How do non-denominational Christians pick a church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xavierlives
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
]

Emmanuel was physically visible to the naked eye; whereas He is not in the eucharist!šŸ˜‰
Of course He is visible in the Eucharist - He looks like bread and wine!

A lot of people didn’t believe that God would come to the earth looking like a man, either. 🤷
 
This represented one of the reasons I chose my current church
Now, correct me if I’m wrong, 1beleevr, but didn’t we have a conversation way back when about church shopping?

So do you do some church-shopping, 1beleevr, to find a church that fit with YOUR theology?

That always puzzles me when people leave a denomination because they disagree with the pastor’s interpretation of Scriptures. Didn’t they know he was a fallible man when they joined the denomination?

And church-shopping puzzles me, too, as it seems arrogant to go looking for something that matches your own fallible, non-authoritative interpretations of Scripture, rather than conforming your beliefs to Christ’s teachings.
 
I do not know if my experience is with a non-denominational religion, but it could have been. My former wife stated and we went to churches that seemingly had the ā€œbestā€ preacher. Of course, listening to an awe inspiring sermon was neat,……but was it correct?

My wife’s family thought this was the way. As a Catholic, I tried to live my beliefs.

My former spouse chose a belief in presentation. I have not been a proper example, yet maybe I am one of the other 33,000 denominations that have a different perspective. :):)šŸ™‚
 
]

Actually nondenominational churches have some of the best, moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking Christian music I have heard!
And why I listed it. Only moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking music doesn’t define TRUTH, and I can listen to it whenever I want to, and I don’t have to use my Sunday morning worship time to go to a concert. :cool:
 
What is it you’re saying, 1beleevr? That what you see with your eyes is only that which you believe?
]

Not at all; for faith does not dwell in the house of certainty! But, comparing God in the flesh to Jesus in the eucharist, is apples and oranges! Using your logic, we non-catholics could say that we feel Him, and experience deep communion with Him(we do BTW), as we partake of communion! You do not have the market cornered on meeting Him this way!😃
 
And why I listed it. Only moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking music doesn’t define TRUTH, and I can listen to it whenever I want to, and I don’t have to use my Sunday morning worship time to go to a concert. :cool:
]

And we don’t use our Sunday morning worship time for concerts, either! We make a joyful noise unto Our Lord(Psalms 100:1), you know, like when David and the people were celebrating the return of the Ark of the Covenant? You see, it’s alright to let your hair down and honor your Heavenly Father with either solemn,slow worship and praise songs or hand clapping, soul charging ā€œWE love You, Lord,ā€ songs! And pope John Paul II was right, we as Believers, need to proclaim Christ to ALL nations, and ALL peoples; every last one of us who claim the title of Christian!šŸ‘
 
And why I listed it. Only moving, soul-soothing, house-rocking music doesn’t define TRUTH, and I can listen to it whenever I want to, and I don’t have to use my Sunday morning worship time to go to a concert. :cool:
]

How do you know, as an ordinary believer, that contemporary Christian music does not define TRUTH?
 
]Not at all; for faith does not dwell in the house of certainty!
Amen!
But, comparing God in the flesh to Jesus in the eucharist, is apples and oranges!
Here’s the comparison:

You said that it’s ā€œinterestingā€ that Jesus is present ā€œunder the appearanceā€ of bread and wine. I understand you to mean that this is really too unbelievable. It looks like bread and wine, therefore it is–is that your argument, 1beleevr?

In response we Catholics say: It’s also ā€œinterestingā€ that God appeared as a man. That, too, sounds unbelievable. I mean, he looked like a mere man–certainly not Divine in appearance!

So if you believe God can appear as a man, then it’s also possible to believe that Jesus can appear as bread and wine.
Using your logic, we non-catholics could say that we feel Him, and experience deep communion with Him(we do BTW), as we partake of communion! You do not have the market cornered on meeting Him this way!😃
You are absolutely correct. I am certain that your experiences in your Protestant churches are true and deep and wonderful. I don’t think I’ve ever suggested otherwise.

