How is Bayonetta Satanic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter i_need_helpp
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Look I know your intentions are good with all this advice but I just don’t think my own life finds it effective. However, discussing it further here will only bring this thread reaaally off topic. If you want to convince me how the peaceful approach works (though I doubt it), I’ll make a new thread in the category of your choosing. For now, I’ll stick to my position that playing violent games has no negative effects on mature people and if ever managed to get my hands on a copy of Grand Theft Childhood, I’ll even discover how it can be beneficial. Good evening.
You are very correct. This thread is already gone far afield of the OP’s question.

I would suggest starting a thread in Moral theology on the subject of “peaceful” and/or “nonviolent” vs “aggressive” and/or “violent” responses to injustices.
This should have the advantage of binging others into the conversation on both sides of the issue.

Let me know when you’ve started the thread.

Peace
James
 
You are very correct. This thread is already gone far afield of the OP’s question.

I would suggest starting a thread in Moral theology on the subject of “peaceful” and/or “nonviolent” vs “aggressive” and/or “violent” responses to injustices.
This should have the advantage of binging others into the conversation on both sides of the issue.

Let me know when you’ve started the thread.

Peace
James
Done.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=454017
 
Dante’s Inferno video game is based of the 15th century book by Dante Alghieri. In which he describes the three kingdoms, Hell, Heaven, and Purgatory, as he sees it. The story takes place during the Crusades of the Catholic church. A time period in which corruption was rampant in the church. The story portrays the Catholic church the way it was then and the game creators stated that they created the game in accordance with the details in the book. So there is no offense towards the church and the game should not be considered satanic in any way.
 
ugh enough already… i just WANT A Simple opinion GOSH Now STOP ARGUING!!! please enough already wow why are all of you taking this thread so seriously ? i just want a Simple OPINION FOR PEOPLE WHO OWN THE GAME!
I OWN BAYONETTA

First! 😛

No, Bayonetta is not satanic.

Real satanism?
It’s clearly a work of fiction. So there’s no danger of committing real idolatry or real murder (which is what satanism is about as far as I can tell.) As a parent, I would much rather my kids play Bayonetta than letting them join a real life satanic cult or read a real life satanic book.

Fictional satanism?
The game is set in four fictional worlds called Earth, Hell, Pergatory-o and Paradice-o. Fictional devils live in Hell, and fictional psudo-angels live in Paradice-o. The player character (Bayonetta) is a witch who hates both Paradice-o and Hell. She is certainly not a satanist in any obvious sense.

Pro-demon?
No, demons are bad news. Bayonetta deals with a guy who makes deals with the demons, but it’s not glamorous and the subtext is clear that the devils are playing him for a fool. I think this “faustian bargain” could work in a Catholic morality play.

Anti-angel?
The so-called “angels” are the villians. I have no problem with destroying these so-called “angels” because they’re obviously just demons dressed up as angels. Lucifer can appear as an angel of light, says the bible, so I guess that’s a theological point that’s expounded by this game. And as other posters have said, they wouldn’t pass for Christian angels even in their disguises.

Pro-witchcraft?
The protagonist is a witch and she seems pretty cool, so if you like Harry Potter you’ll love what she can do. Personaly, I’m no more likely to become a witch from watching her than I am likely to be a Kryptonian from watching superman. I’d feel differently if she was doing religious stuff but her witchcraft (so far) is as secularized as Superman. She even has to lug around a giant key just like Superman! 😃

Symbols?
Yeah there are lots of hyrogliph looking things scattered everywhere. None of them are particularly demonic they look more like the computer displays in Star Wars than anything else.

Buy it for your kids?
I’m ok with the sort of cartoony superhero violence in Bayonetta (hit someone with a telephone pole sized key and knock them into the sky type of stuff) but theres also some wax museum style execution devices that are ghoulish. (And I reject them as an American as cruel and unusual!)

Buy it for your boys?
Bayonetta looks and struts like a supermodel (not a porn star) but she acts seductive, winking at the camera, blowing kisses, striking poses etc…

Buy it for Pope Benedict?
The only time he’s ever spoken on the subject of video games (to my knowledge) he said that we should not play video games that glorify violence, and spoke about how there is real violence in the world. My understanding of that is that we’re allowed to play games with violence, so long as it doesn’t glorify the violence. I’m revolted by those games anyway so I think I’m fine with Bayonetta.

Final verdict?
The idea that Bayonetta is satanic in any real sense is indefensable. That said, it does have occult trappings that some gamers may find objectionable.
 
