How the sexual toxicity of the 1960s has harmed the Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Peer pressure will never go away, but Catholics can choose not to participate in contraceptive culture.
‘Even when it comes to Catholics who attend Mass weekly, just 13% say contraception is morally wrong, while 45% say it is morally acceptable and 42% say it is not a moral issue.’ From Pew research.

Not many are choosing not to particioate, Ed. Not many at all. Are you really in a position to dictate to the rest of us when your own house disagrees with you?

I think not. John 8:7.
 
Last edited:
Easy. Within 24 hours after the publication of Humanae Vitae in 1968, the following happened:

http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/a_great_battle_for_love_and_the_family

“…an event unprecedented in the history of the church…” to make sure the tremendous effort being put into the “sexual revolution” achieved the desired results. Throw in Adult Bookstores and the Women’s Liberation Movement in the 1970s and you’ve got confusion city. Meanwhile, things were going nuts in the seminaries. And priestly formation was corrupted. Contraception became a “personal conscience” matter after those seminarians became priests. They should have been following what Pope Paul VI wrote, but they were told different. That sums it up.
 
So within 24 hours, Priests managed to start the sexual revolution. I thought you were trying to blame a bunch of conspirators for going around and forcing everyone to throw out their moral teachings.

How was it so easy for society to change from a moral upright Christian nation into a hedonistic one unless those people wanted that lifestyle? Who had this kind of power to change society almost overnight?
 
Nonsense. After 50 years of constant hammering, the following happened:

Late 1960s, some cracks in the wall and a trickle in social corruption. 1967, the Land O’ Lakes Statement is signed, allowing Catholic institutions of higher learning to go down a path based on a false freedom. It caused 50 years of devastation. The Land O’ Lakes Statement Has Caused Devastation For 50 Years - Cardinal Newman Society
Not by coincidence, in 1967 TIME magazine publishes a cover story about The Pill. It tells women it will give them “Freedom from Fear.” Fear of what? Babies. Gotta move product.
1969 The National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws — NARAL — is founded. The co-founder, Bernard Nathanson, tells us that lies and deception were used to manipulate the media and the public. It should surprise no one today, but it worked as intended at the time.
An Ex-Abortionist speaks
1973 The US Supreme Court, citing emanations and penumbras from the Constitution, and a vague right to privacy, legalizes abortion. Jane Roe never got an abortion. Abortion clinic workers lied. “It’s just a blob of tissue.” If it was just a blob of tissue, no woman would need an abortion.

It needs to be kept in mind that at the time, people who were not radicals still put their trust in doctors and others. The corruption of legal abortion led to millions dead. As the 1970s ended, more and more corruption on TV and movies. By 1987, George Michael was yelling I Want Your Sex on the radio, and some radio stations refused to play it. The radicals complained, just as they had been trying to dictate their way as the right way for 20 years.
 
Pornographers who paid the rent, paid for the printing, paid for employees and paid for distribution. That’s a lot of money.
One day, I walk past a bar in the 1970s, and I realize it had been turned into a topless bar. More money to willing waitresses.
Gentlemen’s Clubs open. More money to willing strippers.
Drugs enter our neighborhoods via Hippies who can direct us to sources of supply.
Radical feminsts like Gloria Steinem are spreading corruption through publications like Ms. Magazine, 1971. A soapbox and a kind of “Playboy” for radical women.
“Sisters! Throw off the chains of your oppression!” Women threatening to burn their bras. Why? It turns out ladies’ undergarments were designed by men.

It was not easy. Committed Hippies and Radicals came into our neighborhoods to spread their false gospel. They moved in with their ‘old ladies’ even though mom and dad tried to convince them to get married. Porn addiction, sex addiction and legal abortion did not help. The 5 Year Plan, 1968 to 1973, worked like clockwork. The planned addictions occurred. A lot of money was spent to get as many people into the wrong state of mind as quickly as possible.
 
Last edited:
Also included in the influencers were: the movie Easy Rider which was a counter culture immoral movie that was a huge hit for Hollywood and very influential to youth and promoted the hippie and drug movement,

and,. then the LSD movement of Ken Kesey and his Merry Pranksters who took road trips around the country handing out LSD to anyone who wanted it (mostly youth, of course) because it was legal and they encouraged people to take the “electric koolaid acid tests”. Hmm could that be where the phrase, "don’t take candy from strangers started?

Also, the immorality of Helen Gurley Brown and her changes to Cosmpolitan. What once was a simple woman’s magazine became a huge encouragment to sexual freedom. It wasn’t until years later that a woman named Susan Ellen Browder, who worked as an editor for Cosmopolitan in the 60’s tells in her book, Subverted, of the corruption and dishonesty that was put out by the magazine during the 60’s. (and continues to this day)
So within 24 hours, Priests managed to start the sexual revolution. I thought you were trying to blame a bunch of conspirators for going around and forcing everyone to throw out their moral teachings.

