M
mikeledes
Guest
I strongly suggest that before engaging in any discussion with a Calvinist, a Catholic must learn the Catholic view of predestination. We may not be identical to Calvinists, but we are not Arminians either.
Here are some articles:
thecatholicfaith.com/Teachings/predestination.htm
romancatholicism.org/akin-tulip.htm
thesumma.info/predestination/predestination4.php
All Catholic theologians (Thomist and Molinist) adhere to the follwoing principles:
Michael
Here are some articles:
thecatholicfaith.com/Teachings/predestination.htm
romancatholicism.org/akin-tulip.htm
thesumma.info/predestination/predestination4.php
All Catholic theologians (Thomist and Molinist) adhere to the follwoing principles:
God Bless,We shall return to this point. But in any case, from this minimum admitted by all we get three propositions to which all Catholic theologians subscribe. They are: (1) Predestination to the first grace is not because God foresaw our naturally good works, nor is the beginning of salutary acts due to natural causes; (2) predestination to glory is not because God foresaw we would continue in the performance of supernaturally meritorious acts apart from the special gift of final perseverance; (3) complete predestination, in so far as it comprises the whole series of graces from the first up to glorification, is gratuitous or previous to foreseen merits. These three propositions are admitted by all Catholic theologians. But Thomists and Augustinians on the one hand, and Molinists and congruists on the other, differ in their interpretation of them.
Michael