Thankfully, I think that this view is mistaken. First of all, it confuses persuasion with coercion. How, indeed, can one “impose” their views on other people without recourse to violence? Certainly social pressures can be felt by the person being evangelized, but that does not automatically equate to conversion on their part. Second, is not this drive to get us not to “impose our views” also “imposing” a certain view, that of relativism and pluralism for pluralism’s sake? It seems to me that this is an inherently contradictory view. Third, it assumes that missionaries are totally the Other, as if they are viral agents infecting the host culture with Western ideas. Certainly it is true that we cannot help but have prejudices, but it does not mean that we cannot relate to other people, otherwise we cannot even relate to each other, much less members of alien cultures. The fact that people from every land convert to Christianity attest to its universal nature, or at least a good amount common ground between the common beliefs of humanity and the Christian and Catholic creed. Indeed, the Church has recognized in the Second Vatican Council that all religions have elements of truth in them. Thus, missionaries can persuade many people based upon the shared experience of humanity as well as their particular beliefs. Take for example the eminent Jesuits Fr. Matteo Ricci and St. Francis Xavier. In China and Japan, respectively, both tried their best to conform to local custom and law, to sincerely learn more about the native culture, and even to learn the language (albeit unsuccessfully on St. Francis’ part). These Jesuits basically bent over backwards to accommodate their hosts. It is hard to say that they were acting in bad faith or thinking of anything but the glory of God and the salvation of the world. They did not impose, they invited.