Y
youngsaint
Guest
I would like to attend a Latin Mass, and so, I’m sure, would a majority of catholics in my very-conservative-city, but there is no Traditional mass near my location. Does anyone have experience with this?
Hi, there!I would like to attend a Latin Mass, and so, I’m sure, would a majority of catholics in my very-conservative-city, but there is no Traditional mass near my location. Does anyone have experience with this?
The proper ‘protocol’, as I understand it, is that you are to first approach your parish priest. If he is unable or unwilling to assist, or simply unresponsive, then you are to approach your local bishop. If the bishop is unable or unwilling to assist, or unresponsive, then write to the PCED in Rome.I would like to attend a Latin Mass, and so, I’m sure, would a majority of catholics in my very-conservative-city, but there is no Traditional mass near my location. Does anyone have experience with this?
This is the Traditional Catholicism Forum. The NO in Latin is not Traditional. Not to mention, the OP specified the ‘Traditional’ Mass in his/her post. The NO in Latin is not the Traditional Mass. It is also a rarity, in the states at least. In addition, Summorum Pontificum granted the faithful a way to obtain the Traditional Latin Mass, not the NO in Latin.By “Latin Mass,” which form do you mean?
The Ordinary Form may be celebrated in Latin, too. In fact, Pope Benedict does this all the time.
This is why The Pope and the Vatican should mandat that both forms must be taught in the Semanaries and have Bishops require the Diocesican Priests learn the EF Mass! Also Latin must be taught in Catholic Schools.Usually the biggest obstacle in having the traditional Mass (Extraordinary Form) in your parish is finding a priest who is able to offer it. Most priests do not know how – they don’t have the Latin language skills and don’t know the rubrics. Additionally, it’s difficult to add another Mass to the Sunday schedule if there are not enough priests.
Una Voce America sponsors a Priest Training Program. If you know of a priest who is willing to offer the Mass but needs training, Una Voce will cover costs of the program. You can email them here also.
So following the disciplines of the Church may not be Traditional?This is the Traditional Catholicism Forum. The NO in Latin is not Traditional. Not to mention, the OP specified the ‘Traditional’ Mass in his/her post. The NO in Latin is not the Traditional Mass. It is also a rarity, in the states at least. In addition, Summorum Pontificum granted the faithful a way to obtain the Traditional Latin Mass, not the NO in Latin.
As I posted in the Liturgy and Sacraments sub-forum. The Masters of Divinity 4 year professional Masters degree program is 102 credit hours in length.This is why The Pope and the Vatican should mandat that both forms must be taught in the Semanaries and have Bishops require the Diocesican Priests learn the EF Mass! Also Latin must be taught in Catholic Schools.
This will address the problem of 1. learning and understanding the Latin Language and 2. finding a Priest to say the EF Mass. 3. The Priest will be offer both forms then there will not be a problem if a group of people ask for a EF Mass.
ByzCath - The entire CA forum, with the exception of the Traditional Catholicism section, is basically all about the OF, as it is called today. The Traditional Catholicism forum was started for discussions on the EF, the SSPX and topics which are considered Traditional Catholicism. That would not be the OF. The OP goes to the OF. The OP specifically said they were looking to start a Latin Mass (later the OP referenced a Traditional Mass). The OP is obviously not talking about the OF.So following the disciplines of the Church may not be Traditional?
Traditional Catholicism is not the EF Mass only.
Here is what Summorum Pontificum says:I know some people have read into Summorum Pontificum that the people have a right to the EF Mass and that a priest must celebrate it for them when requested but that is not what the document says.
Pope Benedict has already requested that seminarians learn sufficent Latin to be able to say the MassAs I posted in the Liturgy and Sacraments sub-forum. The Masters of Divinity 4 year professional Masters degree program is 102 credit hours in length.
May I ask wht you suggest be dropped from the program to do this?.