I have not played Boyonetta but I have seen screenshots of the game and the game’s title graphic is full of occult symbols. I would be very aware of what these symbols really mean before I just jump in and play it.

The reason is that occult symbols speak to the human subconscious and are used by occultists to cast spells and summon demonic spirits as well. It is naive to think that if you don’t believe in something that is can’t harm you. It can, especially if you are not covered in the blood of Christ and keeping yourself pure spiritually as much as possible. I think that if I feel that I should cover myself before I play a game that it really is not worth playing. That is just my opinion.

The symbols I am speaking about are hidden mainly in the text itself (they aren’t really hidden if you know the symbols beforehand)
No offense, but that’s a bunch of hooey. The thing about the occult is that it’s all a bunch of phony bologna from beginning to end. There’s no power in any of those symbols. It’s nonsense. By believing in them you are actually more likely to fall into sin than by ignoring them for the foolishness they are.

Oh and I don’t own the game but I’m considering purchasing it if I have some extra money.
 
Bayonetta Promotes Witchcraft and Sorcery

I have played Bayonetta, and I couldn’t complete the demo because of the sickly feeling that is brought into the room once the game is in session.

I ignored it for a long while, and played anyway.

The way to analyze this is to put the fiction aside and look at the raw subliminal imagery, and blatant message.

The main character is using WHITCHCRAFT to kill angelic beings. This is an evil concept. (epecially since witchcraft is strong tool of Satan in the real world)

This game teaches you on a subconscious level, to be apprehensive towards anything that might be Holy or good. And that your go to source of power is man’s Arcane access to Satan’s powers.

Witchcraft is arcane and perverse and anything that promotes it in a positive way, is a misdirection from the truth!

Harry Potter is REAL WITCHCRAFT
disguised as fantasy. (the writer herself admitted that she based it on real witchcraft to make it more ‘authentic’)

and Bayonetta is the same if not worse than Harry Potter.
 
I OWN BAYONETTA

First! 😛

No, Bayonetta is not satanic.

Real satanism?
It’s clearly a work of fiction. So there’s no danger of committing real idolatry or real murder (which is what satanism is about as far as I can tell.) As a parent, I would much rather my kids play Bayonetta than letting them join a real life satanic cult or read a real life satanic book.
Satanism is not about simply committing “real” acts of sin as you say. It is about indulging in every desire or activity (whether spoken, thought of or performed) which is sinful, in direct disobedience to God’s laws.

As for you rathering your kids play Bayonetta that joining a real cult, this is irrational I think. Would you use the same “logic” if your child wanted to watch a porn movie instead of carrying out an illicit, extramarital sexual act with a prostitute in from of you? Would you say “As a parent, I would much rather my kids watch hardcore porn than letting them take part in a real life orgy.” ?

Your child has the choice of doing neither of those things and to take part in healthy acivities instead. You as a parent have an obligation to train and advise your child against anything which can interfere with his/her spiritual walk with God.
Fictional satanism?
The game is set in four fictional worlds called Earth, Hell, Pergatory-o and Paradice-o. Fictional devils live in Hell, and fictional psudo-angels live in Paradice-o. The player character (Bayonetta) is a witch who hates both Paradice-o and Hell. She is certainly not a satanist in any obvious sense.
Research the 9 satanic statements and see what contemporaty satanism is about. You are obviously mistaken if you think that traditional holywood satanism is really what it’s all about.
Pro-demon?
No, demons are bad news. Bayonetta deals with a guy who makes deals with the demons, but it’s not glamorous and the subtext is clear that the devils are playing him for a fool. I think this “faustian bargain” could work in a Catholic morality play.
There are so many problems with this concept from a theological and spiritual perspective. A friend of my friend is… SO she has a liaison for the demons. Thats just as bad friend. If you associate yourself with a drug dealer, not drugs themselves does that mean you are clean?
Pro-witchcraft?
The protagonist is a witch and she seems pretty cool, so if you like Harry Potter you’ll love what she can do. Personaly, I’m no more likely to become a witch from watching her than I am likely to be a Kryptonian from watching superman. I’d feel differently if she was doing religious stuff but her witchcraft (so far) is as secularized as Superman. She even has to lug around a giant key just like Superman! 😃
Firstly the Church has already strongly objected to Harry Potter. Secondly the problem is not becoming what you watch so much as being influenced by it. Watching gangster movies has not been proven to cause kids to turn out to be gangsters however it has been shown to be a strong negative factor in the anger management abilities of young people and the propensity to violent acts. Thirdly you are totally discounting the subliminal effects of the symbols and themes shown in these games which are powerful enough to some people for them to use them in occult ritual worship and divination.

It is a falacy to think that becasue you don’t believe in something it can’t hurt you.
Symbols?
Yeah there are lots of hyrogliph looking things scattered everywhere. None of them are particularly demonic they look more like the computer displays in Star Wars than anything else.
How would you know if they are particularly demonic or not if you are not familiar with demonic symbols and those used in occult practices by satanists? Bayonetta as far as I understand and see uses letters of the “angelic alphabet” and angelic symbols along with various egyptian hieroglyphs. Both of which are used in magik/magic rituals by satanists and other occultists.
Buy it for Pope Benedict?
The only time he’s ever spoken on the subject of video games (to my knowledge) he said that we should not play video games that glorify violence, and spoke about how there is real violence in the world. My understanding of that is that we’re allowed to play games with violence, so long as it doesn’t glorify the violence. I’m revolted by those games anyway so I think I’m fine with Bayonetta.
I don’t know the Pope’s take on Bayonetta or specific video game for that matter but because he has not spoken against it does not make it OK. You have your own mind and I think you can put two and two together yourself. If the Pope condemns glorifying violence and also condemns young people exposing themselves to the occult in the media connect the dots and draw your own conclusions. Jesus never condemned stem cell research but we all know the Church’s position on that based on the moral and spiritual principles set forth in the text don’t we?
 
Providence there’s no need for that huge font, screaming doesn’t help your case.
I have played Bayonetta, and I couldn’t complete the demo because of the sickly feeling that is brought into the room once the game is in session.
Catholicism isn’t a religion of “feelings” even “sickly ones”, it’s a religion of logic. Emotions are fallible and they shouldn’t be used to dictate our faith.
The main character is using WHITCHCRAFT to kill angelic beings. This is an evil concept. (epecially since witchcraft is strong tool of Satan in the real world)
No, she isn’t. Real witchcraft doesn’t give you the ability to float around, attack people with your hair, and shoot people with guns in your shoes. Real witchcraft is when a bunch of middle aged women stand around naked in the local park and chant prayers to the “goddess”.
This game teaches you on a subconscious level, to be apprehensive towards anything that might be Holy or good. And that your go to source of power is man’s Arcane access to Satan’s powers.
Source for this accusation that it “teaches you on a subconscious level”? I’d like to see documents from the game company that prove that this game was designed with this intention in mind, or perhaps a link to a psychological study that shows this affect.
Besides, “Satan’s powers” don’t give satanists the power to float around, attack people with their hair, and so on. Real satanists are just obnoxious atheists that think it’s funny to wear silly costumes and make fun of the Mass. They don’t have any magic powers.
Witchcraft is arcane and perverse and anything that promotes it in a positive way, is a misdirection from the truth!
Real witchcraft is a bunch of nice middle aged ladies with smelly incense and color coded candles. There’s no power in it. It’s no more “evil” than any other non-Christian religion.
Harry Potter is REAL WITCHCRAFT disguised as fantasy. (the writer herself admitted that she based it on real witchcraft to make it more ‘authentic’)
Source?
Also, let’s say you find a source, all it proves is that JKR knows absolutely nothing about real witchcraft. The wizards in Harry Potter celebrate Christian holidays. They never say prayers to the “goddess” or “horned god” or go out on the solstices or anything that ACTUAL witchcraft does (remember, we’re talking middle aged women chanting prayers in a park as real witchcraft here). Real witchcraft doesn’t have magic wands or spells like “Expelliarmus” and anyone who mistakenly looks into witchcraft thinking they’ll find Harry Potter quickly finds out how extremely wrong they were.

Do put this much energy into practicing the Catholic faith itself?
 
Catholicism isn’t a religion of “feelings” even “sickly ones”, it’s a religion of logic. Emotions are fallible and they shouldn’t be used to dictate our faith.
Yes and no. Yes Catholicism is not about feelings specifically. There is a rational aspect to the Church’s doctrine but there is also one that cannot be explained by merre logic…it’s called faith.

