How many Christians would love to see Catholics...

  • Thread starter Thread starter eucharisteo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
While I’m no expert on any of those groups, what are the major differences between them and Catholics, other than not accepting the Catholic leadership?

Again, they pray to the same God and they use the Bible.
Protestants don’t agree with:

Statues/Pictures
Mary
Saints
Their Sacraments are different


see more details here: diffen.com/difference/Catholic_vs_Protestant

Jesus told us to “Love One Another as He Has Loved Us”. Let’s keep that in mind…
 
While I’m no expert on any of those groups, what are the major differences between them and Catholics, other than not accepting the Catholic leadership?

Again, they pray to the same God and they use the Bible.
Baptists , for instance, believe in sola fidleis and sola scriptura-the Church rejects both of these doctrines. Disagreements about how one is saved is not a monor difference and can NOT be reconciled. Protestants use a smaller bible that Catholics do.

t
 
I agree and thus we get into the problems of Catholicism versus the Bible.
That is where you side track God’s word.
In this discussion it is important to keep in mind what the Catholic Church means by tradition. The term does not refer to legends or mythological accounts, nor does it encompass transitory customs or practices which may change, as circumstances warrant, such as styles of priestly dress, particular forms of devotion to saints, or even liturgical rubrics. Sacred or apostolic tradition consists of the teachings that the apostles passed on orally through their preaching. These teachings largely (perhaps entirely) overlap with those contained in Scripture, but the mode of their transmission is different.
They have been handed down and entrusted to the Churchs. It is necessary that Christians believe in and follow this tradition as well as the Bible (Luke 10:16). The truth of the faith has been given primarily to the leaders of the Church (Eph. 3:5), who, with Christ, form the foundation of the Church (Eph. 2:20). The Church has been guided by the Holy Spirit, who protects this teaching from corruption (John 14:25-26, 16:13).
.
 
If the Jews put the Old Testament together, who put the New Testament together? What religion were they?
Jesus’ Apostles and Disciples wrote the NT.
They believed in Jesus Christ therefore called Christians.
 
Jesus’ Apostles and Disciples wrote the NT.
They believed in Jesus Christ therefore called Christians.
And who decided which of their writngs should be in the New Testament. ?

And of course they were called Chrisitans-just as we Catholics are today.
 
Jesus’ Apostles and Disciples wrote the NT.
They believed in Jesus Christ therefore called Christians.
Yes, they did. And the Catholic Church, of which they were apart, formed them into what is now called the New Testament.

So why does Estesbob think that Catholics don’t know the Bible? This would be akin to telling Tolstoy he needs to read War and Peace.
 
Baptists , for instance, believe in sola fidleis and sola scriptura-the Church rejects both of these doctrines. Disagreements about how one is saved is not a monor difference and can NOT be reconciled. Protestants use a smaller bible that Catholics do.

t
And those are all the interpretations of God’s word by mere mortal men.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but Lutheran churches believe in salvation through grace alone, right? Does that mean that if they’re right and Catholicism is wrong, that all Catholics go to Hell? Not at all!

We can quibble over over this and that, whether Mary was an eternal virgin or not, and what have you, but ultimately, that’s up to God alone, isn’t it?

One of the biggest problems that Christianity faces is the decidedly un-Christian teachings of Mormonism and the Jehovah’s Witnesses. The rest, while different in their approach, still worship the same God.
 
That is where you side track God’s word.

.
I haven’t sidetracked anything.

The fact is that Mary wasn’t eternal virgin is shown clearly in the Bible. Does that mean that anyone who teaches or believes this is going to Hell? I don’t think so.

My problem with my return to Catholicism is part of this, however. The church, as it converted pagan people, absorbed many of their practices. They reflected the church and the church reflected them. This is the reason for veration of Mary because it’s a vestigial form of earth goddess worship.

Do I think this, in any way, shape or form, takes away from her contribution to God’s plan of salvation? Absolutely not. It’s just that praying to Mary makes me very uncomfortable in light of Exodus 20:3-5.
 
So why does Estesbob think that Catholics don’t know the Bible? This would be akin to telling Tolstoy he needs to read War and Peace.
Where did you ever get the idea I didnt think Catholicsknow the Bible???
 
I haven’t sidetracked anything.

The fact is that Mary wasn’t eternal virgin is shown clearly in the Bible. Does that mean that anyone who teaches or believes this is going to Hell? I don’t think so.
So clear that it took man 1,500 years to figure it out.
My problem with my return to Catholicism is part of this, however. The church, as it converted pagan people, absorbed many of their practices. They reflected the church and the church reflected them. This is the reason for veration of Mary because it’s a vestigial form of earth goddess worship.
You problem is you dont know enough about Catholicism to have a problem with it Revering Mary is a vestige of Paganism? Godess worship/? What utter, utter nonsense.
Do I think this, in any way, shape or form, takes away from her contribution to God’s plan of salvation? Absolutely not. It’s just that praying to Mary makes me very uncomfortable in light of Exodus 20:3-5.
Like I said you understand very little about Catholicism.
 