However, only those who have the Eucharist at their liturgies have the most intimate form of communion with Him–the One Flesh Union. There is no other way to receive Him this intimately than through the Eucharist. This is the Marital Embrace between the Lover and His Beloved.

The marital embrace between husband and wife is only an icon, or a reflection, of the True Union we share with Him in the Eucharist. How magnficent is* that*, 1beleevr? Don’t you long to be united with Him in thos One Flesh Union?
 
Now, correct me if I’m wrong, 1beleevr, but didn’t we have a conversation way back when about church shopping?

So do you do some church-shopping, 1beleevr, to find a church that fit with YOUR theology?

That always puzzles me when people leave a denomination because they disagree with the pastor’s interpretation of Scriptures. Didn’t they know he was a fallible man when they joined the denomination?

And church-shopping puzzles me, too, as it seems arrogant to go looking for something that matches your own fallible, non-authoritative interpretations of Scripture, rather than conforming your beliefs to Christ’s teachings.
]

We most likely did, but I don’t recall saying that I was church shopping, or was a church gypsy, to coin a phrase;) And since we both are led by fallible men, it comes down to a question of faith and interpretation! just because I’m not catholic, does not mean I don’t follow Christ’s teachings, or that I have my own theology! I meet many people from all walks of life who, for one reason or another, disregard or dismiss one or more of Christ’s teachings.He told US too go into all the earth, baptizzing in the name of the Father the Son, and the Holy Spirit, making disciples of all, and yet, we find excuses not to! I am so blessed to be able to take the Gospel to wherever I go, not feeling any shame about my beautiful, wonderful Saviour! Just last week, our church went to a homeless center and fed over 120 families, praying with them, and sharing God’s love with them. If this is what you would call my own theology, then maybe I need to change tactics! Jesus also taught US to love others as orselves. Are we able to do that?
 
Amen!

Here’s the comparison:

You said that it’s ā€œinterestingā€ that Jesus is present ā€œunder the appearanceā€ of bread and wine. I understand you to mean that this is really too unbelievable. It looks like bread and wine, therefore it is–is that your argument, 1beleevr?

In response we Catholics say: It’s also ā€œinterestingā€ that God appeared as a man. That, too, sounds unbelievable. I mean, he looked like a mere man–certainly not Divine in appearance!

So if you believe God can appear as a man, then it’s also possible to believe that Jesus can appear as bread and wine.

You are absolutely correct. I am certain that your experiences in your Protestant churches are true and deep and wonderful. I don’t think I’ve ever suggested otherwise.

However, only those who have the Eucharist at their liturgies have the most intimate form of communion with Him–the One Flesh Union. There is no other way to receive Him this intimately than through the Eucharist. This is the Marital Embrace between the Lover and His Beloved.

The marital embrace between husband and wife is only an icon, or a reflection, of the True Union we share with Him in the Eucharist. How magnficent is* that*, 1beleevr? Don’t you long to be united with Him in thos One Flesh Union?
Why are you so quick to dismiss the non-catholic observance of communion? Every time I take communion, I am weeping with joyful tears; drawn to my Saviour’s side, through the partaking of the bread and juice! And I don’t believe the eucharist is the only way to receive Christ!
 
Why are you so quick to dismiss the non-catholic observance of communion? Every time I take communion, I am weeping with joyful tears; drawn to my Saviour’s side, through the partaking of the bread and juice! And I don’t believe the eucharist is the only way to receive Christ!
sigh!

I just said, I believe, that I believe Protestant churches have a deep and wonderful experience of God.

I dismiss nothing which you experience. Again: I dismiss nothing about your experience of Christ.

I respect and admire your love of God and love of His Word, dear Friend and Brother in Christ.

You simply do not have the One Flesh Union. There is no Marital Embrace. :sad_yes:
 
Of course He is visible in the Eucharist - He looks like bread and wine!

