G
guanophore
Guest
Thanks very much! I am all cleared up now.Bear in mind this is an explanation of classical Pentecostal theology. Other Pentecostals may or may not agree.
Classical Pentecostals believe there are several different uses of tongues. They are:
(Pentecostals who do not believe that tongues are the initial physical evidence of Spirit baptism will only include individual praying in the first category.)
- tongues as the evidence of baptism in the Holy Spirit and in individual praying,
- tongues as a gift (in the stricter sense used here)
The difference is not one of “essence” since in both situations one is speaking unknown languages as the Spirit gives utterance. The difference is one of purpose: one is to edify one’s own spirit and the other is for edifying the congregation.
Therefore, when Paul states that not everyone speaks in tongues, Pentecostals would limit that statement to the gift of tongues used for public instruction and congregational edification. Pentecostals believe all Christians have the potential to possess a prayer language for personal edification.
Take myself as an example. I am 21 years old. I was born again when I was 10 years old. I was baptized with the Holy Spirit when I was in the eighth grade. When this occurred, one of the immediate evidences and the only physical one was that I spoke in tongues. Since that time, I have been able to pray and worship God in an unknown language and make regular use of this wonderful blessing. However, I have never gave a message in tongues to anyone let alone an entire congregation. I wouldn’t even know how to explain such an experience to you because it has just never happened to me.
So I would say I have tongues for personal use in my life. Still, it is not building up anyone but myself, so strictly speaking, in my case it is not the gift of tongues because it is not benefiting the rest of the church.
So, what brings you here to CAF?