How can we be modestly dressed when we are swimming

  • Thread starter Thread starter dumbseeker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can GUARANTEE that the tribe you saw was not Muslim! You are unfairly stereotyping Islam and Muslim culture, in the same why that they stereotype Christians.
Secondly, I must say that I agree with point about objectifying woman’s bodies. Too frequently, women in our culture objectify their bodies, by the way they dress! This is because they do not respect themselves or understand human nature. Men and women are wired different. It is a scientific fact, not my opinion. We are different and it is wonderful. God did not make a mistake. Judeo-Christian. I think you are consumed with issues of control. It pervades all or your replies. I am basing my views on Scripture.

Ephesians 5:21-30 “Be subordinate to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives should be subordinate to their husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is head of his wife just as Christ is head of the church, he himself the savior of the body. As the church is subordinate to Christ, so wives should be subordinate to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ loved the church and handed himself over for her to sanctify her, cleansing her by the bath of water with the word,that he might present to himself the church in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. So (also) husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one hates his own flesh but rather nourishes and cherishes it, even as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body.”

Finally, fashions do change based on culture and time, but modesty is conceptual standard. I am sure that you are not suggesting that The Blessed Mother would wear hip hugger jeans, a pierced navel, and a tattoo on Her lower pain. What would Mary wear???

2521 Purity requires modesty, an integral part of temperance. Modesty protects the intimate center of the person. It means refusing to unveil what should remain hidden. It is ordered to chastity to whose sensitivity it bears witness. It guides how one looks at others and behaves toward them in conformity with the dignity of persons and their solidarity.

2522 Modesty protects the mystery of persons and their love. It encourages patience and moderation in loving relationships; it requires that the conditions for the definitive giving and commitment of man and woman to one another be fulfilled. Modesty is decency. It inspires one’s choice of clothing. It keeps silence or reserve where there is evident risk of unhealthy curiosity. It is discreet.
Okay. I will not argue with you. The tribe defined themselves as muslim. But it does not mean that they really are. You are right about that. Some sects call them selves Christians too and that does not mean they grasp even the essentials about Christianity.
As for your oppinions about my person, lets leave that aside and focus on the issue here shall we. We are both arguing our point with equal fervour, probably due to much pondering on this topic since we are both converts, so if I am a control freak, so are you.
Anyway.
I find your question about the Virgin Mary most interesting, however its not new. Simple answer is that Mary of Nazareth was dressed in the clothes which were normal for a woman in Judean culture at year 0. Had she been living today in Israel she would probably have worn skirts knee length or longer or loose pants, nicely shaped shirts and loose long hair. This is how most devout Jewish women dress today.
Had she been living in the diaspora, eg. Europe anno 2009 she would probably be wearing blue jeans and other ordinary clothes from our times. The purity of Mary would not be any less if she did.
Now tell me, was Adam immodest in the Garden? The fact that He was ashamed of his nudity was because of his altered state of mind after his sin, not because of his nudity in itself. He saw with other eyes…
Again, I urge you to look into cultural studies… Look at indian ladies eg. They are devout catholics many of them… but they show a rather big part of their belly. In other cultures this would be unthinkable… are these immodest?
Anyway… I think we are going in circles.
As I said. I am all for modesty. But I dont link certain fashion with the virtue of modesty the way that you do in your subjective post-modern thinking.

As for my ideas on Islam. You are right. I am rather sceptical about Islam and my words do sound biased. I have met good muslims who practiced Islam and who in many ways had what resembled Christlike wisdom… I have severel friends who are Muslims. They try to earn God’s favour and make themselves righteous in His eyes…
I also have a close friend who has fallen away from Islam and is hostile to all religion because of the hypocrisy he has witnessed.
I love these people as my dear friends. But reading the Quran and Hadith and seeing how these texts sanction violence, unhealthy submission of science, sexuality, and of women, I am very very sceptical yes. I believe Islam is a prison that only appears to represent the light. Mohammed was a false prophet and therefore was not sent by the Truth. The True Light is the Son of God Yeshua. As He says: “The one who the Son sets free is FREE indeed”. I wish with all my heart that my muslim friends experience the freedom and love they were created for in the Name of Jesus. If I did not love them I would not care. But I do love them and I do care. “What has the truth to do with the lie? the light with darkness” says St. John…

