N
niceatheist
Guest
Thank you! A book to add to my reading list.That photo was a page from ‘Infidels’ by Andrew Wheatcroft.
Thank you! A book to add to my reading list.That photo was a page from ‘Infidels’ by Andrew Wheatcroft.
I remember reading Keith Thomas’ book ‘Religion and the Decline of Magic’ where he argued that a large proportion of the population in late Medieval/Early Modern times were pretty clueless about doctrine - the thing is that it’s an argument that isn’t really that significant - the important thing was that the people who were important went along with important beliefs.I have a feeling that most Christians in those territories were along for the ride
"‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master — that’s all.”
Yes but you’re an atheist and might tend to be a bit flippant about that sort of thing, even more than me.So far as I understand it, as long as you understand the basics of the Nicene Creed, you’re good to go!
Well, maybe I’m being a bit flippant But really, as you and I were just discussing, the notion of “properly catechized” is a reasonably new concept. The great unwashed, by and by, probably didn’t know Christianity any deeper than the Nicene Creed. Until literacy became more prevalent in the Modern Era, I don’t think there were a lot of peasant theologians. When the Reformation occurred, I have a feeling that in many cases local populations weren’t versed enough of either Catholic theology or Luther’s ideas to do much more than still show up to Church on Sunday. I’m not saying their faith was weak, I’m saying they didn’t have the time or the resources, or the education, to understand the great debates going on around them.niceatheist:
Yes but you’re an atheist and might tend to be a bit flippant about that sort of thing, even more than me.So far as I understand it, as long as you understand the basics of the Nicene Creed, you’re good to go!
The great unwashed didn’t matter, the rich and sometimes washed were the important ones.The great unwashed, by and by, probably didn’t know Christianity any deeper than the Nicene Creed.
That would certainly seem to be the case by the mid-17th Century.As literacy rates began to climb I think the knowledge of Christianity among the laity, whatever Church they belonged to, became much greater.
I’ve always aspired to be rich and sometimes washed, and I think I’ve found success with the latter part.The great unwashed didn’t matter, the rich and sometimes washed were the important ones.
I remember reading somewhere that King John (of Magna Carta fame) was (by far) England’s most bathed Medieval monarch at one bath a week.I’ve always aspired to be rich and sometimes washed, and I think I’ve found success with the latter part.
And he probably took a lot of health risks in being so, according to the medical knowledge of the era.I remember reading somewhere that King John (of Magna Carta fame) was (by far) England’s most bathed Medieval monarch at one bath a week.
As God or as important religious icon?Catholicism sure. Some more recent versions of Christianity involve belief in Christ and not much else.
Indeed, it was thought to be an indication of moral degeneracy on his part.And he probably took a lot of health risks in being so, according to the medical knowledge of the era.
Such incredible gymnastics that improperly translating technical Greek Christological terms into Latin lead to a permanent schism between Rome and Constantinople.Padres1969:
As God or as important religious icon?Catholicism sure. Some more recent versions of Christianity involve belief in Christ and not much else.
Establishing a man as God has always required religious gymnastics.
The irony was that John was actually a fairly popular King among the common folk, but he lacked the good sense Richard had to spend most of his reign outside of England beating on Turks and Frenchmen.tomarin:
Indeed, it was thought to be an indication of moral degeneracy on his part.And he probably took a lot of health risks in being so, according to the medical knowledge of the era.
Brother to a psychopath but a morally degenerate bather.
When people discuss the filioque, my mind goes into sleep mode.Such incredible gymnastics that improperly translating technical Greek Christological terms into Latin lead to a permanent schism between Rome and Constantinople.
Continual culling of nobles in foreign wars was always a good idea from a regal perspective. Later, syphilis did the job.The irony was that John was actually a fairly popular King among the common folk, but he lacked the good sense Richard had to spend most of his reign outside of England beating on Turks and Frenchmen.
Oh…how…weird. Sinead really did become Muslim. No offense to Muslims…of course.Sinead O’Connor