How did Islam get so popular?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a feeling that most Christians in those territories were along for the ride
I remember reading Keith Thomas’ book ‘Religion and the Decline of Magic’ where he argued that a large proportion of the population in late Medieval/Early Modern times were pretty clueless about doctrine - the thing is that it’s an argument that isn’t really that significant - the important thing was that the people who were important went along with important beliefs.
"‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master — that’s all.”
 
So far as I understand it, as long as you understand the basics of the Nicene Creed, you’re good to go!
Yes but you’re an atheist and might tend to be a bit flippant about that sort of thing, even more than me.
 
40.png
niceatheist:
So far as I understand it, as long as you understand the basics of the Nicene Creed, you’re good to go!
Yes but you’re an atheist and might tend to be a bit flippant about that sort of thing, even more than me.
Well, maybe I’m being a bit flippant 🙂 But really, as you and I were just discussing, the notion of “properly catechized” is a reasonably new concept. The great unwashed, by and by, probably didn’t know Christianity any deeper than the Nicene Creed. Until literacy became more prevalent in the Modern Era, I don’t think there were a lot of peasant theologians. When the Reformation occurred, I have a feeling that in many cases local populations weren’t versed enough of either Catholic theology or Luther’s ideas to do much more than still show up to Church on Sunday. I’m not saying their faith was weak, I’m saying they didn’t have the time or the resources, or the education, to understand the great debates going on around them.
 
Off the top of my head: Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, and Sinead O’Connor.
 
The great unwashed, by and by, probably didn’t know Christianity any deeper than the Nicene Creed.
The great unwashed didn’t matter, the rich and sometimes washed were the important ones.

On the other hand, the religious authorities of the late Middle Ages/Early Modern period had started to become concerned about the fact that the great unwashed were so clueless about even the basics of Christianity - ‘there was some nice guy called Jesus and some shepherds or something’. Lots of superstition, clueless as to the basics.
 
And I’d say the Reformation and Counter-reformation were the beginnings of a renaissance in Christianity. The Council of Trent, for instance, pretty much put an end to incompetent and illiterate priests, creating some proper standards for an educated priesthood. Too late, in many cases, Rome realized that poorly educated Catholics could be vulnerable. On the Protestant side, the printing press was in many ways the technology responsible for disseminating the writings of men like Luther and Calvin, as well as making the availability of the Bible much greater (and A LOT cheaper). As literacy rates began to climb I think the knowledge of Christianity among the laity, whatever Church they belonged to, became much greater.
 
As literacy rates began to climb I think the knowledge of Christianity among the laity, whatever Church they belonged to, became much greater.
That would certainly seem to be the case by the mid-17th Century.

This is a “don’t quote me on this” moment but I remember a Welsh friend of mine telling me about something called the ‘scandal of the Blue Books’ in the 19th Century where the Welsh were subject to a Parliamentary inquiry (after some riots) which decided that the Welsh knew nothing about anything but neglected the fact that the Welsh were remarkably literate but their reading was mainly the Bible.
 
Sorry that’s inappropriate. You are talking about extremism here. Let us remember our Muslim brothers and sisters are following God as they understand Him
 
The great unwashed didn’t matter, the rich and sometimes washed were the important ones.
I’ve always aspired to be rich and sometimes washed, and I think I’ve found success with the latter part.
 
Last edited:
Catholicism sure. Some more recent versions of Christianity involve belief in Christ and not much else.
 
Last edited:
I’ve always aspired to be rich and sometimes washed, and I think I’ve found success with the latter part.
I remember reading somewhere that King John (of Magna Carta fame) was (by far) England’s most bathed Medieval monarch at one bath a week.
 
I remember reading somewhere that King John (of Magna Carta fame) was (by far) England’s most bathed Medieval monarch at one bath a week.
And he probably took a lot of health risks in being so, according to the medical knowledge of the era.
 
Catholicism sure. Some more recent versions of Christianity involve belief in Christ and not much else.
As God or as important religious icon?

Establishing a man as God has always required religious gymnastics.
 
And he probably took a lot of health risks in being so, according to the medical knowledge of the era.
Indeed, it was thought to be an indication of moral degeneracy on his part.

Brother to a psychopath but a morally degenerate bather.
 
40.png
Padres1969:
Catholicism sure. Some more recent versions of Christianity involve belief in Christ and not much else.
As God or as important religious icon?

Establishing a man as God has always required religious gymnastics.
Such incredible gymnastics that improperly translating technical Greek Christological terms into Latin lead to a permanent schism between Rome and Constantinople.
 
40.png
tomarin:
And he probably took a lot of health risks in being so, according to the medical knowledge of the era.
Indeed, it was thought to be an indication of moral degeneracy on his part.

Brother to a psychopath but a morally degenerate bather.
The irony was that John was actually a fairly popular King among the common folk, but he lacked the good sense Richard had to spend most of his reign outside of England beating on Turks and Frenchmen.
 
Such incredible gymnastics that improperly translating technical Greek Christological terms into Latin lead to a permanent schism between Rome and Constantinople.
When people discuss the filioque, my mind goes into sleep mode.
 
The irony was that John was actually a fairly popular King among the common folk, but he lacked the good sense Richard had to spend most of his reign outside of England beating on Turks and Frenchmen.
Continual culling of nobles in foreign wars was always a good idea from a regal perspective. Later, syphilis did the job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top