Some of us are sometimes prompted as practicing Catholics through events and even feelings when something may not be right spiritually. I think Providence was speaking specifically about the reason why she thinks the game is no good when she speaks about her sick feeling. I remember receiving the gift of healing at my first life in the spirit seminar. I “felt” tingling in my hands and arms at that time. So we should not downplay feelings too much. Yes they cannot dictate our faith but they do act as personal warning lights that something it going down within or without us.
No, she isn’t. Real witchcraft doesn’t give you the ability to float around, attack people with your hair, and shoot people with guns in your shoes. Real witchcraft is when a bunch of middle aged women stand around naked in the local park and chant prayers to the “goddess”.
You are both wrong. You just described wiccans not witches. Wicca is a soft, new-agey style of witchcraft similar to (for you martial arts aficionados) how judo is a soft version of jujutsu.
Besides, “Satan’s powers” don’t give satanists the power to float around, attack people with their hair, and so on. Real satanists are just obnoxious atheists that think it’s funny to wear silly costumes and make fun of the Mass. They don’t have any magic powers.
I personally would not be able to say if they do have magic power or not. What you are referring to is the specific rituals of the Church of Satan, not satanism itself as a whole occult religious movement. One thing I do know is that if we Catholics have access to great power through holy prayers and by the power of the Spirit of God, it is not far fetched to believe that there are evil “Powers” that can be accessed by satanists and other occult practitioners through ritual and unholy prayers to evil spirits to have their will done. We wrestle not against flesh and blood…" my friend.
Real witchcraft is a bunch of nice middle aged ladies with smelly incense and color coded candles. There’s no power in it. It’s no more “evil” than any other non-Christian religion.
Again you’re referring to wicca not witchcraft.
The wizards in Harry Potter celebrate Christian holidays. They never say prayers to the “goddess” or “horned god” or go out on the solstices or anything that ACTUAL witchcraft does (remember, we’re talking middle aged women chanting prayers in a park as real witchcraft here). Real witchcraft doesn’t have magic wands or spells like “Expelliarmus” and anyone who mistakenly looks into witchcraft thinking they’ll find Harry Potter quickly finds out how extremely wrong they were.
Firstly Harry Potter would not be very easily consumed by both the young and young at heart (as it is now) if it had “real” witchcraft in it. So they use some artefacts and concepts of sorcery to build the story. But it is all sorcery.

Secondly real witchcraft employs a number of tools and methods of which magic wands (tree branches etc) and spells are very much employed. They also use runestones, gemstones, glass, water, fire and a countless number of things which they use to cast their spells. It is all evil and forbidden to Christians and should be condemned in the strongest terms for any member to practice such things. Witchcraft is based on a similar law to that made famous by infamous Occultist and satanist Aliester Crowley “Do What though wilt shall be the whole of the law.” The witches have a similar one “An’ if it harm non. Do what thou will”.

Thirdly anyone who is into real witchcraft would appreciate how insidious the Harry Potter series is in aclimatizing young people (and some older people) to witchcraft. Witchcraft is all about making ones will into action through the use of ritual magic. Harry Potter and his friends do this and therefore they are protraying real witches in the true sense of the world.

Forthly I don’t know where you got the idea that Christian holidays were being celebrated in Harry Potter. I hope you aren’t referring to the “Christmas” celebrations in on eof the movies. During Christmas season the real witches also celebrate their sabbat called yule tide informally. The christmas tree, although now having Christian connotations, has it’s roots in pagan worship of a tree by witches. Look up history of the christmas tree to see how this all unfolded.

Fifth just as there are many sects within Christianity, so too are there many in Witchcraft and other occult religions.
 
Secondly real witchcraft employs a number of tools and methods of which magic wands (tree branches etc) and spells are very much employed. They also use runestones, gemstones, glass, water, fire and a countless number of things which they use to cast their spells.
Sure but if a witch (could you explain why you don’t consider wicca to be real witchcraft?) points a wand at someone and says “Avada Kedavra”, absolutely nothing happens. Harry Potter isn’t real witchcraft.
Thirdly anyone who is into real witchcraft would appreciate how insidious the Harry Potter series is in aclimatizing young people (and some older people) to witchcraft. Witchcraft is all about making ones will into action through the use of ritual magic. Harry Potter and his friends do this and therefore they are protraying real witches in the true sense of the world.
Harry Potter doesn’t have ritual magic (except for a couple things Voldemort does, and he’s evil). You point a wand and say a word. There’s no rituals, no invocation of pagan deities, no actual witchcraft. It’s X-Men with wands and pointy hats. Anyone who is into real witchcraft would recognize that Harry Potter is absolutely nothing even remotely like any witchcraft performed in the real world.
Forthly I don’t know where you got the idea that Christian holidays were being celebrated in Harry Potter. I hope you aren’t referring to the “Christmas” celebrations in on eof the movies. During Christmas season the real witches also celebrate their sabbat called yule tide informally. The christmas tree, although now having Christian connotations, has it’s roots in pagan worship of a tree by witches. Look up history of the christmas tree to see how this all unfolded.
Where do I get the idea that they celebrate Christian holidays? Because they celebrate Christmas and not yule. Never once in any of the books are any pagan deities mentioned. JKR is a Christian. She has no reason to try to convert kids to witchcraft. No more than JRR Tolkien had in any case. There were wizards in Lord of the Rings too, remember? And it doesn’t matter what Christmas trees were about hundreds of years ago, it matters what Christmas trees are about NOW, in the modern era. Pagans don’t have permanent dibs on everything, you know?