A lot of people didn’t believe that God would come to the earth looking like a man, either. 🤷
]

He just isn’t visible as He was depicted by artists, so you must close your eyes and feel Him and imagine that He is with you; much like I do when I partake of communion! Amazing, huh; prophets told of the Messiah coming as a child, and people scoffed! many today would probably do the same! To believe that the God who spoke the universe into existence, could manifest Himself in human form, was a bit much for many of that era to absorb! Isn’t faith a wonderful thing? It is how I commune with my Saviour whether in prayer, while fasting, or partaking of communion!šŸ‘
 
sigh!

I just said, I believe, that I believe Protestant churches have a deep and wonderful experience of God.

I dismiss nothing which you experience. Again: I dismiss nothing about your experience of Christ.

I respect and admire your love of God and love of His Word, dear Friend and Brother in Christ.

[You simply do not have the One Flesh Union. There is no Marital Embrace. :sad_yes:
]

And yet, I am lacking in nothing; He gives me everything I need!šŸ‘
[/QUOTE]
 
]

And we don’t use our Sunday morning worship time for concerts, either! We make a joyful noise unto Our Lord(Psalms 100:1), you know, like when David and the people were celebrating the return of the Ark of the Covenant? You see, it’s alright to let your hair down and honor your Heavenly Father with either solemn,slow worship and praise songs or hand clapping, soul charging ā€œWE love You, Lord,ā€ songs! And pope John Paul II was right, we as Believers, need to proclaim Christ to ALL nations, and ALL peoples; every last one of us who claim the title of Christian!šŸ‘
Just because you don’t call it a concert, doesn’t mean that’s not what the people get when they go there. See what happens if your music ministers don’t show up. I know, I am a former music minister. Just give it time. You see, when the music minister doesn’t show up at my Catholic Church, or the pastor is switched for an old retired priest who doesn’t speak in a dialect I understand, Jesus still shows up.
 
]

And yet, I am lacking in nothing; He gives me everything I need!šŸ‘
But do you eat His true Body and drink His true Blood?
Jesus said to them, "Amen, amen, I say to you,
unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood,
you do not have life within you.
Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life,
and I will raise him on the last day.
For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
John 6:53-55
Or do you just partake in a symbol?
 
]

How do you know, as an ordinary believer, that contemporary Christian music does not define TRUTH?
I tested it and found it wanting. I am in my 2nd generation of CCM right now. I was a CCM front-row groupie in the 80s, now my son is following in my footsteps. Oh yeah, his dad was a CCM deejay.
 
]

And yet, I am lacking in nothing; He gives me everything I need!šŸ‘
As I posted to you earlier:

I have no doubt that your friendship with Christ is fulfilling and admirable. It’s just that you and He cannot consummate your relationship without the Eucharist. You and Jesus are best buddies. [SIGN1]But not One Flesh.[/SIGN1]

Think of it this way: You and Jesus have a platonic friendship. He’s your beloved friend and you can call him up any time and he’ll meet you wherever you are. Catholics have a ā€œspousalā€ relationship with Christ. We can call him up any time and he’ll meet with us wherever we are, too, but whenever we want to share a marital embrace, an intimate One Flesh Union, we go to a special place to do that.
 
As I posted to you earlier:

I have no doubt that your friendship with Christ is fulfilling and admirable. It’s just that you and He cannot consummate your relationship without the Eucharist. You and Jesus are best buddies. [SIGN1]But not One Flesh.[/SIGN1]

Think of it this way: You and Jesus have a platonic friendship. He’s your beloved friend and you can call him up any time and he’ll meet you wherever you are. Catholics have a ā€œspousalā€ relationship with Christ. We can call him up any time and he’ll meet with us wherever we are, too, but whenever we want to share a marital embrace, an intimate One Flesh Union, we go to a special place to do that.
You said this way better than me.

More on Spousal Theology. Don’t worry, it’s probably more palatable to an evangelical than to many Catholics…
christopherwest.com/page.asp?ContentID=70
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top