How was it so easy for society to change from a moral upright Christian nation into a hedonistic one unless those people wanted that lifestyle? Who had this kind of power to change society almost overnight?
Nothing happens over night. No one forced anyone to “do” anything. Just as today there are loud voices that influence, there were back then also.

The sexual revolution had been brewing since the late 1800’s and the 1920’s had seen some of their own sexual corruption but wars and the depression put a halt to a lot of it. Plus they did not have the influences the 60’s had; music (the radio), hollywood (the television and movies), magazines and the many other things listed in edwest211’s post and above.
So, where and how did the Church fail? Why were they unable to stop the immorality and leaving the Churches in droves? …Why weren’t they listening?
Some people wanted the Church to be like the world.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the detailed response and to @Edwest211. The thing I can not figure out is what was different with the youth of the 60’s vs the 50’s and 40’s. The earlier youths did not buy into all this but my generation did. What was the trigger(s). None of this would have taken off the ground if no one bought into it. Marketing only works if there is audience receptive to it.

It’s easy to look back and see what was done but why did it work on this group?
 
The 1960’s were an interesting time. Yes, it did seem that the counterculture arose rather suddenly, spreading its effects in the media, in lifestyles, and in the rise of the movement toward hippie communes. In southern California, what had previously been merely drinking establishments discovered they could raise prices by becoming topless bars.

For anyone who wants to get an idea of what it was like from the inside, I can’t help but recommend Roberta Price’s book “Huerfano.” It’s not an expose, just an account of her own experiences. The title refers to Huerfano County, Colorado, where this particular commune was located. Actually, it’s still there, but some of the members have become pretty wealthy by now.
 
Marketing only works if there is audience receptive to it.

It’s easy to look back and see what was done but why did it work on this group?
People become desensitized. You hear something over and over after a while it sounds okay or good. The earlier generations did not have these things coming at them constantly as they did in the 60’s. The media, just like it does today on the agendas of our generation, were constantly pushing what they wanted.

There were the messages or warnings from Our Lady of Fatima in 1917 warning people of the “errors” or corruption coming from Russia, such as socialism, feminism, the destruction of the family and more. All this stuff comes from Marxism.

A woman named Bella Dodd,a former very strong communist, after coming into the Catholic church and leaving the communist movement, testified before a Senate subcomittee in 1953, telling of how the communist party had infiltrated the schools, the Catholic church, universities, government, the movie industry and more in the U.S… She testified how they injected communist ideology into their teaching of the students and into the movie industry.

So, those growing up in the 50’s that later became college students in the 60’s had attacks coming at them from all directions and when the devil wants to get you to believe something he makes it look good, which is the deception. A lot of it sounded loving and good and people wanted peace after the wars but the peace that was promoted was evil in disguise.
 
Last edited:
Please tell me you wear a tin foil hat. For safety, of course.
 
Last edited:
Pornographers etc etc
Gee. Things sound pretty bad where you live, Ed. And you’ve still got Hippies? And I like the capital H - like you’re classing them with Communists. And Radicals. And dear ol’ Gloria is indeed old Gloria. She’s 85 bless her. Got to keep an eye on these feisty octogenerians. And is that 70’s bar still there?

There’s one thing that you have right (but with such a scatter gun appoach as you have, some pellets are bound to be somewhere near the target): there are problems in the world. I won’t bother listing them because either you know what they are or would consider them a conspiracy. By Hippies and Radicals perhaps.

But all you are interested in is feminism, people having sex and listening to ‘rock and roll’. Which you generally only get on stations playing ‘hits from the 60’s and 70’s’. Which is where you appear to live.
 
Thank you 60s teenagers for not taking the time to consider my generation, the next one, your children, instead examining yourselves once again, while we the 80s teenagers wait until you have stopped talking nostalgically about yourselves so we can take the time to look back and reflect on who we were in relation to who we have become.
 
I think there are a lot of 60s teens here. I myself am a 70s teen, but usually look at the 60s and the impact it had on my generation, which was a huge impact.
 
Last edited:
There were pretty significant reforms at Trent. It wasnt called the counter Reformation for nothing. And it was most certainly a response to the Reformation.

My larger point is that Conservatism gives undue emphasis on authority. Authority becomes right simply because it’s authority. The 1960s were no different than the the than the 1660s and the 1770s. In all these cases a large faction within society no longer bought into the notion that traditional authority should just be obeyed. There’s always a throw the baby out with the bathwater mentality in any revolution. Luther was no different than Cromwell and Timothy Leary. Did they advocate ridiculous and harmful things? Without question. But the status quo needing shaking up one way or the other, and the status quo had become woefully out of touch with the societies it governed.
 
Last edited:
It is not the 1960s that is so bad, as it is our inability to adapt to inevitable societal changes. We absolutely need to change tone on sexual morality and stop emphasizing it.

I really wish Catholics could “get it together,” and not have a bunch of contradictory theories about what is moral/ immoral. We must stamp out contradictions and get to the Truth.
  1. If the Truth is proclaimed, make sure it is not watered down.
  2. Make sure there are absolutely no contradictions to the Magisterium. Say: “The Magisterium as it stands currently says X.”
  3. Change tone! Change to Pope Francis’s tone on sexuality (still state the Truth, but not that frequently). Take tons of time/ resources out of sexual morality/ chastity talks, and put it into stopping abortion, helping the poor, and caring about climate change.
Let us please adapt with the times:)
 
Last edited:
That is 100% accurate. Singers and musicians like Jimi Hendrix were very influential. Here was a very talented man who put the counter-culture at the front and center. At the time: “Hey, Mr. Businessman. You can’t dress like me.” Of course not. And why would anyone? People who were highly skilled at using clothing to help promote the message had created a highly conformist sub-culture. A friend of mine went from average person to a product of Hippie boot camp. He wore the regulation clothes, had the regulation length hair, the regulation length chain, etc. His Hippie-speak was perfect. And his about-face, his turning away from what he had been taught, meant he had to smoke dope.

I saw him recently, and to my pleasant surprise, he said, “I got married.”
 
Why did it work on anyone? Marketing is usually done at a distance. On the radio, in newspapers and magazines, and on TV and in movies. These strangers came into our neighborhoods to market their false/harmful ideas face to face. They had to live out their wrong behavior as well. They took drugs, lived with their girlfriend and so on, to serve as living bad examples. I recall an incident where two were standing in the middle of the street. Each one holding a can of beer and having a very intense conversation. I could tell because one kept pointing at the other to make his points. I was trying to go somewhere in my car and asked them to move. They paused for a moment and continued. I decided to drive around them, and one, with anger on his face, punched the side of my car. Their world was more important than mine.
 
Last edited:
Why did it work on anyone?
That’s what I’m asking…if you don’t know, it’s fine to say so. There have always been lowlifes and immoral people expressing their ideas and wanting to be accepted by society. I’m just curious if anyone knows why it worked on this generation and forward when it was continually rejected by previous generations. What was different about us?
 
That is 100% accurate. Singers and musicians like Jimi Hendrix were very influential. Here was a very talented man who put the counter-culture at the front and center. At the time: “Hey, Mr. Businessman. You can’t dress like me.” Of course not. And why would anyone? People who were highly skilled at using clothing to help promote the message had created a highly conformist sub-culture. A friend of mine went from average person to a product of Hippie boot camp. He wore the regulation clothes, had the regulation length hair, the regulation length chain, etc. His Hippie-speak was perfect. And his about-face, his turning away from what he had been taught, meant he had to smoke dope.

I saw him recently, and to my pleasant surprise, he said, “I got married.”
Most of these forces were already at play, and had been for a long time. Every generation has had its version of “rock and roll”. Indeed, the 1950s had its own youth culture as the first Baby Boomers entered adolescence. It’s in the 1950s that you see the first major breakthroughs by black artists who, through white proxies like Elvis, Johnny Cash and Jerry Lee Lewis, managed to get their songs on the radio, and by the latter half of the decade black artists like Chuck Berry and Ray Charles had made the first significant leaps from black culture to white culture.

The point of all of this is that trying to pull the 1960s out of its time, of what came immediately before it, is to leave it without context. That allows for these silly claims that the 1960s is where it all went downhill. Well, I don’t even agree there is a downhill, but if there was, then it began in the late 1940s, took a bit of a turn in the late 1950s when, at least in the entertainment industry, the growing popularity of black culture among suburban white kids was all but stamped out with Buddy Holly’s death, Elvis going into the army, and Chuck Berry and Jerry Lee Lewis ending up on the wrong side of even the broader social norms.

Of course, there were Liverpudlians that had been eagerly buying up every American rock and roll and country record they could get their hands on, who worshiped at the altar that the likes of Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Elvis and the other rock and roll and R&B titans had first built, then reintroduced America to the music it had all but lost by 1960. It was happy (and sometimes a little raunchy) music, not saccharine high school dance rubbish, and along with it came a young culture that viewed (often unfairly) the older generation as a dull, uninspired bunch. They didn’t want the 1950s ideal.

Want to see where the 1960s that some here loath so much started. Going watch a Hard Days Night. An entire generation watched that movie, and as Roger Ebert put it, “left the theater and didn’t cut their hair again until the 1970s”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top