And on the issue of feelings… feelings are due to chemical changes in the brain. They can be brought on by any number of reasons, including psychological. Even tingly feelings during Catholic Sacraments can be brought on by psychological means. If a person is paranoid about witchcraft and they see something that fits their definition of witchcraft, of course they’re going to feel negative feelings. It isn’t an indication of anything spiritual and it shouldn’t be used as any sort of proof. Emotions change, the truth doesn’t.
 
Sure but if a witch (could you explain why you don’t consider wicca to be real witchcraft?) points a wand at someone and says “Avada Kedavra”, absolutely nothing happens. Harry Potter isn’t real witchcraft.
I am not here to argue if the methods employed by Harry are in fact “authentic”, but suffice it to say, if a witch chose to use a wand and audible words con conjure something up there could be a supernatural result. The result would have dark and unholy consequenses but there would be an effect nevertheless.

How would you know that nothing happens? Are you a witch or have you studied the craft? I have done the latter and just as the priest can raise the cup and by the Power of God the wine becomes the Precious Blood, so too do the witch priests and priestesses call on their “gods” to effect change in this physical world. If there were no consequesces to these things like witchcraft then the Church would not forbit these things would it?
Harry Potter doesn’t have ritual magic (except for a couple things Voldemort does, and he’s evil). You point a wand and say a word. There’s no rituals, no invocation of pagan deities, no actual witchcraft. It’s X-Men with wands and pointy hats. Anyone who is into real witchcraft would recognize that Harry Potter is absolutely nothing even remotely like any witchcraft performed in the real world.
Like I said, I am not here to argue the authenticity of the ritual or non rituals of harry potter. The point is that harry potter is a witch and him practicing magic in these books and movies, using some witchcraft terms and references and symbols is a soft way of introducing and desensitizing people into hardcore witchcraft.

Let’s stop defending the indefensible and call a spade a spade. If an episode of dora the explorer features a prostitute but all she did for the whole episode was wear skimpy clothes and purse her lips would that be acceptable because she is not performing sexual acts? No. SImilarly a witch is a witch and witchcraft is forbidden and frowned upon in Christianity for good reason and no attempt to butter it up and make it pretty is going to change what the craft is and what it stands for. I hope you are understanding me better now.
 
I am not here to argue if the methods employed by Harry are in fact “authentic”, but suffice it to say, if a witch chose to use a wand and audible words con conjure something up there could be a supernatural result. The result would have dark and unholy consequenses but there would be an effect nevertheless.
You have a lot of faith in witchcraft. Are you a witch? Because I’m a Catholic and my faith teaches me that there’s only one God and that the so-called “goddess” of witchcraft doesn’t exist. There’s absolutely zero power in any of it. It has no more power than Scientology does. It’s just made up nonsense. It’s only dangerous because it distracts people from what’s actually important.
How would you know that nothing happens? Are you a witch or have you studied the craft? I have done the latter and just as the priest can raise the cup and by the Power of God the wine becomes the Precious Blood, so too do the witch priests and priestesses call on their “gods” to effect change in this physical world. If there were no consequences to these things like witchcraft then the Church would not forbid these things would it?
Source for this shocking claim? I’d love to see evidence of actual real magic being wielded by witches… Do you have videos of them flying? Turning into animals? Changing water into wine? No? Huh… The “consequences” of witchcraft are the same as the consequences of any other kind of idolatry.
Like I said, I am not here to argue the authenticity of the ritual or non rituals of harry potter. The point is that harry potter is a witch and him practicing magic in these books and movies, using some witchcraft terms and references and symbols is a soft way of introducing and desensitizing people into hardcore witchcraft.
Harry Potter is a wizard… like Gandalf. If you want to talk “witches” we should discuss Hermione Granger or Luna Lovegood or one of the other female characters. Harry Potter does NOT use witchcraft terms or references or symbols and the books are NOT intended to introduce or desensitize people into hardcore witchcraft.
Let’s stop defending the indefensible and call a spade a spade. If an episode of dora the explorer features a prostitute but all she did for the whole episode was wear skimpy clothes and purse her lips would that be acceptable because she is not performing sexual acts? No. Similarly a witch is a witch and witchcraft is forbidden and frowned upon in Christianity for good reason and no attempt to butter it up and make it pretty is going to change what the craft is and what it stands for. I hope you are understanding me better now.
I am calling a spade a spade. And your Dora example is absurd. There’s no witchcraft in Harry Potter. None. Zero. Zilch. JKR could have called them “mutants” instead of “wizards” and the books would be the exact same thing. Certain people in Harry Potter are born with a biological ability to control a naturally occurring energy and use that energy to effect change in their environment. That’s not witchcraft, any more your own body’s ability to use oxygen and glucose to create carbon dioxide, water, and ATP is.