I haven’t sidetracked anything.

The fact is that Mary wasn’t eternal virgin is shown clearly in the Bible. Does that mean that anyone who teaches or believes this is going to Hell? I don’t think so.

My problem with my return to Catholicism is part of this, however. The church, as it converted pagan people, absorbed many of their practices. They reflected the church and the church reflected them. This is the reason for veration of Mary because it’s a vestigial form of earth goddess worship.

Do I think this, in any way, shape or form, takes away from her contribution to God’s plan of salvation? Absolutely not. It’s just that praying to Mary makes me very uncomfortable in light of Exodus 20:3-5.
Let me tell you something. In 2000 we were attending bible class at Rolling Hills Church of Christ in Desoto, Texas. The question about Mary’s perpetual virginity was brought up. The preacher, very respected for his sound bible study said exactly the same thing the Catholic Church says about the translation of Jesus’ brother’s and sisters that I know you’re pulling out of your hat. I was NOT Catholic during that time and though I didn’t have issues whether or not Mary was perpetually virgin it made sense that Lonnie said that is was plausible to believe she was a virgin because of the translation issues with Greek as well as the fact that women did that in those days.

You facts are twisted by anti-Catholics or rather anti-Mary. I know many worldly people as well as fundamentalist the can’t imagine a man not having sex. And since Mary was married to Joseph they believe it was what they consider “normal” without the historical facts about relationships like this in those days. It sounds too Catholic to them.

What do you know about Moses? Elaborate please so that I can see that you also realize he abstained from sex after seeing God at the burning bush. My goodness. Think about this sometime when you get a chance. Imagine being Joseph. If God told you to marry Mary and that she would bear His son, would you even consider or dare have relations with the woman that gave the world God’s son by saying “yes”? I think not. Only a fool would do so and would lose all respect for giving into weakness for such a thing.

It’s more rational to believe she remained a virgin and not the other way.

Praying does not equate to worship. And the ingraven images thing is way over played, twisted to mean something different that intended. Even the Jews when they build the Temple were told to create images, statues of angels. That’s such a lame position and distortion of God’s word.

Let’s take a look at it.
3 “You shall have no other gods before a]” class=“footnote”>a] me. 4 "You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me,
.
BTW: the NIV was my favorite for reading, but for New Testament reading I preferred the interlinear bible with Greek. Hebrew is Greek to me. 😉

Read that to yourself again. You can’t read out of contest or take out of context because then you distort the truth. In all it says not to make idols of anything and worship it. If you want to be that intent on believing this as you are applying it then you better get rid of all your pictures of every family member and dare not ever participate in any picture taking event, lest you burn in hell. Why? According to your own interpretation you are committing grave sins that will cost you your soul.
 
You problem is you dont know enough about Catholicism to have a problem with it Revering Mary is a vestige of Paganism? Godess worship/? What utter, utter nonsense.
I realized this because of the tradition of putting a statue of Mary in the garden as I was looking for a statue of Mary for my own garden.

It falls into the same vein as celebrating Jesus’ birthday on December 25. Coincidence that it’s so close to the winter solstice? How about the spring solstice and Easter? Halloween and All Souls’/All Saints’ Day?

These are the examples of what I’m talking about: the church converting people and adopting their some of their pagan beliefs, possibly to keep some familiarity for them. They reflected the church and the church responded in kind.

Like I said you understand very little about Catholicism.

Funny, I hear Mormon apologists say exactly the same thing when confronted with things that they don’t like.

Again, this in no way, shape, or form damages Mary’s contribution to God’s plan of salvation, but since she’s not God, she’s not to worshipped.
 
ABSOLUTELY correct!!

I keep saying that in this Forum over and over again!!

I mean, I am from Central Europe - and this is the homebase of Catholizism!! - Guess what I found out since I am here in CAF: Most people here are really fundamentalists, compared with the Catholics I know!!

Esdra
Fundamentalism is not about a faith, it’s about human nature, we get so much zeal for what we believe in, we forget there is an entire world outside of us, so insist upon all that are outside of our understanding are just wrong. We have fundamental Christians, agnostic, devil worshipers, worldly godless people, artists, scientists, etc. etc. and etc. the list goes on and on, it’s when one can draw upon not being self serving, self included, to reach out and realize others have different perspectives, then we learn, we live, and we love. Until we do so, we are closed minded, have nothing but self interest in mind and are pretty much damned into our own personal hell itself.
 
