J
Jelrak_TB
Guest
I appreciate the analogy…it certainly has some plausibility…yet such a scenario seemingly implies no means of imparting sufficient knowledge to the child so as to have them understand (which may well be the case with a 2 year-old, mind you…), but would such truly be the case with God, for whom all things might be possible…? Yet perhaps it is not communicated for reasons even further removed than this…?Do you immunize your children, TB, assuming you are a parent (and if you’re not, try to be charitable to the analogy and think in the abstract)?
Imagine how it looks from a 5 yr old’s POV. “This Big Mean Father is holding me down so mean nurses can stick me over and over and over again with a painful needle!”
But we all know that good parents will indeed hold down their children so they can “suffer” with the pain of shots.
And there is no explanation which will console this 5 yr old into saying, “Oh, thank you, Father! I get it now! You are creating immunogenic agents in my system so I can fight disease. You do love me!”
Yet surely this must stand as cold comfort to the mother and her daughter that God might appear to have such a limited presence in their current reality to withhold the potential positive aspects of their current suffering…?
Regardless, it would not be honest to claim that simply because God does not behave as might be expected that He equally not exist…seemingly it appears more to speak against the concept that He might truly have a meaningful relationship with individuals during the brief period in which their choices and interactions allegedly might make the most difference. For if one might seek to ask one’s father why, would one consider one’s father to be close and caring should he continuously fail to respond?