How do you respond when a homosexual rights advocate claims you are "homophobic" and "bigoted"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey everyone. A Catholic friend of mine posted something about homosexuality on her Facebook wall and I responded that I have a gay friend but that I don’t support homosexual acts as they are gravely sinful. A homosexual rights advocate responded to me by calling me “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”. How do I respond to such accusations? I posted what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say in response.
Just don’t respond. People who have to be so rude as to say these things to someone’s mutual friend on facebook isn’t the kind of person you need to waste your time convincing anyway. Someone so without tact isn’t bound to listen anyway. I’d just post something along the lines of:

“I’m sorry that you feel that people with different beliefs than you have to be called such things. Peace be with you.”

If you post anything back at all. :rolleyes:
 
This is a great question. I can tell you how I did. I had a family member (through marriage) try to convince me that the CC was wrong when it came to SSA and their sexual expression. They were, I thought, devout Catholics. Needless to say, their stance shocked me.
What precipitated this conversation? How did it start?
 
Rence, your absolutely right, as you are often.
Thank you, I don’t read the above often 😃
I am baffled at some of these posts-are people really like this in “real life”? I don’t think I’ve ever debated someone or argued with them in real life at a party or anything. It’s just not the time or the place. Bite your tongue, smile and walk away!
Yeah I don’t quite get it. For example, I am familiar with a lesbian couple who has adopted a baby girl from China. Quite a few of their gay couple friends have done this as well. So, you’re at a social function and they’re all there with their kids. How does one confront them about it without picking a fight? How does one invite themselves into the personal life of another family? It’s the same as the wierdness accompanying asking a pregnant mom why she is having another and why doesn’t she use birth control. Just…weird. And confrontational.
 
Thank you, I don’t read the above often 😃

Yeah I don’t quite get it. For example, I am familiar with a lesbian couple who has adopted a baby girl from China. Quite a few of their gay couple friends have done this as well. So, you’re at a social function and they’re all there with their kids. How does one confront them about it without picking a fight? How does one invite themselves into the personal life of another family? It’s the same as the wierdness accompanying asking a pregnant mom why she is having another and why doesn’t she use birth control. Just…weird. And confrontational.
Yup! Minding your own buisness and keeping your mouth shut-imagine that. People should get that tattooed on their foreheads!
 
A homosexual rights advocate responded to me by calling me “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”. How do I respond to such accusations?
Arguing about the morality of homosexual behavior will get you nowhere, if you are dealing with an activist. He or she is committed to the view they hold, and won’t be swayed by an online discussion. Attempting to argue the point will only make them angrier, and convince them more deeply that you really are “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”.

I think PaulinVa has the right approach. I will quote him.
Tell them that bullying people with hurtful language and trying to silence what they really think is just plain wrong.

And ironic.
Tell the person who insulted you that even though you think homosexual activity is sinful, that doesn’t mean you hate homosexuals. Baptists think dancing is sinful, but they don’t hate dancers. It is entirely possible to regard an activity as wrong without hating the people who engage in that activity.

Resorting to insults in an attempt to silence others is a bullying behavior.
 
What precipitated this conversation? How did it start?
It was bunched in with other interesting topics, such as women’s ordination. When we were on the topic, they were very militant. Must admit, I was intimidated and avoided the topic with them in the future. (There were several times this was randomly brought up trying to get me to change my mind.)

Oh, one other time this same relative sent me an e-mail out of the blue telling me that I went to a bigoted college, and how could they call themselves Catholic. That one didn’t sit well with me.
 
But how does one end up in situations like this? I mean, I can understand getting uncharitable comments on your Facebook, Livejournal, Blog, or whatever, if you post something remotely anti-gay or maybe even just pro-Catholic. And I can see arguing with someone in a dialog on a forum. But when it comes to real live conversations…are you guys actually going up to gay people and telling them they are sinning? I don’t have an occassion to dabate the issue with people in real life.

I suppose if I did, I’d just cite what the CCC says, like I did in another thread. But I don’t get all this fighting and bickering in real life. 🤷
Well in real life you get can get fired from jobs. At a work place there were 3 homosexual men, I respected them and got along well with then and one was a former Priest. I was forth right with my Catholicism and never discussed the topic. Sometimes you can only be a silent example.

Where the rubber hit the road is tf you send your children to public schools where they can be required to read or view homosexual material that in some cases is explicitly pornographic and encouraging them to explore this as an optional lifestyle; then you have to make you stand if this is not something you wish to have your children exposed to.
 
