B
Bohm_Bawerk
Guest
Please don’t just say “faith”
. There is a reason behind everything. Why do you personally believe that God, or a god, exists?
Thank you,
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk
Thank you,
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk
Oh, I see…The “Designer Argument”.When you look at the complexity in creation.![]()
I answer that, The existence of God can be proved in five ways.
The first and more manifest way is the argument from motion. It is certain, and evident to our senses, that in the world some things are in motion. Now whatever is in motion is put in motion by another, for nothing can be in motion except it is in potentiality to that towards which it is in motion; whereas a thing moves inasmuch as it is in act. For motion is nothing else than the reduction of something from potentiality to actuality. But nothing can be reduced from potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality. Thus that which is actually hot, as fire, makes wood, which is potentially hot, to be actually hot, and thereby moves and changes it. Now it is not possible that the same thing should be at once in actuality and potentiality in the same respect, but only in different respects. For what is actually hot cannot simultaneously be potentially hot; but it is simultaneously potentially cold. It is therefore impossible that in the same respect and in the same way a thing should be both mover and moved, i.e. that it should move itself. Therefore, whatever is in motion must be put in motion by another. If that by which it is put in motion be itself put in motion, then this also must needs be put in motion by another, and that by another again. But this cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and, consequently, no other mover; seeing that subsequent movers move only inasmuch as they are put in motion by the first mover; as the staff moves only because it is put in motion by the hand. Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.
The second way is from the nature of the efficient cause. In the world of sense we find there is an order of efficient causes. There is no case known (neither is it, indeed, possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself; for so it would be prior to itself, which is impossible. Now in efficient causes it is not possible to go on to infinity, because in all efficient causes following in order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause, and the intermediate is the cause of the ultimate cause, whether the intermediate cause be several, or only one. Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect. Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, nor any intermediate cause. But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.
The third way is taken from possibility and necessity, and runs thus. We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, since they are found to be generated, and to corrupt, and consequently, they are possible to be and not to be. But it is impossible for these always to exist, for that which is possible not to be at some time is not. Therefore, if everything is possible not to be, then at one time there could have been nothing in existence. Now if this were true, even now there would be nothing in existence, because that which does not exist only begins to exist by something already existing. Therefore, if at one time nothing was in existence, it would have been impossible for anything to have begun to exist; and thus even now nothing would be in existence — which is absurd. Therefore, not all beings are merely possible, but there must exist something the existence of which is necessary. But every necessary thing either has its necessity caused by another, or not. Now it is impossible to go on to infinity in necessary things which have their necessity caused by another, as has been already proved in regard to efficient causes. Therefore we cannot but postulate the existence of some being having of itself its own necessity, and not receiving it from another, but rather causing in others their necessity. This all men speak of as God.
The fourth way is taken from the gradation to be found in things. Among beings there are some more and some less good, true, noble and the like. But “more” and “less” are predicated of different things, according as they resemble in their different ways something which is the maximum, as a thing is said to be hotter according as it more nearly resembles that which is hottest; so that there is something which is truest, something best, something noblest and, consequently, something which is uttermost being; for those things that are greatest in truth are greatest in being, as it is written in Metaph. ii. Now the maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus; as fire, which is the maximum heat, is the cause of all hot things. Therefore there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God.
Hope this helps!The fifth way is taken from the governance of the world. We see that things which lack intelligence, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence it is plain that not fortuitously, but designedly, do they achieve their end. Now whatever lacks intelligence cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is shot to its mark by the archer. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God.
Hope ypou didn’t mean to be sarcastic, Eugen. I think the poster believed you asked an honest question and gave you and honest answer.Oh, I see…The “Designer Argument”.
Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut.
Thank you,
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk
The Designer Argument is another word for the Teleological Argument…that life seems so complex and ordered that it would be impossible for it to have happened spontaneously. I will *never *insult someone who posts on my thread respectfully!Hope ypou didn’t mean to be sarcastic, Eugen. I think the poster believed you asked an honest question and gave you and honest answer.
When I read you rtitle, faith did not enter into my mind. The first thing that I thought was, because I feel Him in my heart. But that being a bit subjective (like faith) I will answer thus.Please don’t just say “faith”. There is a reason behind everything. Why do you personally believe that God, or a god, exists?
Thank you,
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk
Yes, that’s satisfactory…heheWhen I read you rtitle, faith did not enter into my mind. The first thing that I thought was, because I feel Him in my heart. But that being a bit subjective (like faith) I will answer thus.
I know God exists in the same way that I know Love exists.
Peace
James
NiceThis is how I know that God exists.
I was about 10 and it was a Sunday morning and we were getting ready for mass. My 19 year old brother had a single statue of Jesus on his dresser surrounded by beer bottles, beer mugs, etc. On this one Sunday morning, the light shined through a crack in his curtains right on the statue of Jesus and nothing else. This was Easter Sunday morning.
For a long time, I kept my radio on scan. It would just go from one station to another and I would stop it when I heard a song I liked. Well one day while I was driving and after I had just resisted a particular temptation to sin, I said out loud, “God I hope you are happy” Right then, on the radio (keep in mind, it was on scan) the line from the Chicago song (Make me Smile), “I’m so happy, when you’re near me”
It had been years since I had been to the sacrament of reconcilliation. I was very nervous and worried and anxious about it. I was dreading going to reconcilliation. Right as the person before me was leaving, the choir started singing “Be not afraid”
I chose not to take these a mere coincidences. I am willing to bet, if you open your mind and look for them similar things will appear in your life.
two word describes this…very cool:thumbsup:This is how I know that God exists.
I was about 10 and it was a Sunday morning and we were getting ready for mass. My 19 year old brother had a single statue of Jesus on his dresser surrounded by beer bottles, beer mugs, etc. On this one Sunday morning, the light shined through a crack in his curtains right on the statue of Jesus and nothing else. This was Easter Sunday morning.
For a long time, I kept my radio on scan. It would just go from one station to another and I would stop it when I heard a song I liked. Well one day while I was driving and after I had just resisted a particular temptation to sin, I said out loud, “God I hope you are happy” Right then, on the radio (keep in mind, it was on scan) the line from the Chicago song (Make me Smile), “I’m so happy, when you’re near me”
It had been years since I had been to the sacrament of reconcilliation. I was very nervous and worried and anxious about it. I was dreading going to reconcilliation. Right as the person before me was leaving, the choir started singing “Be not afraid”
I chose not to take these a mere coincidences. I am willing to bet, if you open your mind and look for them similar things will appear in your life.
Never heard of “Argument from Desire”, so it’s interesting that you brought it up. Thank you.I know that God exists for many reasons, but one of my favorite reasons is called the argument from desire. The philosopher Dr. Peter Kreeft lays it out like this:
1.Every natural, innate desire in us corresponds to some real object that can satisfy that desire.
2.But there exists in us a desire which nothing in time, nothing on earth, no creature can satisfy.
3.Therefore there must exist something more than time, earth and creatures, which can satisfy this desire.
4.This something is what people call “God” and “life with God forever.”
Or as C. S. Lewis puts it in Mere Christianity:
‘‘Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for these desires exists. A baby feels hunger; well, there is such a thing as food. A dolphin wants to swim; well, there is such a thing as water. Men feel sexual desire; well, there is such a thing as sex. If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.’’ (Mere Christianity, Bk. III, chap. 10, “Hope”)
Eugen, do you just go around planting these questions here and there like land mines?..anyway - be that as it may.Please don’t just say “faith”. There is a reason behind everything. Why do you personally believe that God, or a god, exists?
Thank you,
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk