S
SomeCatholicGuy
Guest
Should she have a career of her own? How ambitious should she be? I know it’s different for each person, but I just wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks in advance!
I don’t think there’s a simple answer to this question because, as you’ve stated, it’s different for everyone.Should she have a career of her own? How ambitious should she be? I know it’s different for each person, but I just wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks in advance!
I don’t think it’s the same for everyone but I certainly would encourage women to have a career of their own and not to rely completely and totally on her husband for support. She should be as ambitious as she likes! Say she wants to be a police woman, if she’s happy to stay as a Bobby on the Beat then so be it, if she wants to be Chief Super-Intendant then good luck and best wishes to her, I hope she does well! I do not think that your career aspirations have a huge amount to do with choosing a partner, unless of course, her aspirations would take her abroad etc and her partner is unwilling/unable to travel, then it is up to the woman to find an appropriate partner who shares the same life goals as herself.Should she have a career of her own? How ambitious should she be? I know it’s different for each person, but I just wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks in advance!
I think that each partner of a marriage has to look at how their individual career aspirations will work for the family unit. Highly driven men who want a wife who stays home, manages the house, and raises the kids may benefit from a different personality than a man who is more relaxed and likes spending lots of time with family. A woman who likes to engage in many solo activities probably wants a different sort of husband than one who needs a great deal of couple time.Should she have a career of her own? How ambitious should she be? I know it’s different for each person, but I just wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks in advance!
I don’t think you can talk about personality traits in a normative manner. I can tell you what I like and what I don’t like and obviously there are the general boundaries that career cannot be more important than family (to the point of neglecting one’s family to climb up the ladder - I’m not talking about service requirements exacting a toll), that it’s not very Christian to have an overgrown ambition etc, but I don’t think it’s a good idea to express personality traits in normative terms and I think that’s where we’re heading.Should she have a career of her own? How ambitious should she be? I know it’s different for each person, but I just wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks in advance!
There’s truth in that, but I wouldn’t like to live in a city in which the women went to work in construction and law enforcement, while men went out with prams for a fashion conversation in the park.There are no statements from the Church that women MUST stay home or that men MUST be the sole breadwinner. Each family can decide uniquely what works best for them.
Yeah.I think that each partner of a marriage has to look at how their individual career aspirations will work for the family unit. Highly driven men who want a wife who stays home, manages the house, and raises the kids may benefit from a different personality than a man who is more relaxed and likes spending lots of time with family. A woman who likes to engage in many solo activities probably wants a different sort of husband than one who needs a great deal of couple time.
Not to derail but, Chev I hope this is not what you really think stay at home mom’s do? I mean LOL the idea is sillyThere’s truth in that, but I wouldn’t like to live in a city in which the women went to work in construction and law enforcement, while men went out with prams for a fashion conversation in the park.
No, it’s not. But the thing is, while it wouldn’t be oh-so-great if they did, it wouldn’t be the end of the world, either. Same as doods spilling beer on their rounded bellies clad in sweaty undershirts. You don’t love it but you can live with it. Now imagine a guy doing what I described before or a woman doing what I’ve just described now. Changes things a bit, doesn’t it?Not to derail but, Chev I hope this is not what you really think stay at home mom’s do? I mean LOL the idea is sillyBut i think I know what you’re getting at…I think
![]()
Amen to that lol.I don’t think you can talk about personality traits in a normative manner. I can tell you what I like and what I don’t like and obviously there are the general boundaries that career cannot be more important than family (to the point of neglecting one’s family to climb up the ladder - I’m not talking about service requirements exacting a toll), that it’s not very Christian to have an overgrown ambition etc, but I don’t think it’s a good idea to express personality traits in normative terms and I think that’s where we’re heading.
There’s truth in that, but I wouldn’t like to live in a city in which the women went to work in construction and law enforcement, while men went out with prams for a fashion conversation in the park.
I wholeheartedly agree with this post.I don’t think there’s a simple answer to this question because, as you’ve stated, it’s different for everyone.
Some women may think in terms of working until they’re married and/or have children, with the idea that then they will focus on their children.
I think the reality is that many women will work during their marriages for many reasons:
.financially supporting their families because one income is insufficient
.financially supporting their families because their husband is unemployed or unable to work
.financially supporting their families because they are widowed or divorced
.no need to focus on children because of infertility
.the satisfaction they receive from the work they do
And, of course, there are women who never marry.
I think women should be prepared to support themselves financially no matter what they may hope for or plan for in the future.
You ask if a woman should have a career of her own and I would say yes. A career – that is, something she is invested in and plans for – is likely to be more satisfying and fulfilling than just taking any job she can find. And that applies to both men and women.
LOL yes indeed. That’s quite the image.No, it’s not. But the thing is, while it wouldn’t be oh-so-great if they did, it wouldn’t be the end of the world, either. Same as doods spilling beer on their rounded bellies clad in sweaty undershirts. You don’t love it but you can live with it. Now imagine a guy doing what I described before or a woman doing what I’ve just described now. Changes things a bit, doesn’t it?
This is so true. When I was going to school I truly was thinking of getting a degree as an insurance policy and something to supplement my husbands income, when the kids were older etc. Turns out my husband passed away and boy was I blessed to have that degree and to be able to work! Sure that isn’t a likely scenario for all couples, but it happens. I’m VERY blessed to be able to support, though certainly not with frills, my 3 children. I consider my education a great gift and am very grateful for it not because I love to work or have career aspirations, but because of what it enables me to do for my family. Just my:twocents:And from a practical perspective, I would guess that most married women will need to work for a number of years during their marriage. That might be only at the beginning of the marriage before children, throughout the marriage and child-rearing, or only after the kids have left the nest. Just because babies might be on the horizon, they aren’t a sure thing, and it sure would be unfortunate if married women in general–and all of their wisdom and experience–were not on more serious career paths because they were pigeonholed into menial jobs.