How can non-Catholics can ok with Catholics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter inomcoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Della, it was a purely hypothetical scenario, from post #56- "it’s not true, but let’s pretend it is)- My point was we must be careful with intent, motive or conflict in interests with development of doctrine/practice. I was going to give Henry the 8th as an example, which might fit what I am trying to say but is much more complicated.
Do forgive any nitpicking on my part. 🙂 I do understand what you were aiming at, but we have lurkers and seekers who would miss the point entirely and focus solely on your example, which was not your intention. Yes, Henry 8 would be a much better example. May God have mercy on his soul and on all of us. 😉
 
Actually I think the reason Protestants aren’t troubled is because for Protestants Unity happens in Christ, not their organization they belong to. Protestants also see The Church to be made up of those who have enters into New Life with Christ…and Christ can reach anyone that has an open heart. So we see Catholics just one of many flavors
I like the way you’ve written this. A very visionary understanding of what true unity is!

To me, we are all united in the spirit of Christ, I would also include those like Jews, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, even atheists who might not recognize that Jesus of Nazareth is Christ, yet we are still united in our spiritual relationship as children of God.
 
Such cosmic/dematerialized unity is an affront to Christ Himself. As He prayed that we may be one as He and His Father are one, to then say that this unity is somehow everyone together whether they recognize Christ or not is to do damage to the relation of the Father and the Son in a way that should be and is completely unacceptable to any traditional Christian – Catholic or otherwise. No. We are not gnostics, dispensationalists, nor religious universalists, and that a Baha’i would praise such ridiculousness as a “visionary” understanding of unity only showcases the utter confusion and bankruptcy that is Baha’i theology and its cultish, quasi-hippie anti-dogma dogma. Ugh. May God (the one and only true God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) have mercy on the millions deceived by Baha’ism and similar falsehoods.
 
Such cosmic/dematerialized unity is an affront to Christ Himself.
I think your copy of the Bible is missing a lot of pages.

Maybe you can find them online:

Luke:10:25-37

Matthew 7:1-5

Matthew 7:21-23

1 Corinthians 13:1-8
May God (the one and only true God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) have mercy on the millions deceived by Baha’ism and similar falsehoods.
May God have mercy on those who believe His hands are tied up and that He would send a Jew like Anne Frank to burn in everlasting fire because her intellectual beliefs differed from his own, by fault of being born to the wrong parents.

Salvation and spiritual life is our own love for God as born witnessed by our lives, not a special magical club some people belong to.
 
Such cosmic/dematerialized unity is an affront to Christ Himself. As He prayed that we may be one as He and His Father are one, to then say that this unity is somehow everyone together whether they recognize Christ or not is to do damage to the relation of the Father and the Son in a way that should be and is completely unacceptable to any traditional Christian – Catholic or otherwise. No. We are not gnostics, dispensationalists, nor religious universalists, and that a Baha’i would praise such ridiculousness as a “visionary” understanding of unity only showcases the utter confusion and bankruptcy that is Baha’i theology and its cultish, quasi-hippie anti-dogma dogma. Ugh. May God (the one and only true God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) have mercy on the millions deceived by Baha’ism and similar falsehoods.
I usually don’t respond to posts like this, but I must say I find this post uncharitable, not worthy of you or any other Christian.
 
Do forgive any nitpicking on my part. 🙂 I do understand what you were aiming at, but we have lurkers and seekers who would miss the point entirely and focus solely on your example, which was not your intention. Yes, Henry 8 would be a much better example. May God have mercy on his soul and on all of us. 😉
Thank you. Yes, just saw a recent movie about Henry with some beheading. Ugly times but to be careful to wonder how are we ugly today, un-Christ like as a Church/Body ? Blessings
 
I usually don’t respond to posts like this, but I must say I find this post uncharitable, not worthy of you or any other Christian.
As you are Jew, that’s not your determination to make. That all should recognize Christ is the Holy Bible’s idea, not mine. From the Gospel of St. John, chapter 1, verse 12: “But as many as received him, he gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name.”

Nothing in there about how people who do not believe in Christ are somehow to be counted among those who do. Dematerialized theosophizing as advanced here by our resident Baha’is and others is an affront to the Christian faith. Period. It would be quite frankly much more uncharitable to let it stand and give all Christ-deniers succor as though they’re fine just the way they are. You want to preach Baha’ism, I’m sure there are places for that. I wouldn’t think that Catholic Answers forum is such a place, but perhaps I am out of step with its goals once again. 🤷
 
