M
MrEmpiricism
Guest
In dividing belief from knowledge???In dividing belief from knowledge, atheists often allow themselves the ability to gauge one another’s specific outlooks. It is perhaps more absurd to the theist who, as you have already mentioned, would be hard-pressed to explain a belief in a given god that they paradoxically doubt to exist (although I have encountered one who claimed this very stance), but for the atheist it is often helpful as it delivers more insight into the degree or direction of the given atheist so described. Thus as an agnostic-weak-atheist I claim only to be aware that I currently (and may forever) lack sufficient knowledge to make a definitive statement with regards to the existence of a god or gods, but as a weak atheist I have made a conscious decision to assess the limited information that I have to this point acquired in a direction that leads me to lack a belief in such a thing. Essentially, in an effort to distinguish myself from a strong, positive (or militant) atheist, I am declaring:
I do not currently believe in God/gods; I do not know that this is definitively or objectively true; I would be potentially willing to change my position with sufficient evidence or a given level of experience.
They are totally different things, that has nothing to do the atheism or theism.