Interesting, there are several posters claiming that the Catholic Church was founded by Peter and that he is the Rock the church is built on, but other posts saying the exact opposite, and all are Catholic.
I will join with others here and ask you to please point out the posts here that claim the Church is founded
BY Peter. If there are such posts, we need to clear this up because such people would be teaching error.
Overall I fear there may be some miscommunication going on.
What Catholics have to back them up, in addition to the Bible, is the teaching of the Church as contained in the Catechism. When one hears conflicting opinions from Catholics one need only turn to the official, documented Church teaching for clarification.
In this case - If there ARE people who claim the Church was founded by Peter it should only take a couple of minutes to clarify what they mean, and to determine if this fits iwth proper Catholic teaching.
This is the problem with not just relying on the Bible, people have conflicting ideas and there is nothing to back them up but other men’s opinions that have also differed and changed over the past 2000 years.
So - in the last 500 years (the age of Sola Scriptura) there haven’t been conflicting opinions"? Conflicting opinions ALL based firmly on Scripture??
The one that that is unchaining is God and His Word.
Agreed - God is unchanging as is His Word who is Jesus Christ.
That’s why so many people are turning toward the Sola Scriptura idea now.
Yes - and I suspect that they will find the same thing the decedents of the original reformers found…That relying Scripture alone and private (or small group) interpretation will simply NOT lead to the unified Church that Holy Spirit calls fro through the NT writers
People see various churches (not just Catholic) all teaching different things (even with in the same faith system, note the synods of Luthernism all are different), they ask themselves, “why is everyone different?” The only true Rock we can go back to is Jesus and the Bible that was written by inspired men.
you bring out a very important point here and demonstrate by it just how unbiblical the protestant reformation was (and is).
The question is whether, in going back to “Jesus and the Bible” will they be able to avoid the same mistakes made by their Sola Scriptura predecessors.
My prayer is that they will - but my suspicion is that they will not.
The key in this will be whether they actually recognize in reading scripture that Christ DID found an authoritative Church intended to visibly and universally resolve matters of doctrinal disagreement.
AND
If they can do this without prejudices against any previous group or structure.
Do you believe that such can occur?
The fact is there are many thing in the past that are blatantly against Jesus’s commandments, (Crusades anyone?) and there are still things being done today that are unBiblical.
Truly - None are immune to sin. We are all aware of this.
You mention the Crusades - Others can likewise be mentioned. The Native Americans were not treated in a Christian manner nor were the black slaves taken from Africa. And in these things both Catholics and Protestants are equally guilty.
Peace
James