As you are Jew, that’s not your determination to make. That all should recognize Christ is the Holy Bible’s idea, not mine. From the Gospel of St. John, chapter 1, verse 12: “But as many as received him, he gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name.”
I don’t know if you speak for the Coptic, but quoting Bible verses out of context is not the way to convince anyone of anything. As a Catholic I can say that this verse does not condemn anyone for anything and doesn’t speak of who is damned and who isn’t.
Nothing in there about how people who do not believe in Christ are somehow to be counted among those who do. Dematerialized theosophizing as advanced here by our resident Baha’is and others is an affront to the Christian faith. Period. It would be quite frankly much more uncharitable to let it stand and give all Christ-deniers succor as though they’re fine just the way they are. You want to preach Baha’ism, I’m sure there are places for that. I wouldn’t think that Catholic Answers forum is such a place, but perhaps I am out of step with its goals once again. 🤷
I’m surprised to read a Coptic reacting like a Bible-only Fundamentalist. Your comments are not how the Catholic Church views non-Christians. I agree with another poster who wrote that your posts are uncharitable and not in line with CAF’s forum rules.
 
As you are Jew, that’s not your determination to make. That all should recognize Christ is the Holy Bible’s idea, not mine. From the Gospel of St. John, chapter 1, verse 12: “But as many as received him, he gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name.”

Nothing in there about how people who do not believe in Christ are somehow to be counted among those who do. Dematerialized theosophizing as advanced here by our resident Baha’is and others is an affront to the Christian faith. Period. It would be quite frankly much more uncharitable to let it stand and give all Christ-deniers succor as though they’re fine just the way they are. You want to preach Baha’ism, I’m sure there are places for that. I wouldn’t think that Catholic Answers forum is such a place, but perhaps I am out of step with its goals once again. 🤷
Neither is it my place to speak for another person, so I withdraw my response to your comment. However, I would note that Matthew Light spoke of unity in the specific context of the spirit of Christ and no other manifestation of G-d, so I don’t believe he is preaching his own faith.
 
It would be quite frankly much more uncharitable to let it stand and give all Christ-deniers succor as though they’re fine just the way they are. :
Thou art my Lord, Jesus.

Is this the truth from you, God?

That Anne Frank is burning in the fires of hell simply because of her incorrect religious beliefs, and anyone who questions this is “deceived”, a “hippie” and a “Christ-denier”? Is Anne Frank your dearly loved child as I believe in my heart, or the daughter of Satan as dzheremi apparently believes? Which vision is more perfect and more beautiful?

Lord Jesus, I know that “perfect love casteth out fear”. I stand here, unafraid of your answer. I trust you Lord, I love you, I have faith in You, I know You are the Lord of all good and beauty and truth and love.
 
As you are Jew, that’s not your determination to make. That all should recognize Christ is the Holy Bible’s idea, not mine. From the Gospel of St. John, chapter 1, verse 12: “But as many as received him, he gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name.”

Nothing in there about how people who do not believe in Christ are somehow to be counted among those who do. Dematerialized theosophizing as advanced here by our resident Baha’is and others is an affront to the Christian faith. Period. It would be quite frankly much more uncharitable to let it stand and give all Christ-deniers succor as though they’re fine just the way they are. You want to preach Baha’ism, I’m sure there are places for that. I wouldn’t think that Catholic Answers forum is such a place, but perhaps I am out of step with its goals once again. 🤷
I’m a Christian and your comments about the Baha’i faith is uncharitable and out of line with how Christians are supposed to address errors in other faiths and spread the true faith.

As for a Jew, or any other non-Christian, not being able to determine what the faith teaches, that is false. One doesn’t need a special member’s card or secret knowledge to know what the faith teaches. All one needs is the ability to read those theological experts who have been deemed to be orthodox in their teachings and discussions about the faith.
 
Hahaha. You people are a hoot. Only in an environment like this could condemning universalism which is at the heart of Baha’i theosophy (as our fathers did in council against the prevalence of that idea in its own form among certain early Christian writers) be seen as tantamount to condemning others to hell. That is quite frankly ridiculous, and your own readings of my post, nowhere in the text of what I actually posted. My point was and is that it is wrong to include all manner of non-Christians together with Christians as though there is no distinction between one who actually believes in Christ and the Christian religion (i.e., an actual Christian) and one who does not and thinks it to be corrupted in this or that fashion (as Baha’is do). All this stuff about Anne Frank burning or me being a “fundamentalist” is your silly reactions, and answering to them would only give credence to such hysterics, which I won’t do.

