E
expectthebest
Guest
Yes. I didn’t misunderstand. I’m saying that it is scary to know that the more educated we are in our Faith, the harder it may be to get to heaven.Actually, the concept of invincible ignorance is a church matter. Take, for example, the Sioux nation in pre-Columbian America. The Gospel had not reached them. It is thought that God’s grace is so expansive, that a Sioux member who lived uprightly and did what was right in the eyes of God might also receive justification. This soul had no possibility of knowing about Christ, because the Christians had not yet arrived on the continent. This was ignorance of Christ that could not have been overcome. It seems odd that there would have been no possibility of salvation and that all were doomed to hell.
Once taught the Gospel of Christ, salvation was a matter of accepting or rejecting the Gospel. The opposing position is that the intellectual elite, such as Dawkins and Hitchens, have heard the Gospel, and soundly rejected it. However, they are not justified before God, since they have rejected His offer of salvation. Neither are they excused because they have rationalized the need for salvation away in their own minds. You follow?
The Sioux could not have known of Christ. The intellectuals do know of him, but reject Him. That was my point, although perhaps clumsily made.