They should because it is a good predictor of future behavior. Not going to judge someone on whether they have a good or bad standing with God, I have no idea, but I can judge if such a person is good prospect for a relationship, are you telling me you make no judgements whatsoever when trying to decide if someone is a good prospect for a relationship or marriage?
Yes, but I judge their character and personality, not their past sexual history. Also, I make decisions based on my subjective opinion and don’t see my opinion as the be-all-end-all. For example, I am indecisive and sensitive. I used to date men like myself. That was a disaster. I then met my husband, who is a take charge alpha male. Absolutely nothing phases him, so he is amazing for me. I don’t like making decisions and he does, so I leave him to make decisions I can’t be bothered with. Then he is not emotional himself, so he can sit and ride out the storms with me. Yet if I was a bossy alpha female I wouldn’t want to be in a relationship with my dh, let alone marry him. So just because he is right for me, and has the characteristics I desire does not make him right for everyone. For example, my sister would hate to be married to him, yet I love being married to him.
When it comes to sex, many women make mistakes when young. You may not believe it in this day and age, but there are many naive young women who truly believe a man will love them if they allow him to have sex with them. And sometimes it takes a while for them to realise this pattern never works. So if I met a man who had like 30 partners, I wouldn’t be pleased. I would probably be jealous thinking of all the women he had been with. I would also make sure he got an STI check! However, if he regretted his past behaviour and saw that it was bad, then I don’t see why I shouldn’t give him a chance. I also agree with The Bucket’s point of view in that everyone has something. I knew one virgin who I dated for a short time and he was blunt, abusive, hurtful and messed up in the head. TBH he was a lot more of a ‘headcase’ than most non-virgins I have met.
Not everyone’s experiences are the same, not everyone settles and you met your husband in your twenties and was involved in a long committed relationship, that is a different situation and it is the same situation as I was in, met a 26 and married at 32.
True, but the average marriage age for a woman in my (over 95% Catholic) country is over 30. People very often tend to move back to their parents when they get engaged, and then will spend a few years saving for a house. So it’s not out of the norm for non promiscuous women to get married in their 30s here. And we have a low divorce rate too. Again, I am really wondering if there is a massive cultural divide here. Since the average age of marriage is much lower in the US, maybe women in their 30s really are settling OR spent their 20s going crazy. I just don’t know. I do however find that hard to believe. I have spent a lot of time in the US and have several extremely close American friends. Yet none of them fit this pattern.
Thanks for the study links. My dh always laughs at my attraction to his scent, so I agree that that is a massive part of sexuality. However, I am attracted to the dominant male type all month long!
I just know that when women reach their 30s they have already begun to lose their beauty (as compared to a younger girl) and she is less fertile. She also has likely had many more sexual partners than a younger girl. A man remains fertile decades longer than a woman and if he keeps in shape can become even more attractive to women in his 30s and 40s. His career has taken off and has a higher value in society at this point in his life. He has better options available to him than some girl who partied it up for her youth and is now looking to settle down. This gives less options to those girls in their 30s, they will definitely have to settle for less than they had hoped for.
You should read this
Interesting article. I do need to point out that Australia is well known as having quite a chauvinistic and misogynistic culture. The males can be so OTT. My dh lived in Australia for years before I met him, and he hated the men out there. He said they were so rude, domineering and chauvinistic. My dh is extremely respectful of women and he said he just couldn’t get over it. I do agree however that women can be a bit silly about relationships. I made a decision in my 20s that I would never live with a man without being engaged or married, and I am so glad I did. I think a lot of these women shoot themselves in the foot because they move in with someone who has shown no proof that he sees a future in their relationship. They then wait around for years hoping that he will propose. My friend lived with her dh for
six years before he proposed for example!! Whereas I made it exceedingly clear right from the start that I would not be moving in with my dh and “shacking up”. So he said he knew I was the one within a year, and he planned the proposal a year in advance.
Again, I know many women who got married in their 30s and they definitely did not settle. My extremely devout and very Catholic mother got married at 30 in 1975 and she was a virgin. She and my father were crazy in love up until the day he died. Neither settled, even though my mother got married at a much later age than was the average in this country at that time.
It is only creepy if it is some unattractive guy that seems needy and obsessed with it.
I don’t want to get graphic on a forum, but as woman I can tell you that the men who were interested in my virginity were turned on by it. They did not see it as a spiritual thing at all.