I hope you’re understanding me better now.
 
You have a lot of faith in witchcraft. Are you a witch? Because I’m a Catholic and my faith teaches me that there’s only one God and that the so-called “goddess” of witchcraft doesn’t exist. There’s absolutely zero power in any of it. It has no more power than Scientology does. It’s just made up nonsense. It’s only dangerous because it distracts people from what’s actually important.

Source for this shocking claim? I’d love to see evidence of actual real magic being wielded by witches… Do you have videos of them flying? Turning into animals? Changing water into wine? No? Huh… The “consequences” of witchcraft are the same as the consequences of any other kind of idolatry.

Harry Potter is a wizard… like Gandalf. If you want to talk “witches” we should discuss Hermione Granger or Luna Lovegood or one of the other female characters. Harry Potter does NOT use witchcraft terms or references or symbols and the books are NOT intended to introduce or desensitize people into hardcore witchcraft.

I am calling a spade a spade. And your Dora example is absurd. There’s no witchcraft in Harry Potter. None. Zero. Zilch. JKR could have called them “mutants” instead of “wizards” and the books would be the exact same thing. Certain people in Harry Potter are born with a biological ability to control a naturally occurring energy and use that energy to effect change in their environment. That’s not witchcraft, any more your own body’s ability to use oxygen and glucose to create carbon dioxide, water, and ATP is.

I hope you’re understanding me better now.
Yes I understand you but I still disagree with you. Are you saying that a witch is different from a wizard? I am not talking symatics here. A witch and a wizard are basically the same thing except for gender.

Some people who have read all the books are sold on the Harry Potter series (like a spell almost). The views about Harry not being a witch are very subjective and I would even say irrational as it is made clear in the books that he is in fact a witch. If you can call the Dora example I referenced absurd in light of the context in which it was put, then I think you clearly do not understand what I wrote or you don’t really want to.

You should read this from an official exorcist about Harry
catholic.org/hf/faith/story.php?id=37447
Potter and friends.
 
Yes I understand you but I still disagree with you. Are you saying that a witch is different from a wizard? I am not talking symatics here. A witch and a wizard are basically the same thing except for gender.

Some people who have read all the books are sold on the Harry Potter series (like a spell almost). The views about Harry not being a witch are very subjective and I would even say irrational as it is made clear in the books that he is in fact a witch. If you can call the Dora example I referenced absurd in light of the context in which it was put, then I think you clearly do not understand what I wrote or you don’t really want to.

You should read this from an official exorcist about Harry
catholic.org/hf/faith/story.php?id=37447
Potter and friends.
I was just joking about the witch/wizard gender issue. A little bit of light hearted teasing that sort of fell flat. And why do you keep ignoring my comments about Lord of the Rings? I understood what you wrote about Dora, I addressed it when I reiterated, repeatedly, again and again, that Harry Potter is not witchcraft. Therefore there’s no prostitution episode or whatever so your analogy is baseless. And I don’t care what that exorcist says, I am not bound to his teachings. As fellow Catholics we are allowed to disagree on issues. St. Thomas More felt it was OK to burn heretics, should we all go burn heretics? Nope.

Now I would like to ask you to stop gossiping against JKR. When you make these sweeping and unsupported accusations against her it’s libel… and a sin. If you have definitive proof that she wrote the books with the intent to convert the unwary to witchcraft… post that proof. If you don’t, I think you really should retract your accusations and apologize. If you can’t do that then I think we’re done here.
 