Speaking more generally, I ask that future priests, from their time in the seminary, receive the preparation needed to understand and to celebrate Mass in Latin, and also to use Latin texts and execute Gregorian chant;
From forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=6115468&postcount=2 in the stickies up top:Thank you, NeelyAnn for saying what has been bothering me for sometime now. The eastern rites have a forum and the OF rite has a forum as does the TLM folks. (thats this forum) Why do others keep bouncing in here and raising a “little cain”.
Wish a moderatoer would clarify this issue.
Yes and I see nothing wrong with that, at worst that is adding a one or two semester course. But you added the stipulation that all seminarians be able to celebrate both forms of the Mass.Pope Benedict has already requested that seminarians learn sufficent Latin to be able to say the Mass
Wow, 123 credit hours, I guess I will stop complaining about the 102 credit hours. But I bet if we look at the work we will see the 102 I am required to take is close to the 123 there because for some reason my theologate likes to throw in a bunch of 2 credit classes (something that most seminaries/theologates do not do). I do not understand why becuase as it is, the 2 credit courses seem to have more work involved than the 3 credit courses, just less class room time.Our own seminary ( Sacred Heart Major Seminary) already requires the seminarians to take a year of Latin AND instructs the seminarians on how to say the OF Mass in Latin.
One of the former seminarians from our parish (now a priest) spent two weeks just after his ordination with the priests of St. John Cantus learning the rubrics for the EF Mass. That was with the Latin he learned right out of the seminary.
Here is the requisite undergrad program ( B.A. in Philosophy)
aodonline.org/SHMS/Academic+Programs+13375/Udergraduate+Degree+Programs+14754/Bachelor+of+Philosophy+5991/Bachelor+of+Philosophy±+B.Phil+Program.htm
And the M.Div ( 123 credit hours)
aodonline.org/SHMS/Academic+Programs+13375/Graduate+Degree+Programs+14756/Master+of+Divinity+5977/Master+of+Divinity±+Course+of+Study.htm
I think you are mistaken, at least as far as this forum is concerned. “Traditional” has never been defined. The T in TLM is for Tridentine, not Traditional. There is at least one poster here that is an old hand that attends the current Mass in Latin. He is a traditional as anyone here.This is the Traditional Catholicism Forum. The NO in Latin is not Traditional.
This is a gross mischaracterization. Apologetics has nothing to do with the form of the Mass, neither does most of the other sub-forums. That it can be discussed there has nothing to do with it anyways.ByzCath - The entire CA forum, with the exception of the Traditional Catholicism section, is basically all about the OF, as it is called today.
Again, wrong again. I know of many parishes that have the OF in Latin and their bulletin lists those as Latin Mass.Like I said, this is the Traditional Catholicism forum. There would be no need to ask about starting an OF Mass (NO Mass). Those are readily available everywhere. Not to mention that the OF is not referred to as the Latin Mass or the Traditional Mass. Only the EF Mass is referred to in those ways.
Then if we follow this explicitly we should not be discussing Summorum Pontificum in this thread as that is a practice of the Church today.From forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=6115468&postcount=2 in the stickies up top:
This is the Traditional Catholicism forum. It is intended for the discussion of traditional Catholicism not the practices of the Church today. It is intended for traditional Catholics.
Non-traditional Catholics, Catholics of other rites, and non-Catholics are welcome to participate in the TC forum, however, they will not be allowed to dominate conversations or to push agendas which are not in keeping with the purpose of this forum.
I remember that sticky and did not see it this way. Since, as is often pointed out, the TLM is not an indult Mass, it is a practice of the Church today. I believe the simpler answer is that this comments was in response to the post on such things as CITH, girl altar servers, EMHC, etc., that have nothing to do with Traditional Catholicism. There was one particular thread about the “Novus Ordo” being forty years old. I think this is the type of thing that was aimed at and not intended as a ban on discussion of the Latin Mass in the current order.This is the Traditional Catholicism forum. It is intended for the discussion of traditional Catholicism not the practices of the Church today. It is intended for traditional Catholics.