P
PRmerger
Guest
What is it youāre saying, 1beleevr? That what you see with your eyes is only that which you believe?]
Emmanuel was physically visible to the naked eye; whereas He is not in the eucharist!![]()
What is it youāre saying, 1beleevr? That what you see with your eyes is only that which you believe?]
Emmanuel was physically visible to the naked eye; whereas He is not in the eucharist!![]()
Of course He is visible in the Eucharist - He looks like bread and wine!]
Emmanuel was physically visible to the naked eye; whereas He is not in the eucharist!![]()
Now, correct me if Iām wrong, 1beleevr, but didnāt we have a conversation way back when about church shopping?This represented one of the reasons I chose my current church
And why I listed it. Only moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking music doesnāt define TRUTH, and I can listen to it whenever I want to, and I donāt have to use my Sunday morning worship time to go to a concert.]
Actually nondenominational churches have some of the best, moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking Christian music I have heard!
only if it makes you laugh. When I wrote it, it was based on observation. And this observation doesnāt make me laugh. It breaks my heart.Is that a protestant joke?
]What is it youāre saying, 1beleevr? That what you see with your eyes is only that which you believe?
]And why I listed it. Only moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking music doesnāt define TRUTH, and I can listen to it whenever I want to, and I donāt have to use my Sunday morning worship time to go to a concert.![]()
]And why I listed it. Only moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking music doesnāt define TRUTH, and I can listen to it whenever I want to, and I donāt have to use my Sunday morning worship time to go to a concert.![]()
Amen!]Not at all; for faith does not dwell in the house of certainty!
Hereās the comparison:But, comparing God in the flesh to Jesus in the eucharist, is apples and oranges!
You are absolutely correct. I am certain that your experiences in your Protestant churches are true and deep and wonderful. I donāt think Iāve ever suggested otherwise.Using your logic, we non-catholics could say that we feel Him, and experience deep communion with Him(we do BTW), as we partake of communion! You do not have the market cornered on meeting Him this way!![]()
]Now, correct me if Iām wrong, 1beleevr, but didnāt we have a conversation way back when about church shopping?
So do you do some church-shopping, 1beleevr, to find a church that fit with YOUR theology?
That always puzzles me when people leave a denomination because they disagree with the pastorās interpretation of Scriptures. Didnāt they know he was a fallible man when they joined the denomination?
And church-shopping puzzles me, too, as it seems arrogant to go looking for something that matches your own fallible, non-authoritative interpretations of Scripture, rather than conforming your beliefs to Christās teachings.
Why are you so quick to dismiss the non-catholic observance of communion? Every time I take communion, I am weeping with joyful tears; drawn to my Saviourās side, through the partaking of the bread and juice! And I donāt believe the eucharist is the only way to receive Christ!Amen!
Hereās the comparison:
You said that itās āinterestingā that Jesus is present āunder the appearanceā of bread and wine. I understand you to mean that this is really too unbelievable. It looks like bread and wine, therefore it isāis that your argument, 1beleevr?
In response we Catholics say: Itās also āinterestingā that God appeared as a man. That, too, sounds unbelievable. I mean, he looked like a mere manācertainly not Divine in appearance!
So if you believe God can appear as a man, then itās also possible to believe that Jesus can appear as bread and wine.
You are absolutely correct. I am certain that your experiences in your Protestant churches are true and deep and wonderful. I donāt think Iāve ever suggested otherwise.
However, only those who have the Eucharist at their liturgies have the most intimate form of communion with Himāthe One Flesh Union. There is no other way to receive Him this intimately than through the Eucharist. This is the Marital Embrace between the Lover and His Beloved.
The marital embrace between husband and wife is only an icon, or a reflection, of the True Union we share with Him in the Eucharist. How magnficent is* that*, 1beleevr? Donāt you long to be united with Him in thos One Flesh Union?
sigh!Why are you so quick to dismiss the non-catholic observance of communion? Every time I take communion, I am weeping with joyful tears; drawn to my Saviourās side, through the partaking of the bread and juice! And I donāt believe the eucharist is the only way to receive Christ!
]Of course He is visible in the Eucharist - He looks like bread and wine!
A lot of people didnāt believe that God would come to the earth looking like a man, either.![]()
]sigh!
I just said, I believe, that I believe Protestant churches have a deep and wonderful experience of God.
I dismiss nothing which you experience. Again: I dismiss nothing about your experience of Christ.
I respect and admire your love of God and love of His Word, dear Friend and Brother in Christ.
[You simply do not have the One Flesh Union. There is no Marital Embrace. :sad_yes:
Just because you donāt call it a concert, doesnāt mean thatās not what the people get when they go there. See what happens if your music ministers donāt show up. I know, I am a former music minister. Just give it time. You see, when the music minister doesnāt show up at my Catholic Church, or the pastor is switched for an old retired priest who doesnāt speak in a dialect I understand, Jesus still shows up.]
And we donāt use our Sunday morning worship time for concerts, either! We make a joyful noise unto Our Lord(Psalms 100:1), you know, like when David and the people were celebrating the return of the Ark of the Covenant? You see, itās alright to let your hair down and honor your Heavenly Father with either solemn,slow worship and praise songs or hand clapping, soul charging āWE love You, Lord,ā songs! And pope John Paul II was right, we as Believers, need to proclaim Christ to ALL nations, and ALL peoples; every last one of us who claim the title of Christian!![]()
But do you eat His true Body and drink His true Blood?]
And yet, I am lacking in nothing; He gives me everything I need!![]()
Or do you just partake in a symbol?Jesus said to them, "Amen, amen, I say to you,
unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood,
you do not have life within you.
Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life,
and I will raise him on the last day.
For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
John 6:53-55
I tested it and found it wanting. I am in my 2nd generation of CCM right now. I was a CCM front-row groupie in the 80s, now my son is following in my footsteps. Oh yeah, his dad was a CCM deejay.]
How do you know, as an ordinary believer, that contemporary Christian music does not define TRUTH?
As I posted to you earlier:]
And yet, I am lacking in nothing; He gives me everything I need!![]()
You said this way better than me.As I posted to you earlier:
I have no doubt that your friendship with Christ is fulfilling and admirable. Itās just that you and He cannot consummate your relationship without the Eucharist. You and Jesus are best buddies. [SIGN1]But not One Flesh.[/SIGN1]
Think of it this way: You and Jesus have a platonic friendship. Heās your beloved friend and you can call him up any time and heāll meet you wherever you are. Catholics have a āspousalā relationship with Christ. We can call him up any time and heāll meet with us wherever we are, too, but whenever we want to share a marital embrace, an intimate One Flesh Union, we go to a special place to do that.