S
SpeakKindly
Guest
From my understand, when we’re in Heaven/Hell, we’re not able to get out. So, how is it possible for Mary to appear on Earth to people during apparitions?
Boom.Only the lost souls in hell are bound there. Those in heaven are free to come and go as God directs them. For example, Moses and Elijah met Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration. If they couldn’t get out of heaven how did they appear there?![]()
Yep! Plus Mary has a glorified body and thus also has the benefit of being able to appear physically too.Only the lost souls in hell are bound there. Those in heaven are free to come and go as God directs them. For example, Moses and Elijah met Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration. If they couldn’t get out of heaven how did they appear there?![]()
Well technically neither Moses or Elijah were in heaven before Christ opened the gates of heaven and descended to hell and brought the righteous to heaven, but your point remains the same.Only the lost souls in hell are bound there. Those in heaven are free to come and go as God directs them. For example, Moses and Elijah met Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration. If they couldn’t get out of heaven how did they appear there?![]()
Do you believe that heaven and hell are separate places far away from earth?From my understand, when we’re in Heaven/Hell, we’re not able to get out. So, how is it possible for Mary to appear on Earth to people during apparitions?
Wasn’t that by Abbott? Not Asimov?I will borrow from Isaac Asimov. Imagine a two-dimensional world. Let’s call it Flatland.
I have not read anything by Abbott. I remember reading about Flatland in either Asimov on Numbers or (more likely) Asimov on Physics, which were collections of previously published material. A quick Wikipedia search on Abbott reveals that Asimov wrote the introduction to the Fifth Edition of Abbott’s Flatland, and this may have been included in one of Asimov’s collections. Or maybe Asimov expanded on the concept with additional “Flatland” analogies. At any rate, my analogy refers to how “Flatland” was explained by Asimov. I don’t know how closely it pertains to Abbott, because Asimov was concerned only with the physical properties of Flatland, whereas Abbott apparently used Flatland as a socio-political satirical metaphor (Lewis Carroll style).Wasn’t that by Abbott? Not Asimov?
Sublime.Mary is not here incarnate, but as an apparition. Thus, she sometimes appears as the nationality of the culture in which she appears. So we are not necessarily seeing her true appearance, as I understand. And by “appearing” she is not “departing” from heaven any more than the angel Gabriel might have been “gone” from heaven when he was at the Annunciation.
Your analogy was sound, make no mistake.I have not read anything by Abbott. I remember reading about Flatland in either Asimov on Numbers or (more likely) Asimov on Physics, which were collections of previously published material. A quick Wikipedia search on Abbott reveals that Asimov wrote the introduction to the Fifth Edition of Abbott’s Flatland, and this may have been included in one of Asimov’s collections. Or maybe Asimov expanded on the concept with additional “Flatland” analogies. At any rate, my analogy refers to how “Flatland” was explained by Asimov. I don’t know how closely it pertains to Abbott, because Asimov was concerned only with the physical properties of Flatland, whereas Abbott apparently used Flatland as a socio-political satirical metaphor (Lewis Carroll style).