How Come CA bars honest conversations?

[Salibi]

The Pope will not command me to do evil because the Papacy is protected by the Holy Spirit.

The only ones who will burn are “Catholics” who believe otherwise.

 

[Finn]

They’re not supposed to “pull a Luther” and decide to be their own Popes.

This false equivalency doesn’t help further discussions and is fast becoming a Godwin’s Law variation.

 

[fullmetalcatholic]

The office is protected; not the man.

 

[Salibi]

On this, agreed.

I still see nothing with Pope Francis that’s heretical or unCatholic.

 

[DisorientingSneeze]

How I feel in this thread:
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

 

[Fauken]

If I’m a 33rd degree Freemason can I still be a valid candidate for the papacy?

I think you already know the answer to that question.

 

[Gorgias]

How come Catholic Answers apologists who cruise the forum block and ban such posts for asking questions regarding legitimate issues?

Are you asking this seriously?

If the Pope commands you to do evil and you know better and follow the Pope, than yes, you will both burn.

If I’m a 33rd degree Freemason can I still be a valid candidate for the papacy?

And you don’t think inflammatory statements like these are the reason that threads get shut down?

 

[Cruciferi]

Uh, NO.

 

[gracepoole]

 

[niceatheist]

When one has to propose absurd scenarios to make their point, I think it’s at that juncture that you realize they’re not really interested in a serious conversation.

 

[on_the_hill]

If I’m a 33rd degree Freemason can I still be a valid candidate for the papacy?

No. Of course not. That’s a trick question and you are a deceiver. It’s well-known that you have to be a 34th degree Freemason.

 

[on_the_hill]

If the Pope commands you to do evil and you know better and follow the Pope, than yes, you will both burn.

Unless it’s Opposite Day.

Again, you try to deceive us.

 

[po18guy]

I’d like to know more about Agenda 2030 and the Catholic Church - that’s all. How come we’ve been signed over to it? That’s an honest question.

Dig into the web. Call your archdiocese. Email or call the Vatican!

What inevitably follows the asking of “hard” questions, based on limited knowledge or understanding is the typical interwebz badmouthing and division.

If you have interest, then go and learn about it. Discussion without knowledge or understanding risks being plain old gossip, detraction or calumny. If I had to guess, Vatican involvement is to assert or insert Christian belief, practice or freedom into the proposed action of an international body.

Practically speaking: The UN is the most inefficient and ineffective human organization in human history - which is both bad as well as good.

Consider: There is not a single mention of the Christian heritage of Europe in the constitution of the EU. Was the Vatican then guilty of not participating in its formulation?