Hey everyone. A Catholic friend of mine posted something about homosexuality on her Facebook wall and I responded that I have a gay friend but that I don’t support homosexual acts as they are gravely sinful. A homosexual rights advocate responded to me by calling me “homophobic”, “prejudiced”, and “bigoted”. How do I respond to such accusations? I posted what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say in response.
It’s a bit rich when homosexuals, who represent only from 1-3% of the population can fling insults at the majority held opinion of society and use epithets such as ‘homophobia’ and ‘bigoted’ as derogatory terms. They are, in effect, denegrating the point of view of the majority and yet, at the same time, they demand equal treatment and equal rights. Their attitude reeks of a double standard.
The words ‘Homophobia’ and ‘Bigoted’ have been reduced to the level of epithet by their continued use as derogatory terms flung against the majority viewpoint. In the process, the real meaning of those words have been subverted. For instance, a phobia is an irrational fear. Assuming, for the moment, the majority actually ‘fear’ this vociferous minority, is that fear irrational? Considering the disease rates associated with homosexual behaviour and the well documented propensity of homosexuals to be promiscuous, thereby raising the risk for the spread of disease, I’d suggest the fear, if it exists, is not irrational. There is also the ‘fear’, if that is what it is, that morally weak leaders listen to and fall for the rhetoric of the minority gay lobby and so weaken and even undermine community standards as they relate to marriage, child rearing and social benefits. The gay agenda, if implemented, will weaken further the institution of marriage and the concept of heterosexual parenting. Considering how what has been considered as abnormal and disordered for millenia, across disparate societies, is now being portrayed by the homosexual lobby as somehow normal, perhaps we should indeed fear that agenda more than we actually do.
As for the word ‘bigoted’, it has always carried the connotations of blind and obstinate intolerance towards something. Considering how the issue of homosexuality has been discussed ad nauseum by historians, academics, theologians, psychologists and normal and right thinking people who base their opinions and conclusions on what is rather obvious as to what constitutes ‘normal’, I’d say the word ‘bigot’, as used by the gay lobby, has lost its true meaning and has been rendered rather irrelevant in the debate. i’d go so far as to say those who use the word are themselves displaying a blind and obstinate attitude towards those norms of society which the majority have held as necessary for the proper functioning of society. One would have to be rather blind and obstinate not to accept that the body parts of homosexuals are not being used for their designed purpose and the resultant disease rates is ample proof that things are not quite right!