U
underacloud
Guest
I agree with this.I don’t want anyone to take this the wrong way, because I don’t think that there’s anything wrong with man being involved with NFP. But, you are asking your husband to bond with you over your monthly cycle. As a nonbeliever myself I can tell you that you are extremely lucky that he’s on board with NFP and the abstinence involved. He must really love you to make such a sacrifice. You do it for god, but your husband does it for you.
However, I think asking him to bond over it is a bit much. I’m not even sure how he could go about doing that, and I really don’t see how it would make him feel closer to you to try.
Your husband is who he is. You can’t expect him to be a devout catholic husband to you when that’s not the person he is to start with.
I think you (OP) should be very grateful that your husband does this for you at all. I would not push it any further. Perhaps for some couples it has been a great bonding experience, but I never found this to be the case. There are invariably days where there is disappointment and that’s just a reality of NFP. Being involved in the process never made me feel any better about it.
I honestly can’t think of any way you should change what you and your husband are doing. He is making a great sacrifice for you already.
Yes, I (husband) was the one who primarily interpreted charts in our marriage. Given we have more children than we planned, either her charting was off (she was pretty lax about the whole thing), my intepretations were off (hormones can certainly affect the way you read the data), or we were deliberately too risky on occasion. But I wouldn’t change any of it.My wife takes temps and charts. I interpret the charts. So, it’s me who says yes or no.
Observations are facts. I don’t tell her we need a temp of such and such or whatever. She just records the facts.