T
tseleehw
Guest
I used to live in the Diocese of Pittsburgh until 2009 when I graduated college and moved for my job (coincidentally I now reside in the Archdiocese of Washington - where Cardinal Wuerl is, who used to be Bishop of Pittsburgh for most of the time I lived there).
I looked through the list of priests on the Diocese of Pittsburgh’s website and I did recognize one name - he was one of the priests on the list of priests who had an allegation made against him (not necessarily substantiated) after his death. He was the priest who was pastor at my home parish where I lived until 2009 (the priest in question died of a heart attack in the late 90s). My mother, who died earlier this year, loved this priest and was saddened when he suddenly passed away (as were many others at the parish that I remember). I looked at the grand jury report for the details of the allegations, and his was a relatively short summary compared to many of the other priests in the report, but they were disturbing nonetheless. The abuse did not happen when he was at my parish but rather one of the first parishes that he was assigned to during his time as a priest.
From a personal standpoint, I don’t have any strong feelings as I was never a victim or abused in any way. But it is somewhat unsettling to know that a priest that you knew personally was implicated in this, even if the allegations were never proven either way. My greater concern is for the bishops in the U.S., and the greater Church in general; will they have the fortitude to take the necessary steps to deal with this issue? I have always been of the opinion that extreme measures are needed and I doubt the willingness of the bishops to tackle these issues in a way that will restore confidence in the clergy.
I’m not quite sure how to feel about Cardinal Wuerl, who is now serving my archdiocese as the Archbishop of Washington. I’ve always had kind of ambivalent attitude towards him; he’s made some decisions that I like over the years, but he’s said and done some things in the past that I don’t agree with. Now with this grand jury report, I am leaning towards saying that he should resign, regardless of how well he handled or didn’t handle the allegations in Pittsburgh. I don’t know if he can effectively run the Archdiocese now with all that’s come to light, whether true or not. He’s probably lost the confidence of much of the faithful in the area now, whether rightly or wrongly. So while I am not going to scream for his resignation, if pressed for an opinion I would say that he should probably “take one for the team” and resign even if he himself is convinced of his innocence (and he is past retirement age anyway).
My only fear is who his replacement would be if he steps down; sex abuse scandal aside, Cardinal Wuerl might not be perfect, but we could do a lot worse in Washington as far as an archbishop goes. This is not to say that he should stay even if he is guilty of a cover-up or worse, but is just me speculating about the future if he does leave for whatever reason. I personally don’t think he will resign though, and nor do I expect him to face any pressure from Rome to do so.
I looked through the list of priests on the Diocese of Pittsburgh’s website and I did recognize one name - he was one of the priests on the list of priests who had an allegation made against him (not necessarily substantiated) after his death. He was the priest who was pastor at my home parish where I lived until 2009 (the priest in question died of a heart attack in the late 90s). My mother, who died earlier this year, loved this priest and was saddened when he suddenly passed away (as were many others at the parish that I remember). I looked at the grand jury report for the details of the allegations, and his was a relatively short summary compared to many of the other priests in the report, but they were disturbing nonetheless. The abuse did not happen when he was at my parish but rather one of the first parishes that he was assigned to during his time as a priest.
From a personal standpoint, I don’t have any strong feelings as I was never a victim or abused in any way. But it is somewhat unsettling to know that a priest that you knew personally was implicated in this, even if the allegations were never proven either way. My greater concern is for the bishops in the U.S., and the greater Church in general; will they have the fortitude to take the necessary steps to deal with this issue? I have always been of the opinion that extreme measures are needed and I doubt the willingness of the bishops to tackle these issues in a way that will restore confidence in the clergy.
I’m not quite sure how to feel about Cardinal Wuerl, who is now serving my archdiocese as the Archbishop of Washington. I’ve always had kind of ambivalent attitude towards him; he’s made some decisions that I like over the years, but he’s said and done some things in the past that I don’t agree with. Now with this grand jury report, I am leaning towards saying that he should resign, regardless of how well he handled or didn’t handle the allegations in Pittsburgh. I don’t know if he can effectively run the Archdiocese now with all that’s come to light, whether true or not. He’s probably lost the confidence of much of the faithful in the area now, whether rightly or wrongly. So while I am not going to scream for his resignation, if pressed for an opinion I would say that he should probably “take one for the team” and resign even if he himself is convinced of his innocence (and he is past retirement age anyway).
My only fear is who his replacement would be if he steps down; sex abuse scandal aside, Cardinal Wuerl might not be perfect, but we could do a lot worse in Washington as far as an archbishop goes. This is not to say that he should stay even if he is guilty of a cover-up or worse, but is just me speculating about the future if he does leave for whatever reason. I personally don’t think he will resign though, and nor do I expect him to face any pressure from Rome to do so.
Last edited: