Huh? The distinction to be made here that you’re missing is that Meltzerboy said that what I had written is not befitting a Christian. That is not a matter of doctrine or teaching, but of what he personally feels it’s right for a Christian to say or do. He may indeed have many ideas of what that consists of or does not consist of, but since he is not a Christian himself, those don’t matter outside of his personal opinion (which again, he’s entitled to, but he’s playing outside of his own field at that point). By means of analogy, I may have many ideas of how Muslims should behave toward Christians, but I wouldn’t expect them to abide by my idea of the Muslim moral code over and above their own, should they conflict. After all, they know the sources of their own code better than I could.
And again, the fact is there is precedent for denouncing the false beliefs of others (including universalism, what I’ve taken issue with in Matthew Light’s posts). Indeed, we praise St. Athanasius the Apostolic as the pillar of faith that he was (y’know, Athanasius contra mundum and all that) precisely because he stood up to popular ideas that were wrong. I would never in a million years compare myself or my posting to anything he did (Lord have mercy!), either in character or in importance, but the fact remains that what he did against the false beliefs in his day did not make him less Christian as a result. Heck, we likewise remember St. Nicholas, Wonderworker and bishop of Myra in modern Turkey, and he punched Arius the heretic in the face!
So, y’know…it could be a lot worse.