B
BobObob
Guest
Part 2/2
Also, I’m guessing that for most cultures that permit great or even full exposure of the human body, that there were no particular people or generation which formally introduced it. It was probably how things have been for thousands of years for some cultures, deriving their customs only by very gradual changes.
Also, a pope requiring a certain coverage of the body is a matter of Church discipline, rather than doctrine, such as the mandate for the practice of priestly celibacy.
I haven’t heard of whatever you’re referring to in Poland.
Based on this, I wouldn’t say that “it has been attempted, and failed miserably.” Overall, it seems that countries in which there is less casual nudity, there are more problems with lust and porn.
Of course, other factors that may contribute other than dress should be controlled for when analyzing cultures to see what works.
I’d say that I largely disagree with St. Alphonsus Liguori in the sense that I think particular customs regarding the exposure of the human body are not morally evil per se. Customs regarding clothing are morally evil, IMHO, only to the extent that they disrespect the body (or cause other problems, such as tempting others to sin).“St. Alphonsus Liguori, Doctor of the Church, admitting that a *limited *measure of immodest exposure can cease to be a grave snare to people who have grown use to it, adds that those who first introduce it when it is a grave snare, sin gravely, and he makes it clear that there are limits beyond which customariness does not remove the grave snare. The holy office under Pius IX favored this view, requiring the adoption of some body coverage, in the interest of modesty, of savages who wish to become Catholic.”
so even though it may become the norm, to introduce it is a grave sin, and it is only limitedly acceptable,
and even though it was the norm, they were still required to take on more modest dress if they wished to become Catholic.
Also, I’m guessing that for most cultures that permit great or even full exposure of the human body, that there were no particular people or generation which formally introduced it. It was probably how things have been for thousands of years for some cultures, deriving their customs only by very gradual changes.
Also, a pope requiring a certain coverage of the body is a matter of Church discipline, rather than doctrine, such as the mandate for the practice of priestly celibacy.
I’ve heard about this practice in Japan, as well as the sexual immorality there. I’m certainly no expert on their culture, but I think there are plenty of other problems they have there to contribute to sexual immorality, such as their spirituality (worldreligion.nielsonpi.com/16japan.html ) and high-stress lives (extremely high suicide rates). I have also recently heard that they are often stricter when it comes to sexual morality (answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080125214503AAjZKP6 ), so I’m really not sure what to think of this (I don’t know enough about that culture).well, it is common in Japan for families to bathe together, to see eachother naked, and it is done in a clean and casual manner,
however, Japan has more problems with porn then most others, and they also have high percentages of rape,
the idea of introducing nudity to a society in the way you are saying is really nothing new, it has been attempted, and failed miserably,
i think one place that tried was Poland, which as a result ended up only becoming more perverted and immoral then any other country.
I haven’t heard of whatever you’re referring to in Poland.
Based on this, I wouldn’t say that “it has been attempted, and failed miserably.” Overall, it seems that countries in which there is less casual nudity, there are more problems with lust and porn.
I don’t think that opposing all forms of nudity “does not effect anyone in a negative way.” Again, I think culture where they don’t freak out over occasional, situational, casual, nudity tend to have less problems with the human body, including less problems with porn and lust.here’s the basic facts - nudity can and does effect people in a negative way that can be and is deadly to the soul, whereas modesty does not effect anyone in a negative way, and is not a cause for temptation at all,
so in my humble opinion, modesty is the safer more reasonable route.
Of course, other factors that may contribute other than dress should be controlled for when analyzing cultures to see what works.