Well in real life you get can get fired from jobs. At a work place there were 3 homosexual men, I respected them and got along well with then and one was a former Priest. I was forth right with my Catholicism and never discussed the topic. Sometimes you can only be a silent example.

Where the rubber hit the road is tf you send your children to public schools where they can be required to read or view homosexual material that in some cases is explicitly pornographic and encouraging them to explore this as an optional lifestyle; then you have to make you stand if this is not something you wish to have your children exposed to.
Well, your second senario is not a social situation. You are responsible for raising your kids, and the Catholic Church requires Catholics to raise their children Catholic. So you have to buck up and either transfer your kids to a Catholic school, other other private school, or homeschool them in that case. You can try and raise enough petitions to have it changed in secular schools, but I don’t think you’d get enough petitions.
 
Hey everyone. A Catholic friend of mine posted something about homosexuality on her Facebook wall and I responded that I have a gay friend but that I don’t support homosexual acts as they are gravely sinful. A homosexual rights advocate responded to me by calling me “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”. How do I respond to such accusations? I posted what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say in response.
I would respond by pointing out that those words don’t seem to mean what the person thinks they mean.
 
Well, your second senario is not a social situation. You are responsible for raising your kids, and the Catholic Church requires Catholics to raise their children Catholic. So you have to buck up and either transfer your kids to a Catholic school, other other private school, or homeschool them in that case. You can try and raise enough petitions to have it changed in secular schools, but I don’t think you’d get enough petitions.
We have chosen to try homeschooling because of this. On boards like this you will get statements you could not use face to face; if you care about the person you are engaging in a discussion you would choose your words very carefully. It’s a difficult issue to discuss and with a relative this would be extra difficult. If you are invited to same sex union of a sibling or a close cousin it would be difficult, but as a orthodox Catholic you can’t attend such an event. Or if you are asked to contribute to a wedding gift at work for a same sex union, you have to nicely decline; I have not experienced this situation but chances are that someday down the road I will.

God Bless,
 
Hey everyone. A Catholic friend of mine posted something about homosexuality on her Facebook wall and I responded that I have a gay friend but that I don’t support homosexual acts as they are gravely sinful. A homosexual rights advocate responded to me by calling me “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”. How do I respond to such accusations? I posted what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say in response.
Point out that Prejudiced and Bigoted would be if Catholics/Catholicism merely focused on the procreative nature of heterosexual relations: that is we are not to contracept and must be in a legitimate, monogamous relationship.

Would it not be prejudiced and bigoted to hold only heterosexuals to those standards? As in: SSA’s can go to hell for all we care?

It is with the utmost love and fairness that Catholics/Catholicism (NOT “Christians” as the sadly confused Protestants have abandoned the truth about contraception) evenly applies the expectation of virtue towards all.

See?
 
Hey everyone. A Catholic friend of mine posted something about homosexuality on her Facebook wall and I responded that I have a gay friend but that I don’t support homosexual acts as they are gravely sinful. A homosexual rights advocate responded to me by calling me “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”. How do I respond to such accusations? I posted what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say in response.
It’s a bit rich when homosexuals, who represent only from 1-3% of the population can fling insults at the majority held opinion of society and use epithets such as ‘homophobia’ and ‘bigoted’ as derogatory terms. They are, in effect, denegrating the point of view of the majority and yet, at the same time, they demand equal treatment and equal rights. Their attitude reeks of a double standard.

The words ‘Homophobia’ and ‘Bigoted’ have been reduced to the level of epithet by their continued use as derogatory terms flung against the majority viewpoint. In the process, the real meaning of those words have been subverted. For instance, a phobia is an irrational fear. Assuming, for the moment, the majority actually ‘fear’ this vociferous minority, is that fear irrational? Considering the disease rates associated with homosexual behaviour and the well documented propensity of homosexuals to be promiscuous, thereby raising the risk for the spread of disease, I’d suggest the fear, if it exists, is not irrational. There is also the ‘fear’, if that is what it is, that morally weak leaders listen to and fall for the rhetoric of the minority gay lobby and so weaken and even undermine community standards as they relate to marriage, child rearing and social benefits. The gay agenda, if implemented, will weaken further the institution of marriage and the concept of heterosexual parenting. Considering how what has been considered as abnormal and disordered for millenia, across disparate societies, is now being portrayed by the homosexual lobby as somehow normal, perhaps we should indeed fear that agenda more than we actually do.

