How to destroy Western Civilization without spilling your latte

[JimG]

It’s pretty easy. And it’s already working.

How To Destroy Western Civilization Without Spilling Your Latte - The Stream

 

[Pup7]

Right. That’s totally it.

I suppose you were around to witness the second fall of humanity? Or is this just a supposition?

But no offense. I’ll continue to defend your right to say it - as I do for the US AND her allies.

 

[Maximilian75]

Don’t cut yourself on all that edge, m8.

 

[Pup7]

This article was far too accurate in my eyes.

 

[Tis_Bearself]

The hip people I know who live in Buffalo actually love it there.
Portland has become a bit of a cliche joke.

 

[Maximilian75]

Portlandia, anyone?

 

[Lia]

I’m not saying women caused it, but since first wave feminism, Western culture changed a lot. Gender roles became less and less distinct.
Women are more likely to vote for gay marriage, be accepting of different religions and cultures, and we made up the right to free abortion and contraception etc. Which are all “problems” outlined in the article.

 

[Ridgerunner]

I’m not saying women caused it, but since first wave feminism, Western culture changed a lot. Gender roles became less distinct.

I’m a guy, so what do I know? But frankly, I think the most unhappy people about all of this change are women. Why? Because it’s unstable, and (to my belief) women hate instability almost more than anything.

 

[Tis_Bearself]

Give me a break. Women are not destroying civilization, and there is nothing wrong with accepting other cultures regardless of the borderline xenophobia of the posted article which is obviously meant to get people all riled up.

I refuse to take the bait or play the “world’s going to hell and who’s to blame” game. I think the Lord would prefer I do more uplifting things with my time.

 

[pensmama87]

Correlation is not causation.

First wave feminism was primarily concerned with the right to vote, and in the US this was very closely tied with the temperance movement. People laugh about Prohibition now, but Americans had a very serious problem with alcohol and women and children bore the brunt of it.

 

[Pup7]

Women are more likely to vote for gay marriage, be accepting of different religions and cultures, and we made up the right to free abortion and contraception etc.

There’s so much wrong here I finally gave up on the post because I just didn’t know where to start.

I don’t blame women!

Surely you get why that assumption was made, though,

 

[graciew]

You know,you may be right about stability…that is why perhaps we are also very prone to throw our anchors into sth stable…A rock,a lighthouse. Up high.
Interesting thought,I do at least dislike instability but well,sometimes it is unavoidable. Takes rowing though…

 

[gracepoole]

Women are not destroying civilization, and there is nothing wrong with accepting other cultures regardless of the borderline xenophobia of the posted article which is obviously meant to get people all riled up.

I’m not saying you’re wrong, Bear, but what specifically stands out to you as “borderline xenophobia” in the article?

 

[Pup7]

This I agree with in many ways. I’m out of likes, Cajun.

 

[Tis_Bearself]

When they talk about globalism like it is something bad.
Being accepting of other religions and cultures is not disavowing Christ. Globalism only becomes a problem when people take it too far and decide that everything non-Western is somehow better than everything Western.

The article seems to me like it’s either written for old grandparents to agree with or for very young inexperienced people to receive a message that traditional Western values good, stuff from anywhere else bad, though it looks attractive. It’s like the kind of thing some of my boho friends get sent by their old aunts in the email or Facebook posts. They roll their eyes, make a joke and move on.

 

[gracepoole]

Ah, got it. Thanks for explaining further.

 

[starshiptrooper]

Someone acknowledges part of the problem.

Single womyn are the biggest supporters of the modern nanny state in all of its stifling “glory”. They also tend to be more accepting of foreigners as well.

On that note, I cannot remember which European government did the study but they found that women are a net drain on the welfare state. Incidentally that partially explains why women are more likely to support the mass invasion from the 3rd World.

 

[Pup7]

They also tend to be more accepting of foreigners as well.

So accepting I married one.

As for the rest of the post - misogynistic much? How utterly Christian of you. (sniff)

 

[graciew]

Oh well…that is only when one sees double…
Sometimes it is only about wearing glasses…women and men alike.

 

[exnihilo]

Single womyn are the biggest supporters of the modern nanny state in all of its stifling “glory”. They also tend to be more accepting of foreigners as well.

Someone is always going to be responsible for taking care of women. That will either be the father and then husband, or the state. That will offend a lot of people, but it is simply true. A reason is women are physically weaker. So you need the physical strength of a man, or the corporate violence of the state to maintain order.

Also, some group will always be on top. It will either be your group or someone else’s. It is better for you for it to be yours. The group on top can be more or less fair to outsiders. Christendom was the most fair to others. The groups replacing it are anything but fair. Knowing this is why I oppose the suicidal treason from within to destroy Christendom.