Salaam, Shalom and Peace to you
 
Not a man, but absolutely agree. Now that statistics show 66% of the American population is overweight or obese, the vast majority should NOT appear in public in a swim suitof any kind out of consideration of others at the beach/pool.
In fact, there is nothing more effective to combat lustul thoughts after accidentally getting an eyeful of nice hair, pretty face, clear skin and curves than to fix your gaze in the general direction of a more …well… eh… less attractive individual.

So in my opinion, if one is trying to maintain purity of thought, these wonderful folks can be of great help.
:o
 
In fact, there is nothing more effective to combat lustul thoughts after accidentally getting an eyeful of nice hair, pretty face, clear skin and curves than to fix your gaze in the general direction of a more …well… eh… less attractive individual.

So in my opinion, if one is trying to maintain purity of thought, these wonderful folks can be of great help.
:o
Then in the name of purity of thought, I shall don my Speedo thong and go joggling down at Kew Beach next summer…

…You’re welcome. 😃
 
Not a man, but absolutely agree. Now that statistics show 66% of the American population is overweight or obese, the vast majority should NOT appear in public in a swim suitof any kind out of consideration of others at the beach/pool.
All joking aside…this is uncharitable, if one says that someone should be covered not for the sake of modesty, but because of perceived ugliness.

If someone should not appear in public in a particular garb because of their appearance, I say that no one should appear in that garb because it is obviously immodest.

Unless you are saying that fat or ugly people should bag their heads, or not go out in public at all.

Now that we’ve decided that we shouldn’t be exposed to muffin-tops, or cankles, or man-boobies, what’s next? Body hair? Varicose veins? Scars? Freckles? Male-pattern baldness? Birthmarks? Only the “Beautiful People” need go out in public anymore? The rest of us ugly mugs only dare darken our doorstep if clad in sackcloth burqas crying “Unclean! Unclean!”?

BTW, I realize a lot of these statements may be made in jest, but I think we must be mindful that, for example, both Grey’s Anatomy’s “Dr McDreamy” and The Elephant Man were made in the image and likeness of God.
 
Okay. I will not argue with you. The tribe defined themselves as muslim. But it does not mean that they really are. You are right about that. Some sects call them selves Christians too and that does not mean they grasp even the essentials about Christianity.
As for your oppinions about my person, lets leave that aside and focus on the issue here shall we. We are both arguing our point with equal fervour, probably due to much pondering on this topic since we are both converts, so if I am a control freak, so are you.
Anyway.
I find your question about the Virgin Mary most interesting, however its not new. Simple answer is that Mary of Nazareth was dressed in the clothes which were normal for a woman in Judean culture at year 0. Had she been living today in Israel she would probably have worn skirts knee length or longer or loose pants, nicely shaped shirts and loose long hair. This is how most devout Jewish women dress today.
Had she been living in the diaspora, eg. Europe anno 2009 she would probably be wearing blue jeans and other ordinary clothes from our times. The purity of Mary would not be any less if she did.
Now tell me, was Adam immodest in the Garden? The fact that He was ashamed of his nudity was because of his altered state of mind after his sin, not because of his nudity in itself. He saw with other eyes…
Again, I urge you to look into cultural studies… Look at indian ladies eg. They are devout catholics many of them… but they show a rather big part of their belly. In other cultures this would be unthinkable… are these immodest?
Anyway… I think we are going in circles.
As I said. I am all for modesty. But I dont link certain fashion with the virtue of modesty the way that you do in your subjective post-modern thinking.

As for my ideas on Islam. You are right. I am rather sceptical about Islam and my words do sound biased. I have met good muslims who practiced Islam and who in many ways had what resembled Christlike wisdom… I have severel friends who are Muslims. They try to earn God’s favour and make themselves righteous in His eyes…
I also have a close friend who has fallen away from Islam and is hostile to all religion because of the hypocrisy he has witnessed.
I love these people as my dear friends. But reading the Quran and Hadith and seeing how these texts sanction violence, unhealthy submission of science, sexuality, and of women, I am very very sceptical yes. I believe Islam is a prison that only appears to represent the light. Mohammed was a false prophet and therefore was not sent by the Truth. The True Light is the Son of God Yeshua. As He says: “The one who the Son sets free is FREE indeed”. I wish with all my heart that my muslim friends experience the freedom and love they were created for in the Name of Jesus. If I did not love them I would not care. But I do love them and I do care. “What has the truth to do with the lie? the light with darkness” says St. John…

Salaam, Shalom and Peace to you
Adam and Eve did not notice their nakedness prior to the fall. Then Original Sin entered and they were aware of their nakedness. Baptism wipes away this Original Sin. But awareness of nakedness remains. This is one of the reasons we wear clothes. By the way, I did not say you were a “Control Freak”. I suggested that the paradigm through which you view this issue is defined by the issue of control. I think this is only one perspective. Also, I think fashion is a dubious term in this discussion. I am not discussing whether something has ruffles, is teal, or matches with a certain type of shoes. Modesty is more concerned, in my opinion, with limits. In Islam, the orthodox view is that these limits are rigid and the onus is on women to conform. This is the way that Islam is actualized among most Muslims. Catholicism is a more nuanced view, in my opinion. I calls its adherents to limits based on love for ourselves and others, as children of God. Since, the fall, we are weak, so we observe limits, but much more flexibly. I think it is Law meeting Grace and it is beautiful when lived out. I don’t think Freedom means License. I think Freedom is the grace given to adhere to the spirit of the Law. My daughter has a book called “All Things Girl” by Theresa Tomeo. It deals with the issue of Bikinis for “Tweenagers” beautifully. 👍
 
The problem Eichen is
Who sets the limits, who defines modesty, and based on what?
I have travelled alot from culture to culture and practiced different dress codes throughout my life. I found that my inner convictions changed according to outer influences.
Innocence is much linked to purity of mind.
I know people who have indulged in much sexual activity who dress modestly and others who are the most innocent of all virgins - I speak mainly here about two of my best friends - who wear sommerdresses I would never wear, simply because they have no clue that everyone else is not so pure of heart as they are. Innocense is not naivete, mind you… Its a great error to assume so.
I want to point out that many, many in the western world wear clothes that are fashionable and revealing not to turn on guys but to look pretty. The men in my culture are used to seeing women dressed like this… I believe even the Christian men here are not as easily aroused by it as some of the Catholic men who have been taught to respond like this…

Grace
 
The problem Eichen is
Who sets the limits, who defines modesty, and based on what?
I have travelled alot from culture to culture and practiced different dress codes throughout my life. I found that my inner convictions changed according to outer influences.
Innocence is much linked to purity of mind.
I know people who have indulged in much sexual activity who dress modestly and others who are the most innocent of all virgins - I speak mainly here about two of my best friends - who wear sommerdresses I would never wear, simply because they have no clue that everyone else is not so pure of heart as they are. Innocense is not naivete, mind you… Its a great error to assume so.
I want to point out that many, many in the western world wear clothes that are fashionable and revealing not to turn on guys but to look pretty. The men in my culture are used to seeing women dressed like this… I believe even the Christian men here are not as easily aroused by it as some of the Catholic men who have been taught to respond like this…

Grace
I am not and have suggested that culture plays no part. It does! But like the nature vs, nurture argument, I think there has to be balance. There are not hard and fast guidelines. Also, you seem to think that you can tell what is in peoples hearts. You don’t know who is innocent and who is licentious. We can only judge what we see. If we are devout Christians (women or men), our dress, speech, and overall behavior will reflect that. For example, Nuns don’t wear bikinis in public. This issue is not that difficult to understand. Read the Bible and Catechism! It is not rocket science.
 
What is the motivation to get tanned?
What is my motivation to get tanned, you ask.

