M
MzAnnThrope
Guest
Secularism is not dangerous and hardly a destructive force for civilization. Hyperbole is not an argument either. Comments like “he is an embarrassment” are libelous. Just how much science do you know? Seriously, do you really believe that a world renowned university, in a sovereign nation with an established state religion, would create an academic Chair then place an embarrassment in it? Oh, please. Employ some critical thinking.Let’s be clear - it is NOT Christian to hate, even Rev. Dawkins. Indeed, we are commanded to pray for him. In the end, we have no idea what is going on in his head, and why he does the things that he does.
But he is a mouthpiece for an extremely dangerous agenda, which seeks to destroy the very foundations of Western Civilization. The criticisms of him are correct - he spreads lies and hate-propaganda, and he is an embarrassment to genuine science.
You intend offense and condescension when you refer to Professor Dawkins as Rev. He is not clergy and has never said he was. Do you really consider it noble to turn a title of honor into one of contempt? I wonder how those who have earned the title of Reverend would feel about the way you choose to use it what is implied in that use?