The preacher, very respected for his sound bible study said exactly the same thing the Catholic Church says about the translation of Jesus’ brother’s and sisters that I know you’re pulling out of your hat. I was NOT Catholic during that time and though I didn’t have issues whether or not Mary was perpetually virgin it made sense that Lonnie said that is was plausible to believe she was a virgin because of the translation issues with Greek as well as the fact that women did that in those days.
Matthew 1:25 says that Joseph didn’t know his wife, Mary, 'till (or until) she had her firstborn son, Jesus. 'Till is a point in time that eventually comes to pass, and in this case, it was after the birth of Jesus. She, at that time, ceased to be a virgin. If this weren’t important, it wouldn’t be in the Bible that the RCC uses.

You facts are twisted by anti-Catholics or rather anti-Mary. I know many worldly people as well as fundamentalist the can’t imagine a man not having sex. And since Mary was married to Joseph they believe it was what they consider “normal” without the historical facts about relationships like this in those days. It sounds too Catholic to them.

I’m neither anti-Catholic nor anti-Mary; I am a Catholic and I respect Mary, but I simply have a hard time praying to anyone other than God. I use the simple common sense that the good God above gave me.

What do you know about Moses? Elaborate please so that I can see that you also realize he abstained from sex after seeing God at the burning bush. My goodness. Think about this sometime when you get a chance. Imagine being Joseph. If God told you to marry Mary and that she would bear His son, would you even consider or dare have relations with the woman that gave the world God’s son by saying “yes”? I think not. Only a fool would do so and would lose all respect for giving into weakness for such a thing.

I don’t think Moses plays into this at all. Regarding Joseph, please show me where the Bible has Joseph being told that he’s get married but never be permitted to consumate the marriage. My guess is that he’d think twice about it if someone told him that.

It’s more rational to believe she remained a virgin and not the other way.

Not in light of Mark 6:3 where we find Jesus teaching in the temple and the people begin to murmur against him; “Isn’t that Jesus, Mary’s boy, brother of Joses, Simon, James, Juda, and the two unnamed sisters? What does this guy know about God?”

Yes, the term ‘brother’ can be used to mean fellow man or neighbor, but being named in the same breath as his mother clearly indicates that they were closer to him than people merely living nearby. Not only that, but the Greek uses the word “adelphos,” which is always translated as “brother” or “brotherhood,” and never cousin or neighbor. In Catholic school, we were taught that they were Jesus’ ‘cousins.’

“Praying does not equate to worship. And the ingraven images thing is way over played, twisted to mean something different that intended. Even the Jews when they build the Temple were told to create images, statues of angels. That’s such a lame position and distortion of God’s word.”

What, then, constitues worship? My dictionary says it is 1) homage or service 2) acts, rites, or ceremonies of this 3) adoration; devotion 5) idolize 6) attend or engage in worship

All of these apply to the Catholic concept of Mary. And who did Pope John Paul II pray to when he was shot and thank when he recovered? It wasn’t Jesus, was it? No, it was Mary.

Why would you put Mary or anyone else before Jesus when the only way to God is through Him?

BTW: the NIV was my favorite for reading, but for New Testament reading I preferred the interlinear bible with Greek. Hebrew is Greek to me. 😉

Ha ha, you made me laugh here. I have the KJV and I like the antiquainted language, but I need to get something using more contemporary language because it’s a hard read. Do you recommend the NIV, then?

Read that to yourself again. You can’t read out of contest or take out of context because then you distort the truth. In all it says not to make idols of anything and worship it. If you want to be that intent on believing this as you are applying it then you better get rid of all your pictures of every family member and dare not ever participate in any picture taking event, lest you burn in hell. Why? According to your own interpretation you are committing grave sins that will cost you your soul.

I didn’t take anything out of context; I don’t want to put too much time into this so I’m not going to quote or paraphrase everything on either side of it, only the important parts.

Exodus 20:3: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” Praying to anyone but god can easily go in that very direction.

Exodus 20:4: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above…” All one has to do is walk into any RCC and see staues of Jesus and Mary everywhere. One old church I go to has dozens of statues, but the newer one I sometimes attend has a lot fewer. In any case, this seems to clearly break that rule.

Exodus 20:5 “Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God…”

Having gone to Catholic elementary school, we did exactly that every day. This goes back to the definitions of ‘worship’ noted above.
 
All of this, of course, is far different from having family pictures because I don’t pray to them. Also of note is that a photograph isn’t a ‘graven’ image because graven is simply short of engraven. I think these rules were given because God foresaw that the Jews had the tendency to go back to worshipping that stupid golden calf as soon as God’s back was turned.

Does all of this result in instant damnation for Catholics? Not according to the rules that Jesus gave, it doesn’t. He simplified them so that we, even in our fallen state, can follow them.

And assume, for a moment, please, that I’m right here. What harm is there in believing that Jesus had brothers and sisters (half siblings)? It seems that it would show Jesus would therefore understand our family situations and problems that much better, wouldn’t it?

