One error occurs when one group claims that people of one particular political/ideological affiliation are themselves more worthy of the Eucharist than the other. Do you agree with this?
You asked what I thought of your post.
Replying to your entire post…
I think it is difficult to generalize or conceptualize these ideas without defining different terms—like what constitutes “groups”. God created us uniquely because He values our individuality. Personality, culture, ethnicity, male or female, stages of life—all important and different and beautiful. But not bigotry and racism and types of superiority.
Jesus didn’t come to make understanding and consensus the goal. The love he preached was acceptance. It was the acceptance of others without exclusion, and yet also an invitation
with specific criteria.
These criteria do determine whether you are “worthy” for admittance to the Eucharist.
Therefore, it depends on what you mean by “ideological affiliation.” Catholicism is a specific ideological affiliation expressed by the Creed that makes you worthy to recieve the Eucharist.
There are ideological and political affiliations that are not consistent with the Catholic faith. Some of them support “agendas” that are completely contrary to the specific criteria required for admittance to Communion. In this way, when “one group claims that people of one particular political/ideological affiliation are themselves more worthy of the Eucharist than the other,” they may not be wrong.
They may also not be capable of objectively determining who fits those categories. That is why we have the Church. The Church teaches that you have to vote consistently with your Catholic faith. It gets extremely complicated very quickly, because there hasn’t been many, if any, candidates up for election that are consistently in line with Church teaching.
Prayer is really the only true answer.