R
rossum
Guest
As I said above, follow the instructions in the Visuddhimagga, chapter 13, paragraph 22 on.But how do you verify that you were a rabbit or some other animal in a previous life?
As I said above, follow the instructions in the Visuddhimagga, chapter 13, paragraph 22 on.But how do you verify that you were a rabbit or some other animal in a previous life?
Going on from 22 to 35, we read:As I said above, follow the instructions in the Visuddhimagga, chapter 13, paragraph 22 on.
It is a real stretch to say that you will know if you were a rabbit or a giraffe in the previous life if you follow the instructions given in ch 13 par 22 of the text.I pointed you to a text with instructions to find the answer.
If they are not programmed by intelligent beings, then monkeys should be able to set up a random number generator.o_mlly:
No they are not. That is why I mentioned quantum-level RNGs. See Quantis for just one example.No, a computer cannot emulate those events. The number of different random number generators does not change the nature of a programmed random number generator, i.e., they are all programmed.
Personally I did not; I have not followed that route. I practice vipassana meditation, not samatha meditation. The mention of fourth jhana indicates that Buddhaghosa is talking about samatha meditation in that passage.Let me ask you this: did you or did anyone you know follow those instructions and find out for certain that he was an alligator in the previous life?
You don’t need something as complex as a monkey. A circle will do it for you: the Hex digits of pi. Given any digit sequence you will not be able to predict the next digit because every possible digit sequence appears an infinite number of times in pi.If they are not programmed by intelligent beings, then monkeys should be able to set up a random number generator.
I don’t see how this can be verified as not being anything more than a dream of sorts.If you want to confirm whether or not the result is a dream or real memories of previous lives then you are welcome to try.
This is true. But is non-predictability the same as random?Given any digit sequence you will not be able to predict the next digit because every possible digit sequence appears an infinite number of times in pi.
It is the cryptographic definition of random. Given any amount of past output it is impossible to predict future output better than chance.This is true. But is non-predictability the same as random?
I thought that was the definition of pseudo-random.It is the cryptographic definition of random.
No, a pseudo-random sequence is predictable and repeatable; if you give the generator the same seed then you will get the same sequence of numbers again. That is useful in some cases. With the pi sequence you can never be certain where the starting point was so you can never be sure what the next number will be. In an infinite sequence, all possible subsequences will occur an infinite number of times.I thought that was the definition of pseudo-random.
The point in discussion was programming a genetic algorithm that simulates random mutations. Since the data set from which a random number might generate must be resident or available to the program, infinite data sets are eliminated. Any truncated value of pi faces faces the same impossibility as other discrete data sets accessed programmatically (designed) to obtain a true random number.That is useful in some cases. With the pi sequence you can never be certain where the starting point was so you can never be sure what the next number will be. In an infinite sequence, all possible subsequences will occur an infinite number of times.
Then hook the computer up to a cosmic ray detector, or perhaps an alpha particle detector next to a small piece of uranium. There are plenty of naturally occurring sources of randomness. You do know that random mutations can be caused by radiation?Since the data set from which a random number might generate must be resident or available to the program, infinite data sets are eliminated.
When that hookup actually occurs, send me its output of supposedly random numbers for verification. You do know that randomness is only in the eye of the beholder?Then hook the computer up to a cosmic ray detector, or perhaps an alpha particle detector next to a small piece of uranium. There are plenty of naturally occurring sources of randomness. You do know that random mutations can be caused by radiation?
If the digit is calculated then it cannot be random.PS: using the Plouffe method you do not need to store all the digits of pi, you calculate them as needed.
How easy would it be to set up a genetic algorithm; just using pen and paper without a computerIt is easy to set up a genetic algorithm on a computer and no creation is needed. See NASA antenna design for an example.
Tedious, but doable. You would need a form of random (name removed by moderator)ut, a die perhaps. A computer would be a lot faster.How easy would it be to set up a genetic algorithm; just using pen and paper without a computer
You have a greater understanding of mathematics than most people, including me.Eric_Hyom:
Tedious, but doable. You would need a form of random (name removed by moderator)ut, a die perhaps. A computer would be a lot faster.How easy would it be to set up a genetic algorithm; just using pen and paper without a computer
No. Cosmic rays can cause mutations. Uranium, radon and other radioactive isotopes can cause mutations. Some chemicals can cause mutations. No understanding of mathematics is needed.It seems that random mutation and natural would need a greater understanding of mathematics than even you have.
No sense.No. Cosmic rays can cause mutations. Uranium, radon and other radioactive isotopes can cause mutations. Some chemicals can cause mutations. No understanding of mathematics is needed.
Mathematics is only needed to build a model of the process, not for the actual process itself.