I mean no offense with this, but it’s something that bothers me and I simply want to plumb it for all I can to make sure I’m doing the right thing.

Someone at church recently told me that while it might be a cop-out, it was simply tradition to venerate Mary as an eternal virgin. That sort of bothered me, too, because it seems to put tradition over the Word of God, the Bible. I pointed out the statue of Mary in the garden near the door (see my previous post) and told him about my opinion that the church’s opinion of Mary is a carry-over of earth goddess worship.

Sorry that this has gotten a bit long, too…
 
All of this, of course, is far different from having family pictures because I don’t pray to them. Also of note is that a photograph isn’t a ‘graven’ image because graven is simply short of engraven. I think these rules were given because God foresaw that the Jews had the tendency to go back to worshipping that stupid golden calf as soon as God’s back was turned.

Does all of this result in instant damnation for Catholics? Not according to the rules that Jesus gave, it doesn’t. He simplified them so that we, even in our fallen state, can follow them.

And assume, for a moment, please, that I’m right here. What harm is there in believing that Jesus had brothers and sisters (half siblings)? It seems that it would show Jesus would therefore understand our family situations and problems that much better, wouldn’t it?

I mean no offense with this, but it’s something that bothers me and I simply want to plumb it for all I can to make sure I’m doing the right thing.

Someone at church recently told me that while it might be a cop-out, it was simply tradition to venerate Mary as an eternal virgin. That sort of bothered me, too, because it seems to put tradition over the Word of God, the Bible. I pointed out the statue of Mary in the garden near the door (see my previous post) and told him about my opinion that the church’s opinion of Mary is a carry-over of earth goddess worship.

Sorry that this has gotten a bit long, too…
I went down that gambit before, Mary was, is and eternally a Virgin, there is no doubt about it. Joseph may have had other children, but if he did, why were they not part of his original apostleship? Makes me think he too was never married before as well, so also a virgin. but that’s speculation.

Statues, pics, etc. are only there to remind us, nothing more, might as well stay home and pray if you abhore them, how often my prayers are enhanced by taking the time out of it, to visit these special places, places that are set up for prayer and have images around, far better then simply being at home, I set aside not only time, but the place to go into prayer with, I come out all that much better, not to say I don’t pray at home, but it’s different when I set aside a place to do so, uncluttered by the mundane of what exists here.
 
I’ll let the others give you the run down on this subject. But your questions are good. However I’ve been down this same path many times and finally realized something that did not make sense by the way you are personally interpreting scripture.

I recommend the RSV-CE edition along with a several translations. That’s the way I studied scripture. In fact, the KJV was part of my study materials. I used to read just KJV and then the ASV. But after a while I began to use the NIV on top of it and then returned to my Catholic bible the NAB which is a good translation according to preachers that studied scripture in college. But I’d also recommend a good bible dictionary and concordance to go along with it. And if you do like most preachers you may want to get hold of commentaries. I used the Caufman’s that are considered the pillar and foundation of the church of Christ. But that is similar to getting hold of Sacred Tradition in a written form, which Catholics have as well. It’s too bad I don’t have you in front of me so that I could more easily go down the rigamaroar and show you verse by verse the problem with simply sticking to your Protestant interpretatioin of scripture. I fell into that trap as well and finally, but only after digging really deep, did I find out the problem with that way of thinking. I wish you well, but I feel very sad for you and your family knowing what my wife and oldest son went through, not considering the pain I was going through.

I’d like to add a very important collection of books that preachers also use. Josephus and Philo, And get at least one good Bible Atlas to show the world and travels of the time. But far more important is to get hold of books that go through Jewish traditions and customs so that you can get an inkling of an idea of what life was like for Jews during that time. It will only be learning about Jewish laws, traditions and culture that you’ll really get a better gist of life for Jews which actually would show you the origins of Catholic and Orthodox Christianity, not this 500 year old protest theology. Example: Contraception. Study what the Orthodox Jews believe about artificial contraception and you see Catholicism. Sex after a woman’s menstral cycle ends. There is a 12 day waiting period. Well, if contraception isn’t allowed then you are now confined to 2 weeks or less of an open window for the marriage act [sex]. Remember relieving oneself is prohibited and very sinful too. So Jew’s are quite aware of abstinence in remaining chaste
 
And something else you need to include is the writings from early Christians right after the last book was written. We call that the Early Church Fathers, or Patristics. Without it you become like many evangelical Christians and strip the patina off of the antique faith forming it into something it never was until the 16th century. There were many heresies and reading the ECF will give you an idea of the thinking of the time as well as a better understanding about Christian beliefs, such as this from the “Early Christian Writings”
CHAPTER VIII.–LET NOTHING BE DONE WITHOUT THE BISHOP.
See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is[administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude[of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top