How does NOT accepting any of the Marian dogmas affect my relationship with my Savior, Jesus Christ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cachonga
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes - everything’s wrong with that.

That cachonga wishes to become his own intertpreter of Scripture might be ill-advised EXCEPT that cachonga left the Catholic Church to do that. Thus his move is much more than ill-advised. It’s heretical. It’s a given that Our Lord gave us the Church to protect us and lead us. The Church does so by its cherishing Scripture and Tradition. We Catholics need NOT guess at the meaning of Scripture. Holy Mother Church leads us,in that, without error, in its full protection of Faith and Morals. “Upon this rock, Peter, I shall build My Church and the forces of hell shall not prevail against it.”

I’m not very cynical by nature or inclination; yet when a heretical Catholic insists that the Catholic Church gets it all wrong about: Mary, the Sacraments, the Mass, etc. …, then I ask “Why have you REALLY chosen to abandon the Faith?” Was it the strong teaching on the sanctity of life (including the ban on birth control), or the fact that you really want to be a Mason, or a rampant pride in your own intelligence?

PS - cachonga has already approached me by private message repeating that
he’s done with “his” thread and much more. Only moderators end threads. Not cachonga!
I know- his reasoning and logic have been perverted within the brain washing process of accepting sola scriptura. But i believe he is sincere is his quest to save us from the over bearing works based religion known as the Catholic Church! ( true sarcasm there :rolleyes: ) I used to be an angry catholic basher myself and it was with sincere hearts that we longed to pull you out of this false gospel. He was never truly Catholic in his heart and mind- because a child of God exposed to this truth will fall down on his or her knees in humilty and gratitude upon discovering the Lords true Church- but not until the last exhaustive effort to prove it wrong has run its course! It took me 10 years to join- for 10 years I knew… my pride was sooo hurt. Thats why I say you fall down first in humilty- then in gratitude.🙂
and how he avoided the biggest argument- sola scriptura… is it any wonder? He can’t go there!! He’ll have to relinquish his own power of being his own Pope! A million Popes is better than one said Luther. ( jus kiddin’)
Peace!
 
I know- his reasoning and logic have been perverted within the brain washing process of accepting sola scriptura. But i believe he is sincere is his quest to save us from the over bearing works based religion known as the Catholic Church! ( true sarcasm there :rolleyes: ) I used to be an angry catholic basher myself and it was with sincere hearts that we longed to pull you out of this false gospel. He was never truly Catholic in his heart and mind- because a child of God exposed to this truth will fall down on his or her knees in humilty and gratitude upon discovering the Lords true Church- but not until the last exhaustive effort to prove it wrong has run its course! It took me 10 years to join- for 10 years I knew… my pride was sooo hurt. Thats why I say you fall down first in humilty- then in gratitude.🙂
and how he avoided the biggest argument- sola scriptura… is it any wonder? He can’t go there!! He’ll have to relinquish his own power of being his own Pope! A million Popes is better than one said Luther. ( jus kiddin’)
Peace!
maryrev, I do understand what you’re saying and I can appreciate your willingness to extend the benefit of the doubt to cachonga yet I know as an article of our faith that ABANDONING our faith as Roman Catholics falls into a very different category from those who are truly searching for the Faith. That means that while I cannot judge the man, I can say that Church Teaching forbids abandoning the Faith in the most adament of terms. If one decides to look around for “something better” than Holy Mother Church, one will find only lies and liars. Was he ever truly Catholic? Most defintiely YES, if he was baptized as a Catholic, then he is a Catholic - maybe a failed, fallen away, faithless Catholic but a Catholic nonetheless and forever. The mark of holy Baptism does NOT go away. Peace.
 
40.png
catharina:
If one decides to look around for “something better” than Holy Mother Church, one will find only lies and liars. Was he ever truly Catholic? Most defintiely YES, if he was baptized as a Catholic, then he is a Catholic - maybe a failed, fallen away, faithless Catholic but a Catholic nonetheless and forever.
I can sympathize completely catharina! I took a severe view myself in this thread. But Maryrev12 has a point. We can suppose Cachonga is very young, and inexperienced, being dazzled by the prospect of being his own pope. He even likes running this thread like he is the pope! I wonder how many Catholics can say they never wavered in their Faith (or the practice thereof) especially during their college years, or twenties?
 
I can sympathize completely catharina! I took a severe view myself in this thread. But Maryrev12 has a point. We can suppose Cachonga is very young, and inexperienced, being dazzled by the prospect of being his own pope. He even likes running this thread like he is the pope! I wonder how many Catholics can say they never wavered in their Faith (or the practice thereof) especially during their college years, or twenties?
Ambrose, thanks for making a great point.
Maybe the OP is simply very very very young.
 
