E
estesbob
Guest
If you find yourself more spiritually fulfilled with the Tridentine Mass that’s great . But the idea that anyone who does not agree with you is sinning and their souls are in danger because they prefer the English Mass Is absolutely specious. It is elitism and legalism at its worst . It is exactly what St. Paul was railing againt in his letter to the Galatians. I have the full force of the Pope and the magisterium behind me-you have only your personal interpretation of history.I guess I take it seriously because Michael Davies took it seriously when he said he had serious questions whether the Mass as said in English in the United States was, indeed, a valid Mass…this faux liturgy is replete with disrespect for the host, the celebrant and filled with heresy. (universal salvation among them)…the American version was never authorized other than by a run-away monsinor by the name of Bugnini who was ultimately exiled as the Vatican ambassador to Iran after it was discovered that he was a thirty second degree mason …if you want to see who has denied the magesterium, the Pope, etc, check out the Council of Trent’s anathemae concerning the form of the Mass and you’ll see that it’s not I who bear the fault…there were some in the Church (nuns and priests) who saw this modernist evil coming back int fifties…they cautioned those of us in Catholic grammer schools and high schools at the time that what they were teaching us was timeless and as long as we did what they were teaching us we would be fine in the eyes of God, even if we were the last person in the world practicing the religion that way…you are the one with the weaker arguement - history stands squarely against you
:nun1: