X
Xantippe
Guest
I’ve told my husband that I think he should remarry in the case of my untimely demise, but that I’d like a 1-year mourning. One doesn’t want to feel easily replaceable.
A person is free to marry another when ones spouse dies.There’s no rule on this. It used to be customary for a year mourning period.
(My wife will follow the course set by many early Christians …not entering into a second marriage).I’ve told my husband that I think he should remarry in the case of my untimely demise, but that I’d like a 1-year mourning. One doesn’t want to feel easily replaceable.
This is likely the only viable path for myself should I become widowed, too. I cannot imagine even attempting to search for a faithful Catholic man who would consider marrying a widow with five children to raise. That sounds like an impossibility.(My wife will follow the course set by many early Christians …not entering into a second marriage).
Correction - my wife may be open to another marriage (will have to make sure I do not go first! --darn exerciseThis is likely the only viable path for myself should I become widowed, too. I cannot imagine even attempting to search for a faithful Catholic man who would consider marrying a widow with five children to raise. That sounds like an impossibility.
The young widow in the OP’s question is extremely vulnerable right now. I am concerned that the gentleman who would consent to date her so soon after her loss might have ulterior motives and might be taking advantage of her loneliness and grief. The Bible tells us of God’s special concern for widows and orphans. I would think that those who take advantage of such vulnerable “least of these” will have some serious consequences in the next life. I am pretty sure that is one of the sins that cry out to heaven. I sincerely hope that such is not occurring in this situation.
St. More seems to have remarried for very practical reasons; there is no way St. Thomas More could raise his children and fulfill his job as undersheriff by himself.The need to grieve is certainly important and the good of the family - his family etc ought to be taken into consideration. Time is important.
But having said that:
St. (Sir) Thomas More - lost his young wife (married only 6 years) - and with four very young children to care for -what could he do? What did he do in fact to meet this need? He married the best woman available - a widower (she was older than he who was 33 -she was 40) (he knew Alice well from working with her late husband). He obtained the needed dispensation for a speedy marriage - he was known of course for his holiness so there was nothing unseemly here - and was married quickly and the children had a new mother to care for them —
What was the time frame? --that that new marriage took place that is --(contrary to advice of friends and custom):
Within 30 days.
See “A Portrait of Courage” scepterpublishers.org/product/index.php?FULL=139
I didn’t mean to sound cruel or judgmental, it’s just that I can’t wrap my brain around someone moving on so soon. It seems unnatural. He husband just died, how can she just move on so soon? Do you realize how short 2 months is? How can the children even grieve or come to terms with what has happened if daddy has been replaced so soon. Won’t that confuse them and do more harm than good?To the poster who compared this woman’s grief to loss of your cat, and that you believe she didn’t love her husband because when your cat died you were not able to replace your cat right away. With all Christian Charity you are way off the mark and your comments a bit cruel. This woman is not only facing her own sadness but three children crying daily because they miss their daddy and she is trying to help support her little ones. In all likelihood she is in shock and burned out and this friend is offering companionship and relief, perhaps taking her to a movie or out for a bite to eat for a break. My only concern here would be if this relationship gets too serious too soon, or if this man is taking advantage of her. Otherwise she seems to me a poor soul who has been dealt life’s most difficult blow and doesn’t need pointing fingers at her for goodness sake.
Yes. To answer the original question, the Church in her wisdom has left those who are widowed to discern for themselves how to handle their grief. They are free to marry, and so free to conduct a courtship, if they see fit.God bless, I don’t for a moment believe this widow has “moved on” in two months. She has had male companionship, that’s all. No one said she has moved on, that will take years, if ever. Of course I realize how short two months is, but there was no implication that the children thought that their dad was being replaced. All that was mentioned was this widow had been out with a companion, that’s it. What I thought was cruel was that you implied she didn’t love her husband. I wanted to challenge that because grief is awful and people will seek all kinds of things to help with grief. She is not committing sin, she is seeking companionship. It is common for people to judge that behavior, you are not alone but I wanted to challenge it because I don’t think it is the Christian thing to do.
I read tafan’s post and I have heard the same thing. When people have been in very loving and close and deeply compassionate marriages it is those people that are often the ones that move on to other close relationships. That may seem the opposite of what should happen but I have hear it many times. It is not out of disrespect for their spouse, it is the opposite it often means they were deeply in love! These people are USED to living a certain way does that make sense? When you are used to being smiled at, when you are used to laughing, when you are used to attending Mass with someone, when you are used to feeling emotionally close to someone it is the shattering silence of being alone that breaks your heart and is unbearable.
I love my husband so much that if I pass away suddenly I would honestly hope for him to move on as soon as possible if God were to see fit to send him another woman to love. Provided that woman is kind and compassionate (ex: not taking advantage of him or anything) I wouldn’t want my husband to suffer needlessly. If I am in heaven enjoying the splendor of God it would pain me to think of my husband here on earth suffering crushing loneliness for no reason. I have seen the pains of widowhood and don’t wish that on anyone. Why would I expect my husband to suffer here on earth out of some devotion to me, why should he suffer for a certain amount of months in crushing despair while I am (hopefully) in the arms of Jesus Christ? What would that prove?
It is sometimes hard to understand, some people have ideas about grief and how people should behave. Until you have been there sometimes it is hard to understand. Many people have ideas that go way back about a one-year mourning period or what is proper. You can disagree with me, many people do, I am just offering my thoughts as a different way to think because the Catholic Church does not consider what she is doing as shameful or sinful so neither do I. God bless.
Exactly!The living spouse is free to date at the moment of the deceased spouse’s death.
People grieve differently. Some people would never get over the death of a spouse. Others get over it almost immediately, understanding that their spouse has died and there is nothing they can do to change that.
It’s never a good idea to date again that soon after such a long and commited relationship because as others have stated there’s a natural grieving processes that needs to take place. My dad for instance took 4 years to reach the dating point while I dated a guy that had been engaged and dumped only 3 months before (he lied and told me it had been longer) I came to find out fairly quickly in his case he was the type that couldn’t exist without someone it didn’t really matter who. Another guy I dated had been divorced a number of years and was going through the annulment process but was still extreemly bitter and not letting go of the past relationshion. Granted that death is different so I would imagine it would be harder to recover from such a loss and require a year if not more. Ususally a year seems to be the minimum in healthy recovery cases and even that pushing it.What’s that?
I can’t imagine that a person could have been very much in love with another is after years of marriage and a sudden death she/he were already dating. The natural grieving period is about two years. Some people do act out by dating not because they didn’t love the other person, but because they feel they must always be with someone. That is a psychological problem.In any case, it doesn’t sound very healthy to me.
Your experiences are what I would bring up if someone asked. They are well worth considering. They are not universally applicable, though. If someone else wants to do something else, they ought to be left alone.It’s never a good idea to date again that soon after such a long and commited relationship because as others have stated there’s a natural grieving processes that needs to take place. My dad for instance took 4 years to reach the dating point while I dated a guy that had been engaged and dumped only 3 months before (he lied and told me it had been longer) I came to find out fairly quickly in his case he was the type that couldn’t exist without someone it didn’t really matter who. Another guy I dated had been divorced a number of years and was going through the annulment process but was still extreemly bitter and not letting go of the past relationshion. Granted that death is different so I would imagine it would be harder to recover from such a loss and require a year if not more. Usually a year seems to be the minimum in healthy recovery cases and even that pushing it.![]()
Everyone processes grief differently. Everyone responds to death and grief differently.…but two months just seems too soon