If any of you believe in universalism, then feel free to leave the religions you’re very clearly in. Obviously Matthew is a Baha’i for some reason, and Meltzerboy a Jew, and Della a Catholic, and myself Orthodox, and everyone is whatever it is they are. I respect those distinctions, and have no respect for positions that do not. This is not saying that anyone who is not whatever it is I am is doomed or damned or whatever, but obviously I think Orthodox Christianity to be uniquely true in ways that other religions or sects are not, no matter what my neighbor’s belief may be. If that makes me a fundamentalist, then as the Copts would say, neshkor Allah akhadni el-baraka (something like thanks be to God, I take the blessing). 🙂
 
As for a Jew, or any other non-Christian, not being able to determine what the faith teaches, that is false.
Huh? The distinction to be made here that you’re missing is that Meltzerboy said that what I had written is not befitting a Christian. That is not a matter of doctrine or teaching, but of what he personally feels it’s right for a Christian to say or do. He may indeed have many ideas of what that consists of or does not consist of, but since he is not a Christian himself, those don’t matter outside of his personal opinion (which again, he’s entitled to, but he’s playing outside of his own field at that point). By means of analogy, I may have many ideas of how Muslims should behave toward Christians, but I wouldn’t expect them to abide by my idea of the Muslim moral code over and above their own, should they conflict. After all, they know the sources of their own code better than I could.

And again, the fact is there is precedent for denouncing the false beliefs of others (including universalism, what I’ve taken issue with in Matthew Light’s posts). Indeed, we praise St. Athanasius the Apostolic as the pillar of faith that he was (y’know, Athanasius contra mundum and all that) precisely because he stood up to popular ideas that were wrong. I would never in a million years compare myself or my posting to anything he did (Lord have mercy!), either in character or in importance, but the fact remains that what he did against the false beliefs in his day did not make him less Christian as a result. Heck, we likewise remember St. Nicholas, Wonderworker and bishop of Myra in modern Turkey, and he punched Arius the heretic in the face!

So, y’know…it could be a lot worse. 😉
 
Huh? The distinction to be made here that you’re missing is that Meltzerboy said that what I had written is not befitting a Christian. That is not a matter of doctrine or teaching, but of what he personally feels it’s right for a Christian to say or do. He may indeed have many ideas of what that consists of or does not consist of, but since he is not a Christian himself, those don’t matter outside of his personal opinion (which again, he’s entitled to, but he’s playing outside of his own field at that point). By means of analogy, I may have many ideas of how Muslims should behave toward Christians, but I wouldn’t expect them to abide by my idea of the Muslim moral code over and above their own, should they conflict. After all, they know the sources of their own code better than I could.

And again, the fact is there is precedent for denouncing the false beliefs of others (including universalism, what I’ve taken issue with in Matthew Light’s posts). Indeed, we praise St. Athanasius the Apostolic as the pillar of faith that he was (y’know, Athanasius contra mundum and all that) precisely because he stood up to popular ideas that were wrong. I would never in a million years compare myself or my posting to anything he did (Lord have mercy!), either in character or in importance, but the fact remains that what he did against the false beliefs in his day did not make him less Christian as a result. Heck, we likewise remember St. Nicholas, Wonderworker and bishop of Myra in modern Turkey, and he punched Arius the heretic in the face!

So, y’know…it could be a lot worse. 😉
Your assumption is that his comments about how one should behave as a Christian is based off of his personal opinion formed by the Jewish faith. Unfortunately for your assumption, he has a rather clear record on these forums of having enough knowledge of the Christian faith for the base assumption to be he is talking about how a Christian should behave according to the teachings of the Christian faith.

My objection to your comment isn’t that you denounce false ideas/teachings, but the uncharitable way in which you did it. To start with, it’s frankly impossible to describe someone else’s faith as “quasi-hippie” with any degree of the respect and charity required by the teachings of our faith.
 
Hahaha. You people are a hoot. Only in an environment like this could condemning universalism which is at the heart of Baha’i theosophy (as our fathers did in council against the prevalence of that idea in its own form among certain early Christian writers) be seen as tantamount to condemning others to hell.
Theosophy really doesn’t have anything to do with the Baha’i Faith.

Universalism is the belief that no one is permanently consigned to hell without hope of reprieve.

So if you don’t believe in universalism, you are in fact condemning people to hell. Since you made it clear that faith in Jesus is necessary to qualify as “sons of God”, that seemed to spell great trouble for any Jew who died within the last 2000 years…
That is quite frankly ridiculous, and your own readings of my post, nowhere in the text of what I actually posted. My point was and is that it is wrong to include all manner of non-Christians together with Christians as though there is no distinction between one who actually believes in Christ and the Christian religion (i.e., an actual Christian) and one who does not and thinks it to be corrupted in this or that fashion (as Baha’is do).
I’ve specifically rejected the view that Christianity is corrupted, right here on this forum, just yesterday. And Jesus is, of course, the Son of God and Lord of us all…
All this stuff about Anne Frank burning
You implied it by your rejection of non-Christians as being God’s children.

I’m very glad to find out you do not in fact believe that Anne Frank is burning in hell. I won’t deign to suggest you might be just a little bit influenced by universalism…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top