Sure but if a witch (could you explain why you don’t consider wicca to be real witchcraft?) points a wand at someone and says “Avada Kedavra”, absolutely nothing happens. Harry Potter isn’t real witchcraft.
You are missing the point totally and I will not repeat myself again. Read this:

catholic.org/hf/faith/story.php?id=37447
Harry Potter doesn’t have ritual magic (except for a couple things Voldemort does, and he’s evil). You point a wand and say a word. There’s no rituals, no invocation of pagan deities, no actual witchcraft. It’s X-Men with wands and pointy hats. Anyone who is into real witchcraft would recognize that Harry Potter is absolutely nothing even remotely like any witchcraft performed in the real world.
You don’t understand real witchcraft what it sybolises. Using real spells or no spells , having something happen or not as a result is all irrelevant. It all doesn’t change the fact that the movie is glorifying witchcraft. And witchcraft is sinful. In witchcraft by the way the witch may or may not visibly perform a ritual before the spell is cast. THere are many websites online now about casting spells and just as you can pray mentally so can the witch conjour spirits and spells up mentally as well so don’t look for the devil with a pitchfork and horns…he is sometimes disguised as an angel of light.
Where do I get the idea that they celebrate Christian holidays? Because they celebrate Christmas and not yule. Never once in any of the books are any pagan deities mentioned. JKR is a Christian. She has no reason to try to convert kids to witchcraft. No more than JRR Tolkien had in any case. There were wizards in Lord of the Rings too, remember? And it doesn’t matter what Christmas trees were about hundreds of years ago, it matters what Christmas trees are about NOW, in the modern era. Pagans don’t have permanent dibs on everything, you know?
Have they mentioned Jesus or the God of Abraham in any of these stories? Pagans can say the word Christmas and not burn up you know. They can also celebrate a secular version of Christmas the way the popular media focuses on everything except the reason for the season…Jesus. That doesn’t mean anything if they say or celebrate Christmas in Harry Potter but are practicing witchcraft. Again, a prositute can be handing out bibles while plying her trade and that doesnt change the fact that she is living in sin. Why would I want to watch a movie glorifying a prostitute celebrating a secular Christmas.
And on the issue of feelings… feelings are due to chemical changes in the brain. They can be brought on by any number of reasons, including psychological. Even tingly feelings during Catholic Sacraments can be brought on by psychological means. If a person is paranoid about witchcraft and they see something that fits their definition of witchcraft, of course they’re going to feel negative feelings. It isn’t an indication of anything spiritual and it shouldn’t be used as any sort of proof. Emotions change, the truth doesn’t.
The point of feelings I made is just to illustrate that feelings are not bad we just should not be led by them but be concious of them nevertheless. If you are a member of our Church then witchcraft is forbidden …full stop. There is no argument that will change that fact so paranoia doen’t really come into the picture. You are right, the truth does not change and the truth is not something either, it is someone…Jesus Christ “I am the way the TRUTH and the light” he said. St. Paul writes “do not be a part of the darkness but rather expose it”. But I guess some of us know better than them. I don’t know that withcraft is the truth…sorry.
 
St. Thomas More felt it was OK to burn heretics, should we all go burn heretics? Nope.
No we should not but we would do well to stay away from them and not copy them or look up to them right? Harry Potter, a sorcerer is the hero in a movie about witches. That is a fact. You can deny that he is a witch from now till the cows come home…the author herself called him a witch herself. She also indicated that she used real aspects of witchcraft to make the story more authentic. How much more proof do you want?
Now I would like to ask you to stop gossiping against JKR. When you make these sweeping and unsupported accusations against her it’s libel… and a sin. If you have definitive proof that she wrote the books with the intent to convert the unwary to witchcraft… post that proof. If you don’t, I think you really should retract your accusations and apologize. If you can’t do that then I think we’re done here.
This is what I’ve been talking about. Did I mention JKR in my last post? Did I say she was out to get anyone? No I did not. But you get defensive and offended. Why? Is she a relative of yours vash? If she is then I understand why you would take my criticism of HER WORK so personally. I never cast any aspersions about her as a person. I tell you, some people act as though they are afflicted by some Harry Potter spirit when you try to have a meaningful discussion on these books. I do not know what JKR’s intent was but I do think that the effect is a subversive one. IF she has the Harry Potter spirit herself maybe it told her how to write it to have the desired effect?
 
Look, it’s clear that you’re not actually listening to a word I say. You have your conception of what Harry Potter is about and you won’t let things like facts get in your way. Whatever. You keep doing that. But I’m done beating my head against a brick wall. I could repeat my argument once again but there’s no point since you won’t listen. Have a nice day.
 