Well, considering that it is currently -19 F where I live, when the sun DOES come out and the temperature does get above 60, I love to be outside soaking up as much sunshine as I can. Being in the sun boosts my spirits, makes me feel good, and boosts my vitamin D intake! It also helps clear up the inevitable adult acne I seem to get every winter. I LIKE it.

That is my motivation.
 
I am not and have suggested that culture plays no part. It does! But like the nature vs, nurture argument, I think there has to be balance. There are not hard and fast guidelines. Also, you seem to think that you can tell what is in peoples hearts. You don’t know who is innocent and who is licentious. We can only judge what we see. If we are devout Christians (women or men), our dress, speech, and overall behavior will reflect that. For example, Nuns don’t wear bikinis in public. This issue is not that difficult to understand. Read the Bible and Catechism! It is not rocket science.
Thats my problem E.
When clothes is used to label people into categories. I have experienced that sad characteristic in Catholic American culture but never in my Catholic or Lutheran or Pentecostal Danish culture. Here we simply do not judge people on account of their attire unless its really extreme.
Why, we are not called to jugde. There is a vast number of reasons why men and women dress the way they do, having to do with climate, culture, time, fashion, beauty, and feeling comfortable. Thats why, when people venture into statements like:
“A woman who wears a bikini is not pious”, or “a man whose pants are hanging on his behind and showing underwear is a bad guy”, I cringe. All such statements and jugdements say so much more about the personality and expectations of the spectator than it does about the person who is being watched.

You say: “You seem to think you can tell what is in peoples hearts.”
This is not true, but I do think its more Christlike to think people have good intentions than that they are full of impurity, lust, and eagerness to seduce.
And yes… I do believe I know something about the women and men closest to me in my life here in my culture. The ones that confide in me. And their way of talking and thinking about modesty is vastly different from many of the posts I have seen here on this American Catholic forum. Now I do not refer to yours, but I have seen some pretty far out posts on this topic in the past.

My thought is that some people here stare themselves blind on what they wrongly perceive as the premeditated faults of others.

Its like if I went to church on sundays always thinking that the people who dont receive Christ on their tongue or kneel during the consecration were doing it out of spite, little faith, to annoy people etc. It would be unbearable if I walked through my days thinking such things about so many of my fellow human beings just because they dont think the same way as I do about certain things and act according to their own consience.

Grace
 
All joking aside…this is uncharitable, if one says that someone should be covered not for the sake of modesty, but because of perceived ugliness.

If someone should not appear in public in a particular garb because of their appearance, I say that no one should appear in that garb because it is obviously immodest.

Unless you are saying that fat or ugly people should bag their heads, or not go out in public at all.

Now that we’ve decided that we shouldn’t be exposed to muffin-tops, or cankles, or man-boobies, what’s next? Body hair? Varicose veins? Scars? Freckles? Male-pattern baldness? Birthmarks? Only the “Beautiful People” need go out in public anymore? The rest of us ugly mugs only dare darken our doorstep if clad in sackcloth burqas crying “Unclean! Unclean!”?

BTW, I realize a lot of these statements may be made in jest, but I think we must be mindful that, for example, both Grey’s Anatomy’s “Dr McDreamy” and The Elephant Man were made in the image and likeness of God.
I don’t think she meant to be uncharitable. It’s just as important for physically unattractive and obese people to cover up as the slim, fit and attractive should.

The sight of the naked human body, depending on it’s appearance can inspire a wide range of emotional as well as physical responses ranging from the magnetic pull of sexual response all the way to the opposite reaction of repulsion.

It’s a reality in nature and a fact of life.