Ambrose SJ -
On the other hand, it seems he’s old enough to know better.
A post by Cachonga from a Sola Scripture thread:

"Just so you can see where I’m coming from - I was born and raised Roman Catholic. I have received 6 of the 7 sacraments by the time I was 30. I married a widow with 3 kids. We got a special dispensation from the Bishop and didn’t have to go through the 6 months pre-cana classes (we had a 3 month engagement). Her kids had been baptized, but that was it. During our engagement, I trained all 3 of our kids, and they all received their first communion the same day we were married. I had been reading my Bible for years. About 3 years after I was married, I was looking for something to read from the Library, and I found the Documents of Vatican II. I thought “Hey, I’ve read the Bible. Let’s see what I’m supposed to believe and defend as a Catholic”. I was surprised, shocked, and amazed. After seeking God’s will through prayer and fasting, I was convinced by the Scriptures.

I pray that God will guide you in the way of life!"

I can’t even find the logic in his “conclusion.”
I do see though that he is in the position of leading three children AWAY from the Church.
Heartbreaking, at the very least. Guess he really likes being ‘pope’ in his family.
 
The better question to ask may be:

How does NOT accepting any of the Protestant solas affect my relationship with my Savior, Jesus Christ?
 
AmbroseSJ, what a great non-answer.

Leopard, the Marian dogmas carry an anathema for anyone who does not believe them. As the Angel said at the annunciation, “…the holy offspring shall be called the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35) I most certainly believe Jesus is fully God and fully man, and that He was born of Mary, conceived by the Holy Spirit, and that she was a virgin until after Jesus was born. Your argument is very simplistic.

Cthulhubryan, yours appears to be the best effort so far (though there are 4 Marian dogmas, and a 5th is pending). As I pointed out above, I do believe Jesus is fully God and fully man, and that Mary was a virgin when she conceived Him by the Holy Spirit (and remained virgin until His birth). As for praying to her, how loud do you have to pray for someone who is no longer living to hear you? I’d be happy to discuss prayers to dead saints another time, but it’s a bit off topic here. Let’s address the dogmas you’ve mentioned –
Ever virgin – first of all, the Church asserts that Mary remained virgin (that includes remaining physically intact) before, during and after the birth of Jesus. This comes from Gnostic works, such as the Protevangelium of James (according to this work, Jesus basically “beamed out” of Mary). Your analogy is also flawed. Remember, Mary was already engaged to Joseph before the angel came to see her. There are also passages that mention his brothers and sisters (Matt 12:46, 13:54-56, Mark 3:31-32, 6:1-3). I would suggest that Hannah (Samuel’s mother) would be a type of Mary (she gave her first born to the Lord, and he rewarded her with 4 boys and 3 girls in Samuel’s place – see 1 Sam 1-2). Let’s rework your analogy – the King needs a surrogate mother, and your wife meets the specific criteria to ensure success. You both agree, and she is impregnated (a common practice these days). Once the child was born, wouldn’t you and your wife resume normal marital relations?
Immaculate Conception – I have looked in several Bible versions and checked many lexicons in the original Greek, and nowhere do I find “Full of grace” being equal to “preserved from sin from the moment of conception”. If Mary HAD to be sinless to be the mother of Jesus, God could have cleansed her when the angel came in and greeted her, couldn’t He? Of course! Mary did not have to be born sinless, even if it was a requirement for being the mother of the Son of God.
Assumption into Heaven – This is one that I could see actually being possible, but I don’t see how it is necessary to believe. The argument that Mary was worthy falls flat upon examination. No question about Enoch and Elijah being taken up bodily into heaven. They were taken up while alive. Why? One thing I’ve noticed as I study the Scriptures, God has a purpose. I would point to Heb 9:27 (“And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:”). These two didn’t die (yet). Next, look at Rev 11:3 (“And I will give [power] unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred [and] threescore days, clothed in sackcloth”). Some think this will be Enoch and Moses, but Moses died. We know they’re human because they are killed after 1,260 days. They will be raised up after 3 days and taken up into Heaven. What is the purpose for Mary being assumed into Heaven? I can’t find one in scripture. Doesn’t mean it couldn’t have happened, I just don’t happen to believe it.

I’ll end this and see what else has come in. Thanks for the (name removed by moderator)ut!
I can’t say I agree with them all myself and have started another thread about Marian heresies. I believe that Mary was a virgin when she conceived with Jesus as this is in the Gospel and word of God. I also believe in the ever-virginity although this doctrine also means that Mary and Joseph were husband and wife in name only and their marriage was not consummated. It could be seen to be a marriage in law of convenience for the financial provision and protection of Christ. Their relationship was based around discipleship to Christ and they would have shared separate bedrooms. However this is not necessary to be a Catholic although we should believe in the virgin birth. I believe Mary’s womb was dedicated to Our Saviour and a living shrine to Christ a bit like the tabernacle, a holy of holies. That’s my theology.

I believe the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption to be complete heresies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top