Harry Potter is REAL WITCHCRAFT disguised as fantasy. (the writer herself admitted that she based it on real witchcraft to make it more ‘authentic’)

and Bayonetta is the same if not worse than Harry Potter.
Fantasy Magic =/= Real Magic(k)
You are both wrong. You just described wiccans not witches. Wicca is a soft, new-agey style of witchcraft similar to (for you martial arts aficionados) how judo is a soft version of jujutsu.
Sorry but both Wiki and National Geographic classify Wicca as witchcraft. In fact, just googling the term is bound to get you numerous definitions and references to neo-pagan religions. I’d rather refer to those.
Secondly real witchcraft employs a number of tools and methods of which magic wands (tree branches etc) and spells are very much employed. They also use runestones, gemstones, glass, water, fire and a countless number of things which they use to cast their spells.
Real sticks don’t shoot out sparks, fire, or green smoke.
Real runestones don’t glow and summon guardian elemental creatures.

Real witches can’t manipulate fire, water, and lightning.
 
You are missing the point totally and I will not repeat myself again. Read this:

catholic.org/hf/faith/story.php?id=37447
Sorry but Fr. Euteneuer does nothing but make bare assertions with appeal to his own authority (exorcism) on subjects that he is not an authority on (literature/fiction).

Furthermore, recent events have put the man’s integrity to question.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=532872
You don’t understand real witchcraft what it sybolises. Using real spells or no spells , having something happen or not as a result is all irrelevant.
Uh yes it is. You’ve heard of stage magic right? Are you saying the Church condemns that? I don’t think so. The CCC specifically specifies its definitions of witchcraft and occult. Magic in fantasy fiction such as Harry Potter does not fall under that. Stage magic doesn’t fall under that either. In the Harry Potter universe (as well as plenty other fantasy fictional universes including LotR), magic is a natural ability found within a certain group of people.
Have they mentioned Jesus or the God of Abraham in any of these stories? Pagans can say the word Christmas and not burn up you know.
The reverse is also the same. A Christian won’t be possessed by saying Wingardium Leviosa. There’s no mention of God in LotR (yes, I will use it as an example whether you like it or not) either yet its considered a Catholic work. Dante’s Inferno, whilst presenting itself as Christian, is rife with references to Greek, Roman, and even Arthurian mythology.
 
Fantasy Magic =/= Real Magic(k)

Real sticks don’t shoot out sparks, fire, or green smoke.
Real runestones don’t glow and summon guardian elemental creatures.

Real witches can’t manipulate fire, water, and lightning.
Fantasy magic is representative of real magic just as the cross in representative of Jesus’ sacrifice for the sake of our sins. As I said before. The devil doesn’t walk around with horns and a pitch fork but when he is represented as such it is merly to symbolize non material aspects in a material way. Similarly magic in stories like harry potter may be greatly exagerated in its effects but there is some truth in them as these exaggerations “REPRESENT” the intent (whether spiritual or physical) of the will of the witch. The use of the elements: fire, water etc. in Harry Potter are mirror copies of these saame elements use in actual witchcraft. To say that they are not real witches since in the book they are a race born with powers called witches is to be disingenuous. The references to actual witchcraft is obvious, to anyone who knows about witchcraft, from the terms, concepts and symbols depicted in the movie.

Understand that (as an example) Moses himself did not part the Seas himself. Rather he depended upon the power of God to do so. So to do witches (whether knowingly or unknowlingly) conjure spirits of the underworld to effect change in the physical world. However, just as are overt and obvious miracles not seen in this present age (for reasons unknown to me) so too are the effects of magic in this present age. If Satan did not have respectable powers them St. Michael would not respect him as we see he does in scripture.

The fact that demons and spirits may not be summoned in the movies or books does not change the fact of what all this represents and the effect it can have on many children and even adults who do not have firm convictions about the sin of witchcraft.

Let me tell you: after the first movie made its debut there was an explosion of witchcraft and wiccan literature in my local bookstores. Some books teaching kids how to scry and how to summon dragons? and what chants to say, rituals and all to effect these spells. Symbols and all. I was so shocked because occult books (whether introductory for kids or more advanced for adults) is not something that took such dominance in our bookstores before then. But thanks to the Harry Potter series it has become acceptable to have them under non-fiction and childrens sections of our stores now. I had to ask a store manager one time to please remove a book on practical magic from the childrens section. It featured everything from tarrot reading to crystal ball gazing and spell casting and was right alongside dora and handy many books. She seemed shocked (that someone would make such a request) but was compliant and said she did not know how it ended up there.

If we don’t take a principled stand against the subtle subversion of our people to ways of darkness then we run the risk of becoming lukewarm Christians. We all should know what use our God has for anyone who is lukewarm. If we burn for Jesus then it should be manifest in our behaviour too I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top