:cool:
 
I don’t think she meant to be uncharitable. It’s just as important for physically unattractive and obese people to cover up as the slim, fit and attractive should.
My point. Covering up should be for the sake of modesty, not to shield someone from accidentally seeing an “ugly person”. And I agree it was not meant to be uncharitable – note my previous reply re: me in a speedo – just to be careful that such a sentiment does not veer into the uncharitable, with judgements made on the worthiness of a particular person’s looks.
40.png
TLM08:
The sight of the naked human body, depending on it’s appearance can inspire a wide range of emotional as well as physical responses ranging from the magnetic pull of sexual response all the way to the opposite reaction of repulsion.
That goes without saying. But those of us “to whom Nature has been unkind”, to put it euphemistically, don’t need to be reminded of it all the time. Many people have a poor self-image as it is – look at the prevalence of eating disorders, just as an example.
40.png
TLM08:
It’s a reality in nature and a fact of life.
Indeed. I’m just sayin’.
 
i definitely admire a woman who dresses modestly, it is extremely difficult to live chastely, in such a sexualized culture.
 
OK. I wear a two piece when i go swimming. I don’t wear one of those string things that haev little triangles to cover up my top and a small strip to cover my bottom. However, I do wear a two piece. And I don’t consciously wear it out swimming so some horny dudes will look at me. I like two pieces…just personal preferance. Do i think it’s sinful…no, becuase i’m not goign out trying to turn some dude on nor am i out there to make other women feel self-conscious, i’m jsut out there to have fun. Now I have had swimsuits that when they got wet they wouldnt’ stay on and i got rid of them. But seriously, like the other person said…it really has to do with culture and how you grew up. I married a man who grew up Southern Baptist and went to a Baptist college. I went swimmign with him one day at the schools pool and he said to me, “You are probably the first girl that has ever worn a two piece in this pool.” I was a little shocked. But then again, I grew up with a pool in teh backyard and we didn’t think of swimsuits as being sexual. They were more for just use. Although i have to say that when people put two pieces on their little 5 year old girls…that’s a little creepy.
 
All joking aside…this is uncharitable, if one says that someone should be covered not for the sake of modesty, but because of perceived ugliness.

If someone should not appear in public in a particular garb because of their appearance, I say that no one should appear in that garb because it is obviously immodest.

Unless you are saying that fat or ugly people should bag their heads, or not go out in public at all.

Now that we’ve decided that we shouldn’t be exposed to muffin-tops, or cankles, or man-boobies, what’s next? Body hair? Varicose veins? Scars? Freckles? Male-pattern baldness? Birthmarks? Only the “Beautiful People” need go out in public anymore? The rest of us ugly mugs only dare darken our doorstep if clad in sackcloth burqas crying “Unclean! Unclean!”?

BTW, I realize a lot of these statements may be made in jest, but I think we must be mindful that, for example, both Grey’s Anatomy’s “Dr McDreamy” and The Elephant Man were made in the image and likeness of God.
YOU know…on a side note. When does being fat or overweight turn into gluttony?
 
What is my motivation to get tanned, you ask.

Well, considering that it is currently -19 F where I live, when the sun DOES come out and the temperature does get above 60, I love to be outside soaking up as much sunshine as I can. Being in the sun boosts my spirits, makes me feel good, and boosts my vitamin D intake! It also helps clear up the inevitable adult acne I seem to get every winter. I LIKE it.

That is my motivation.
Melanoma is a nice side benefit. 😛
 
OK. I wear a two piece when i go swimming. I don’t wear one of those string things that haev little triangles to cover up my top and a small strip to cover my bottom. However, I do wear a two piece. And I don’t consciously wear it out swimming so some horny dudes will look at me. I like two pieces…just personal preferance. Do i think it’s sinful…no, becuase i’m not goign out trying to turn some dude on nor am i out there to make other women feel self-conscious, i’m jsut out there to have fun. Now I have had swimsuits that when they got wet they wouldnt’ stay on and i got rid of them. But seriously, like the other person said…it really has to do with culture and how you grew up. I married a man who grew up Southern Baptist and went to a Baptist college. I went swimmign with him one day at the schools pool and he said to me, “You are probably the first girl that has ever worn a two piece in this pool.” I was a little shocked. But then again, I grew up with a pool in teh backyard and we didn’t think of swimsuits as being sexual. They were more for just use. Although i have to say that when people put two pieces on their little 5 year old girls…that’s a little creepy.
Fine. Your not being aware of it or desiring it does not change that guys are on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top