As for the word ‘bigoted’, it has always carried the connotations of blind and obstinate intolerance towards something. Considering how the issue of homosexuality has been discussed ad nauseum by historians, academics, theologians, psychologists and normal and right thinking people who base their opinions and conclusions on what is rather obvious as to what constitutes ‘normal’, I’d say the word ‘bigot’, as used by the gay lobby, has lost its true meaning and has been rendered rather irrelevant in the debate. i’d go so far as to say those who use the word are themselves displaying a blind and obstinate attitude towards those norms of society which the majority have held as necessary for the proper functioning of society. One would have to be rather blind and obstinate not to accept that the body parts of homosexuals are not being used for their designed purpose and the resultant disease rates is ample proof that things are not quite right!
 
I once had this conversation with a YouTube idiot who called me the same thing:
Idiot: All these guys are a bunch of homophobes.
Me: Not really. I find lesbians tolerable (if not, dangerously tempting) to my eyes. Gays on the other hand are the complete opposite. ._.
Idiot: That still means you’re a homophobe.
Me: According to the The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, homophobia is defined as,
"1. Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men.
  1. Behavior based on such a feeling."
So unless you’re using the Stupid Edition, kindly refrain from deploying the typical liberal tactic of playing the homophobe card. 😛
That last one actually shut him up and even got seven Likes.

Homophobia is a fear of ALL people with SSA. To say that I’m homophobic just cuz gay men make me uncomfortable is like saying I’m arachnophobic all cuz I’m scared of poisonous black widow spiders even though I wouldn’t flinch at the sight of a tarantula.
 
I once had this conversation with a YouTube idiot who called me the same thing…

That last one actually shut him up and even got seven Likes.

Homophobia is a fear of ALL people with SSA. To say that I’m homophobic just cuz gay men make me uncomfortable is like saying I’m arachnophobic all cuz I’m scared of poisonous black widow spiders even though I wouldn’t flinch at the sight of a tarantula.
Hi Lost,

I suppose you meant the exchange to make fun of the pro-homosexual position. In the short term, that gets a good response because people apprecate a clever retort. In the long run, it’s lacking in substance, so it really won’t go anywhere.

God Bless,
Joan
 
Easy, you employ reductio ad absurdum to show homosexuality is no different to any other form of ‘alternative’ relationships such as polygamy, pedophilia, incest or even bestiality and if homosexuality should be tolerated, these others should be tolerated too to avoid favouritism.

As I did in this thread:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=586160&page=8
 
I suppose you meant the exchange to make fun of the pro-homosexual position. In the short term, that gets a good response because people apprecate a clever retort. In the long run, it’s lacking in substance, so it really won’t go anywhere.
It’s half and half. Sure it won’t convince them against the evils of the gay lifestyle but this argument is good enough against the homophobe charge. You can’t tell me I’m homophobic when I’m only uncomfortable around a measly portion of the the entire homosexual population.

Besides, I struggle with lust just as any other man. I might as well make every young male’s perverse attitude towards lesbians into better use. 🤷
 
I would respond by pointing out that those words don’t seem to mean what the person thinks they mean.
youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk 😃

My response would be this:

Homophobia is fear of gay people. I have a gay friend who I hug regulalry. I would be willing to be your friend as well, and were this conversation in person, be more than willing to give you a hug. That is not the behavior of a person who is afraid of gays. You, however, would afford me no such kindness in return. The first thing you said to me was to call me a name - to denigrate me not simply for being different, but for even merely thinking differently from you - a textbook bullying tactic. So who’s the bigot here? Not me.
 
Hey everyone. A Catholic friend of mine posted something about homosexuality on her Facebook wall and I responded that I have a gay friend but that I don’t support homosexual acts as they are gravely sinful. A homosexual rights advocate responded to me by calling me “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”. How do I respond to such accusations? I posted what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say in response.
You can post saying that you believe that separating the unitive aspect from the procreative aspect of sex is sinful in every case, even for contracepting married couples. Does that make me a heterophobe?
 
I would simply point out the obvious: The parts don’t fit. Therefore, homosexual activity and homosexual “marriage” are contrary to the way human beings are made – we call it the Natural Law.

Jim Dandy
I’d argue that this is a poor argument. Human sex organs don’t care how they’re stimulated, they just like BEING stimulated. This is why humans masturbate. This is why someone can derive sexual pleasure from sticking their penis into another consenting adult’s anus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top