R
RebeccaJ
Guest
Doesn’t matter why, it’s still a bureaucracy.Actually it isn’t, and this misses the actual point of doing something simply because one should or one is told to, and doing something because they understand the purpose, benefits, and internalize the spirit of helping one’s neighbor and strengthening our brethren. If someone is doing home or visiting teaching simply for the numbers, to say they did it, etc., then they miss the point, as clearly emphasized by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Didn’t say they were. I said, you’ll be asked for more money.No, these are not obligations.
You aren’t getting the point, it isn’t the practice of tithing that is cultish in nature. It is the tracking, followup and DENIAL of what you consider to be saving ordinances, if/when you don’t pay. You should understand, Christians pay tithing, but it is up to us how much, and to what purpose, i.e., we CHOOSE. No one is following up on anyone else to make sure we’ve paid enough, and keeping us from sacraments because we haven’t.Absolutely not, these are not cultic practices, and it is interesting that I have read many times of Evangelicals accusing Catholicism of being a cult because of various practices such as the need to confess sins to a priest, the necessity of the priest to perform certain sacraments, such as the Eucharist, the Pope, etc etc. The fact is, Latter-day Saints believe that, in accordance with the Bible, one should follow the commandments God has given. One such commandment, out of many others, is tithing, and that tithing is one demonstration of sacrifice. Latter-day Saints further believe that the Lord’s Church is governed by those ordained to God’s priesthood, and that those in authority in the Church of Jesus Christ, such as bishops, stake presidents, apostles, etc. can help us on our spiritual journey, not only in the reception of sacred ordinances, but in the other parts of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, as they are called to do so.
You are missing the point. Again, it isn’t the practice, it is the consequences your church places on you for NOT either a) keeping track of other people or b) doing or not doing something that someone else has tracked about you.If looking out for our brothers and sisters in Christ, checking on their spiritual and temporal well being (“scheduled” I assume you mean when I pick up the phone or email someone and ask if and when they would like to meet to share a spiritual message, or if they need help with anything), is “cultic”, then so be it. We are in this together, and I am grateful that there are those that look out for my spiritual and temporal well being, and will help me (or to use the Biblical word, “strengthen” me) when I need it.
By scheduled I mean, once a month you are required to check on people, and others are required to check on you. By tracking, I mean, who has checked up on who is recorded. Other scheduled checkups are temple recommend interviews or tithing payment settlements.
Maybe you think it is normal for you to check up on other people to ensure they are behaving properly, paying enough, attending required meetings, etc. Maybe you think it is normal for other people to be checking up on you all the time. What I’m telling you is, IT ISN’T. You can lead a Christian life of service to others in freedom. One where, the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing. There is no need for watchers that have been placed over you to ensure you are in service to others.
I am not side-stepping the issue. The point is, no Catholic is kept from any sacrament that we view as a gift from God, given for our benefit, until such a time as we experience a secret ceremony. Do you want to see a Christian initiation? Go to Easter Vigil. No non-Catholic is kept from our most important ritual, the Mass. No non-Catholic is kept from viewing our initiatory rituals.There is no need to read a thread on Eucharistic Adoration since I’ve attended many times, including at St. Patrick’s Cathedral and the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. You are side stepping the issue, since I am not talking about Eucharistic Adoration (a Western practice), but the Eastern Catholic and Eastern Orthodox iconostasis, in relation to the issue of restriction of access to a sacred space (and women are especially restricted from the “Holy of Holies” behind the iconostasis). Yes, there are obvious differences (and again, I clearly stated that there is similarity in “some senses”).
We have many sacred spaces. If/when a person doesn’t go in those areas is not the same as being denied entrance to your temple. You know this, you are for whatever reason, trying to diminish the secret nature of your temples.
NO ONE is walking into one of your temples without being interviewed, paying a full tithe, and carrying a barcoded card.
There is NO comparison to anything in the catholic churches, east or west.
**
You are just making diversions. You aren’t addressing the fact that you must PAY in order to receive what you consider a very necessary saving ordinance from your church. Whether or not you are up on your tithing is rigorously checked to ensure you have paid. If you haven’t paid, you are DENIED what your church teaches is the most important activity in your life.**