I also know about hudna - no treaty can last longer than 10 years and can be broken as soon as muslims are rearmed/regrouped.
Dear Agabriel, hudna simply means truce or ceasefire.
here’s a link that shows how the word was used in classical arabic and modern time.
Maybe you are not aware but the Quran was revealed to the prophet Muhammad (saws) over a period of 23 years. The verses or group of verses were revealed due to circumstances the prophet and early Muslims faced.
More on the topic here
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbab_al-nuzul
The one who acted aggressively and treacherously was mohammed who waged offensive wars against people he knew were poorly armed, in caravans that had women and children that were not heavily armed, and cities that were not known for their armies but for trade and crops.
While I don’t mean to patronize you here, what you wrote above is a lie either through your ignorance or biased against islam.
I challenge you to back up the above quote with 1 credible example.
He at least two that we know of assasinated, he lusted after another man’s wife and ended out getting her because he said Allah said it was ok, and had a man tortured to get the rest of his loot, and waged so many offensive wars and raids that no one has an exact count except that they know it was well over 50. He would raid for loot and slaves.
You can try to rewrite history, but it won’t fly here.
The prophet did not lust after another man’s wife, Zainab bint Jahsh wasn’t happy in her marriage to the prophet’s addopted son Zaid ibn Haritha so they divorced. However, pre-islamic culture considered it a taboo to marry the ex-wife of an adopted son. The prophet desired to marry Zainab after her divorce but was sensitive to pre-islamic culture which considered marriage to an adopted son’s ex-wife as incest.
More on the topic here
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaynab_bint_Jahsh#Marriages
These so called ‘open enemies’ were just ones that didn’t want islam and found it false. It is the same today. You are telling me that the hadiths are false while the translations are the accepted translations. And by the way I downloaded the hadiths too even the hadiths that were censored by USC so as to know what the muslims have that we are not supposed to see anymore.
wrong, the open enemies that persecuted the prophet’s family were muslims, at least outwardly.
Sorry, more taqiyya/kithman.
If you believe Taqiyya is practiced by all muslims then you are wrong, It is a shia only belief. Sunnis don’t believe or practice it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya
- Intentionally preventing unbelievers from Understanding Qur’an-> 17:45-76
There were spiritual barriers between the Holy Prophet and the disbelievers, because, inspite of what is stated in the preceding verse, they cut themselves off from the true nature and therefore were isolated from the messenger of Allah. The hidden veil, put by Allah between the Holy Prophet and them, sometimes made them unable to see him even when he was standing before them, while they were seeing other things.
This happened in the case of Abu Lahab’s wife, when she heard Surah 111 revealed about her she was infuriated and headed towards the Ka’bah where the prophet and abu bakr were sitting.
She said to abu bakr “I hear that Muhammad is satirizing me. If I find him I will smash him. We reject the reprobate. His words we repudiate; His religion, we loathe and hate.”
meanwhile the prophet was sitting beside him yet she didn’t see him due to the Veil Allah placed between her and the prophet.
I also don’t need a lesson in 7th century politics. psst, we are in the 21st century. Many countries are honoring trade agreements with the likes of Saudi Arabia, as an example - the biggest exporter of jihadists, the biggest funder of jihadist training. Oh, but you don’t look at that as aggression, or war, do you? It is ‘opening up the world to islam’ and your jihadists are just doing a day’s work. ho hum.
what you need is a lesson in objectivity and manners. About saudi arabia and the Jihadi’s You are barking up the wrong tree, I don’t support, believe or condone what they are doing.
Where was there any dirty language in her post? Did I miss something?
