be to explain salvation, and another would be to prove that double predestination is Biblically incorrect. Unfortunately, I don’t know many verses in Scripture that we use to explain salvation. If you could provide some and maybe even clarify how salvation works I would be very grateful. I’m not sure if you have ever encountered someone who believed in double predestination before and know how to explain that it is incorrect?
When I try to say that it is wrong, one of the arguments I receive is that everyone is a sinner and deserves to go to hell and it seems like they think that God doesn’t want us to be in heaven with Him, at least that’s how it comes across to me. What I cannot grasp about that viewpoint is why some people are randomly chosen for no reason over others, and why God would send people, who may very well be firm, devout believers, to hell. When I try to use Matthew 25:31-46 as an example of earthly actions affecting one’s salvation, they say that those people were already saved beforehand. But what about people who choose to do those things Jesus commanded that aren’t predestined to heaven? Everyone has the free will to choose to follow Christ, so why would only some people, for no reason, be chosen to go to heaven while others simply go to hell?
It almost seems that double predestination is a way to get rid of accountability for actions. If you can sin all you want and break all 10 commandments each day and never give it a second thought yet still be chose to be saved, then there is absolutely no incentive to do good, to follow God’s commandments.
I appreciate your time in helping me